The Stimulus Bill
The Other Long-Term Deficit Challenge

A. Introduction

While there has been much discussion in the media about the potential long-term negative impact of some healthcare reform proposals pending in Congress on the U.S. fiscal deficit, there has been scant attention paid to the potential impact of the recently enacted stimulus bill on the long-term deficit. This article identifies and discusses the policies contained within the American Recovery and reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA, P.L. 111-5) that are likely to become permanent and attempts to quantify their cost. I identify more than $130 billion in annual increased spending or tax reductions likely to materialize an annual deficit increase of more than $130 billion from the extension of policies initiated in ARRA.

B. Overview of the Stimulus Bill

ARRA was signed into law on February 17, 2009. The final conference report to the agreement passed the House 246 to 183 and passed the Senate 60 to 38. The bill, intended to provide a fast-acting and temporary economic stimulus to the economy, contains a mix of tax cuts and spending increases. The major categories within the bill include $288 billion in tax cuts, $144 billion in transfers to the states, and $357 billion in federal spending. The three-year cumulative deficit impact of the bill is $719 billion, the seven-year impact is $809 billion, and after that the bill actually reduces the deficit by about $7 billion a year. The bill is widely cited as costing $787 billion, the 10-year cumulative deficit impact. I estimate that the average annual impact of the bill through fiscal 2011 (excluding the one-time $70 billion alternative minimum tax patch) to be $250 billion per year.1 Table 1 on the following page (reproduced from the Congressional Budget Office report) summarizes the budget impact of the bill.

C. Estimating the Long-Run Impact of ARRA

The intent of this article is not to devise a precise estimate of the cost of future policy but rather to demonstrate that the long-run budgetary impact of the stimulus bill will be larger than generally reported--in fact, it will be larger than that of current healthcare reform proposals. To estimate the impact of the stimulus bill as a result of the likely permanent extension of some policies, I undertook a simple two-step process. I first determine whether the policy is likely to be extended and, if so, then estimate an approximate annual budget impact of the extended policy.

Click here to view the full text of this article as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Alex Brill is a research fellow at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Alex
Brill
  • Alex Brill, a former policy director and chief economist of the House Ways and Means Committee, also served on the staff of the President's Council of Economic Advisers (CEA). In Congress and at the CEA, Mr. Brill worked on a variety of economic and legislative policy issues, including dividend taxation, the alternative minimum tax, international tax policy, social security reform, defined benefit pension reform, and U.S. trade policy.

    At AEI, Mr. Brill studies the impact of tax policy in the U.S. economy; the fiscal, economic, and political consequences of stimulus legislation; health care reform, pharmaceutical spending, unemployment insurance reform; and financial innovation and technology.
  • Phone: 202-862-5931
    Email: alex.brill@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Veronika Polakova
    Phone: 202-862-4880
    Email: veronika.polakova@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image How to beat Memorial Day traffic forever
image Bernanke stumbles, markets react
image Don't edit the First Amendment
image Home Economics
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 27
    MON
  • 28
    TUE
  • 29
    WED
  • 30
    THU
  • 31
    FRI
Wednesday, May 29, 2013 | 4:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.
Solar radiation management: An evolving climate policy option

As the controversy over climate policy has grown, it has been said that greenhouse gas (GHG) control is too hard but solar radiation management (SRM) is too easy. Join AEI for a discussion of the potential economic benefits, as well as the risks of SRM with Lee Lane, J. Eric Bickel and Nobel Laureate Thomas Schelling. A reception will follow.

Thursday, May 30, 2013 | 12:00 p.m. – 2:15 p.m.
Public employee pensions: How large are the deficits? What changes can be made?

At this event, panelists will address pension reform challenges by presenting the results of three research papers commissioned by AEI through a generous grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation.

Friday, May 31, 2013 | 9:15 a.m. – 11:15 a.m.
Long-term care: Markets or mandates?

Mark Warshawsky, a well-known expert in retirement finance and a newly appointed commissioner, will explain the implications of a publicly funded long-term care insurance program. Then a panel will debate whether another government program the best way to ensure that families can afford to provide the necessary services for their aging loved ones.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.