While reducing statutory rates would provide a benefit to existing investments and improve the valuation of the company from the point of view of the shareholders, expanding expensing and accelerated depreciation provisions would generate returns over the lifetime of the company by improving cash flows and thereby enhancing firm value. Both types of reforms are critical to firms that are deciding what new investments to undertake and which activities will generate the highest return. In economic terms, the user cost of capital, or the implicit annual cost of investing in physical capital, is determined by not only the headline corporate tax rate, but also other factors such as the rate of depreciation as well as the interest rate. Therefore, any changes to either the tax rates or the provisions affecting the return from capital, would lead to a change in the user cost, which would affect physical capital investments by firms.
What's new on AEI
|To secure southern border, US must lead international effort to stabilize Central America|
|The Ryan pro-work, anti-poverty plan: Thomas Aquinas 1, Ayn Rand 0|
|Does SNAP support work? Yes and no|
|Obama Democrats lose their big bet on health exchanges|
Please join AEI as the chief actuary for Medicare summarizes the report’s results, followed by a panel discussion of what those spending trends are likely to mean for seniors, taxpayers, the health industry, and federal policy.
Please join us as four of Washington’s most distinguished political observers will revisit the Watergate hearings and discuss reforms that followed.