Pension Fund Politics
The Dangers of Socially Responsible Investing

Click here to view the full book as an Adobe PDF.

Or view by chapter:

"The Politicization of Public Investments," by Jon Entine

"Social Investing: Pension Plans Should Just Say 'No,'" by Alicia H. Munnell and Annika Sunden

"Why Social Investing Threatens Public Pension Funds, Charitable Trusts, and the Social Secuirty Trust Fund," by Charles E. Rounds Jr.

"The Strategic Use of Socially Responsible Investing," by Jarol B. Manheim

Public employee retirement funds collectively hold almost $2 trillion in assets. Should the government and union officials entrusted with managing this money make investment decisions guided by their political views? Should personal morality and ideology, which vary dramatically across the country, influence public investments, including Social Security?

Traditionally, public investments have been managed according to strict fiduciary principles designed to protect the retirement security of America’s teachers, fire fighters, police officers, and other public workers. That tradition is now under assault. In some state and local governments, politicians responsible for overseeing these funds are embracing highly controversial and potentially risky investment criteria known as “socially responsible investing.” Pension Fund Politics examines this controversial trend. An ideologically diverse group of scholars address the legal, political, and fiduciary consequences of injecting social and ethical criteria into the management of pension funds.

Certainly, as part of their fiduciary mandate to maximize investment returns for their beneficiaries, pension-fund trustees have a duty to press for changes in corporate behavior that could result in better returns for their pension holders. But judging by the actions of many activists now running multi-billion dollar pension funds, using social investing under the guise of increasing “shareholder value” threatens to undermine the financial security of retirees who have no say in these highly politicized investment decisions. The authors argue that social investing, by both the political left and right, frequently ends up hurting the very people—particularly the economically disadvantaged—that it is supposed to help. Pension funds are being dragged into treacherous waters where political grandstanding or moral righteousness threatens clear financial mandates. In many instances, social investing amounts to little more than ideologically driven gambling with other people’s money.

Jon H. Entine is a scholar in residence at Miami University (Ohio) and an adjunct fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Jon
Entine

What's new on AEI

Making Ryan's tax plan smarter
image The teacher evaluation confronts the future
image How to reform the US immigration system
image Inversion hysteria
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 25
    MON
  • 26
    TUE
  • 27
    WED
  • 28
    THU
  • 29
    FRI
Wednesday, August 27, 2014 | 3:00 p.m. – 4:15 p.m.
Teacher quality 2.0: Toward a new era in education reform

Please join AEI for a conversation among several contributors to the new volume “Teacher Quality 2.0: Toward a New Era in Education Reform” (Harvard Education Press, 2014), edited by Frederick M. Hess and Michael Q. McShane. Panelists will discuss the intersection of teacher-quality policy and innovation, exploring roadblocks and possibilities.

Event Registration is Closed
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.