Search
 
 
Edit Shopping CART(106)  |  Sunday, November 22, 2009
 
 
ARTICLES  &  COMMENTARY
Should No Child Left Behind Be Reauthorized?
 
NCLB is a disaster for federalism, excellence, and imagination.
 
W. H. Brady Scholar Charles Murray  
W. H. Brady Scholar
 Charles Murray
 
Test scores are the last refuge of the No Child Left Behind Act. They have to be, because so little else about the act is attractive.

The act takes a giant step toward nationalizing elementary and secondary education, a disaster for federalism. It pushes classrooms toward relentless drilling, not something that inspires able people to become teachers or makes children eager to learn. It holds good students hostage to the performance of the least talented, at a time when the economic future of the country depends more than ever on the performance of the most talented.

The federal government is doling out rewards and penalties to school systems across the country based on changes in pass percentages. It is an uninformative measure for many reasons, but when it comes to measuring one of the central outcomes sought by No Child Left Behind, the closure of the achievement gap that separates poor students from rich, Latino from white, and black from white, the measure is beyond uninformative. It is deceptive.

Charles Murray is the W. H. Brady Scholar at AEI.