Letter to the editor: There are issues with a revenue-neutral carbon tax

This letter is a response to an op-ed "Why We Support a Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax" by George P. Shultz and Gary S. Becker from April 8, 2013.

The authors may believe that carbon (dioxide) is a "major pollutant," but nowhere in their op-ed do we find a hint about the actual environmental benefits attendant upon the imposition of a carbon tax. The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's best estimate of the temperature effect of a doubling of carbon-dioxide concentrations by 2100 is three degrees Celsius. U.S. emissions of greenhouse gases are about 18% of global emissions, so that our contribution would be about 0.5 degrees. If we were to cut that in half---an impossible goal economically---the reduction in U.S. "pollution" would be 0.2-0.3 degrees, the climate effect of which would be unmeasurable.

There is nothing "efficient" about a tax that yields no benefit, and were the tax to be imposed by international agreement (a tax cartel), efficiency would be the least likely outcome. Their call for revenue (actually, spending) "neutrality" would not yield greater efficiency because there is no particular reason to believe that carbon emissions are a useful proxy for the benefits of government spending. Messrs. Shultz and Becker have given us an idea truly half-baked, which on the plus side probably reduced their carbon footprint. 

Benjamin Zycher is a visiting scholar at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Benjamin
Zycher

What's new on AEI

We still don't know how many people Obamacare enrolled
image The war on invisible poverty
image Cutting fat from the budget
image Speaker of the House John Boehner on resetting America’s economic foundation
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 22
    MON
  • 23
    TUE
  • 24
    WED
  • 25
    THU
  • 26
    FRI
Monday, September 22, 2014 | 2:30 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.
Policy implications of the new US labor market normal

We welcome you to join us as a panel of economists discuss US wage and price prospects in the coming months and the implications for the Federal Reserve’s current unorthodox monetary policy.

No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.