The panic and money-market funds

White House/Pete Souza

President Barack Obama meets with heads of financial regulatory agencies in the Roosevelt Room of the White House to receive an update on implementation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, July 18, 2011.

Article Highlights

  • To believe that the taxpayers are standing behind money-market funds is to endorse the underlying theory of Dodd-Frank.

    Tweet This

  • The supposed instability of unregulated markets is the left's basis for regulating financial markets.

    Tweet This

  • “In the absence of a financial panic, I believe that unregulated markets are generally stable.” –Peter J. Wallison

    Tweet This

Although I agree with the commenters (Letters, June 14) who upbraid the Journal for its position on money-market fund regulation, there's a bigger issue involved. Whatever happened to the Journal's confidence that unregulated markets are stable? To believe that the taxpayers are standing behind money-market funds is to endorse the underlying theory of the Dodd-Frank Act. The supposed instability of unregulated markets is the left's basis for regulating financial markets, including money-market funds.

The crisis was an investor panic in which one of the results—in addition to several failures among heavily regulated banks and rescues of lightly regulated investment banks—was that a money-market fund broke the buck. In the panic, many investors redeemed their shares in similar funds.

Without minimizing the seriousness of the crisis, it is necessary to recognize the importance of the panic. In the one previous case of breaking the buck there were no significant withdrawals from other funds, just as the failure of Drexel Burnham (the fourth largest investment bank) in 1990 did not trigger a run on others—although in the anxious times of 2008, Lehman's failure did. That there have been other instances in which fund sponsors supported their funds proves nothing; we do not know whether runs on other funds would have occurred in those cases. My bet is no. In the absence of a financial panic, I believe that unregulated markets are generally stable. This was the first panic in 80 years and maybe since 1907. Money-market funds are a successful $3 trillion business. One instance of instability in a financial panic is not a reason to wreck the business model.

Peter J. Wallison is the Arthur F. Burns Fellow in Financial Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute. He was a general counsel of the U.S. Treasury Department and served as White House counsel to President Ronald Reagan.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Peter J.
Wallison

What's new on AEI

How the Common Core went wrong
image Election countdown: The mood, measurements, and mechanics
image Rubio's defense speech: Fearless, informed, and refreshing
image Sorry Kerry, there is little role for Iran in fighting ISIS
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 22
    MON
  • 23
    TUE
  • 24
    WED
  • 25
    THU
  • 26
    FRI
Monday, September 22, 2014 | 2:30 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.
Policy implications of the new US labor market normal

We welcome you to join us as a panel of economists discuss US wage and price prospects in the coming months and the implications for the Federal Reserve’s current unorthodox monetary policy.

Friday, September 26, 2014 | 8:30 a.m. – 9:00 a.m.
#ModiInUS: Can Modi’s visit to the White House put US-India relations back on track?

Tune in for this Google Hangout discussion with three leading experts about the implications of the Obama-Modi summit. Tweet your questions and comments to @AEI with #ModiInUS.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.