Centerfold Senator Is Stud on Economics as Well

Before and since Scott Brown locked up his Senate victory in Massachusetts, Democrats have tried to portray him as an economically illiterate radical.

Senator Charles Schumer of New York distributed a fundraising appeal that called Brown a "far-right tea bagger," an accusation that rose to a chorus after his election. Among serious followers of policy, it didn't help Brown that he once posed nude for Cosmopolitan magazine.

The special election in Massachusetts sprung on everyone so quickly that somebody crazy certainly could have slipped through the cracks. A look at Brown's platform and economic statements suggests exactly the opposite.

Brown has called mounting government deficits "immoral," which means that cutting them will likely be a high priority for him and that he is unlikely to compromise on the debt in order to lower taxes.

If a nonpartisan, above-reproach economist were assigned to review the academic literature and design thoughtful and prudent economic policies consistent with the most persuasive findings available, he would produce Brown's platform.

Brown's recipe for economic revival relies on the power of free enterprise. He told the Wall Street Journal's Peggy Noonan: "What made America great? Free markets, free enterprise, manufacturing, job creation. That's how we're gonna do it, not by enlarging government."

This quote contains two powerful assertions: that free enterprise made this nation great and that enlarging our government will undermine our growth. A third key element of Brown's political rhetoric has been to attack the ever-rising government debt as a threat to our economic future.

The economic literature overwhelmingly supports these points.

Hungry Government

Numerous studies have documented that larger government relative to gross domestic product leads to significantly reduced economic growth. One study by Harvard University economist Robert Barro concluded that "growth is inversely related to the share of government consumption in GDP."

More recent literature has found that this holds true even for U.S. states. It is now widely accepted as an economic reality--which makes it all the more puzzling that Obama and his economic team would push for a larger government when the economy is already weak.

As for the power of free enterprise, the Fraser Institute's annual Economic Freedom of the World report regularly documents that competition and entrepreneurship are key drivers of economic growth.

Fine, you might say, but reducing debt in the beginning of a wobbly recovery would be imprudent. This view assumes that the reduction would be designed poorly, front-loading the cut in government spending.

Take Your Time

It is easy to craft policies that reduce spending gradually over many years, restoring the budget to something fiscally sustainable without creating a near-term crater. Economists Francesco Giavazzi of Bocconi University in Milan and Marco Pagano of the University of Naples Federico II studied the impact of such policies in Denmark and Ireland and found that fiscal consolidations lead to near-term dramatic improvements in economic growth. Other studies have confirmed this result in a range of countries.

Brown also argues, citing John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, that "by cutting taxes we stimulate economic growth and encourage businesses to add jobs." He has advocated extending all of George W. Bush's tax cuts from 2001 and 2003 that are set to expire this year. He has also said that he supports a 15 percent "across-the-board tax cut," including corporate and payroll taxes.

Bush's Targets

Here the evidence is mixed. It is impossible to read the corporate tax literature and not come away with the impression that a reduction would be quite favorable economically. But the evidence that the Bush tax cuts were a positive influence is weak, in part because Bush squandered revenue on economically questionable targets, such as eliminating the so-called marriage penalty, rather than on lowering marginal rates. Still, Brown's focus on rates suggests that he understands this.

There is also a tension between the desire to reduce taxes and the desire to reduce the deficit. Brown has called mounting government deficits "immoral," which means that cutting them will likely be a high priority for him and that he is unlikely to compromise on the debt in order to lower taxes. His call for strict spending limits also suggests debt is his priority--and also is in accord with the prevailing literature.

A 2008 European Commission staff review of successful fiscal consolidations found that those that relied on spending cuts worked, while those that relied on tax increases did not. It's safe to say that higher marginal tax rates quashed growth.

All of this makes a great deal of common sense, appealing even to voters in the bluest of blue states. That is why Brown won. It is also why the anti-free-market, economically illiterate economists and pundits attacking Brown are beside themselves.

Kevin A. Hassett is a senior fellow and the director of economic policy studies at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Kevin A.
Hassett
  • Kevin A. Hassett is the State Farm James Q. Wilson Chair in American Politics and Culture at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). He is also a resident scholar and AEI's director of economic policy studies.



    Before joining AEI, Hassett was a senior economist at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and an associate professor of economics and finance at Columbia (University) Business School. He served as a policy consultant to the US Department of the Treasury during the George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton administrations.

    Hassett has also been an economic adviser to presidential candidates since 2000, when he became the chief economic adviser to Senator John McCain during that year's presidential primaries. He served as an economic adviser to the George W. Bush 2004 presidential campaign, a senior economic adviser to the McCain 2008 presidential campaign, and an economic adviser to the Mitt Romney 2012 presidential campaign.

    Hassett is the author or editor of many books, among them "Rethinking Competitiveness" (2012), "Toward Fundamental Tax Reform" (2005), "Bubbleology: The New Science of Stock Market Winners and Losers" (2002), and "Inequality and Tax Policy" (2001). He is also a columnist for National Review and has written for Bloomberg.

    Hassett frequently appears on Bloomberg radio and TV, CNBC, CNN, Fox News Channel, NPR, and "PBS NewsHour," among others. He is also often quoted by, and his opinion pieces have been published in, the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post.

    Hassett has a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Pennsylvania and a B.A. in economics from Swarthmore College.

  • Phone: 202-862-7157
    Email: khassett@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Emma Bennett
    Phone: 202-862-5862
    Email: emma.bennett@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image Dad and the diploma: The difference fathers make for college graduation
image A better way to finance that college degree
image Fracking for bigger budgets
image Earth Day: Hail fossil fuels, energy of the future
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.