Candy by Shutterstock
Article Highlights
- Chocolate for your sweetie is more expensive because of federal government farm policies #HappyValentinesDay
- Sugar is scarcely an essential tool for a viable agricultural sector. So why are the feds interfering? #HappyValentinesDay
- Lovers will pay more for the privilege of buying a box of candy because of government quotas #HappyValentinesDay
Sweets for the Sweet: The Costly Benefits of the US Sugar Program
Download PDF
Times change and not everything remains the same.
Would that were true about the U.S. sugar program. Valentine’s Day is here again and every lover who buys his or her significant other a box of candy will pay just a little bit more for the privilege because of sugar quotas that generally guarantee sugar cane and beet producers and sugar processors higher returns than they would obtain if they faced genuine competition from the global market.
The U.S. sugar program raises food prices on supermarket shelves and reduces the ability of U.S. food processors to compete in world markets. The program costs the U.S. economy thousands of manufacturing jobs and, in a world of record prices for other major crops like corn and wheat, is scarcely an essential tool for maintaining a viable U.S. agricultural sector.
As Professor Michael Wohlgenant and I argued last year, it is well past time for the program to be disestablished.








