Wal-Mart and the legal bribery problem in the United States

Article Highlights

  • Yes, we need to reduce dishonesty and corruption among our corporations, but we should look to our political class as well

    Tweet This

  • US is 24th on its Corruption Perceptions Index; that puts it behind Qatar and Chile and barely ahead of Uruguay

    Tweet This

The stock market walloped Wal-Mart after publication of a big New York Times expose alleging bribery and a cover-up tied to its Mexico operations. Investors knocked almost 5% off its shares in trading Monday, while the broader market was down only 1%.

And make no mistake, the Times’ report does look pretty damning for the Bentonville, Ark. retailing behemoth. While Wal-Mart deserves a chance to respond and the benefit of any doubt, if employees at Wal-Mart broke laws, they should be punished. Regardless of the norms at work in developing countries, American multinationals must not bend the rules when trying to expand.

Wal-Mart is accused of paying politicians and other politically powerful figures to help approve new stores in Mexico. But while we’re on the topic of companies having to pay the politically powerful for access to markets, can we stop for a moment to examine how things sometimes get done right here in the United States? It’s not uncommon for big box retailers to pony up cash and other unearned benefits in order to break new ground on stores.; what’s different here, however, is that members of our political class often force them to do it. And it’s all perfectly legal.

Consider a recent bill in Maryland, where I live, aimed at big box retailers. Firms like Wal-Mart, Costco, and others hoping to expand operations in wealthy Montgomery County, just outside Washington DC, would be forced to negotiate legally-binding “community benefits agreements” as a condition for building and operating new stores. These sorts of bills are not uncommon when big retailers want to expand or enter into new markets.

The upshot is that politically well-connected local stakeholders – unions, community organizers, and other interest groups – get cash, hiring promises, and other benefits from the retailer in exchange for dropping any opposition to a new store.

Among the possible benefits are “assistance to community organizations and programs.” These organizations can, in turn, use this “assistance” to support the political candidates who push this kind of legislation in the first place.

It’s not bribery, of course; but it’s corrupt nonetheless; and too often it’s politics as usual when it comes to major urban area retail and development markets.

"It’s hard to see how these sorts of political shakedowns of super stores are good for the public interest. They enrich the politically connected while likely breeding cynicism among consumers and voters."     Nick SchulzRegardless of what one thinks of Wal-Mart in particular, or big box retailing generally – I’m in the camp thinking the objective data say Wal-Mart is a long run force for good in society – it’s hard to see how these sorts of political shakedowns of super stores are good for the public interest. They enrich the politically connected while likely breeding cynicism among consumers and voters. It’s a kind of corrupt crony capitalism that does nothing to advance the general welfare and everything to reward those who see politics as a game for extracting rents, rewarding friends, and punishing enemies.

The United States remains one of the least corrupt countries on the planet. But the U.S has room to improve. According to Transparency International (TI), the US is 24th on its Corruption Perceptions Index. That puts the U.S. behind Qatar and Chile and barely ahead of Uruguay (and not much ahead of Botswana).

The Team at TI says “Public sector governance that puts the interests of its citizens first is a responsibility that transcends borders. Governments must act accordingly. For their part, citizens need to continue demanding better performance from their leaders.” So while we need honest dealing from our corporations as they look to expand around the world, we need the same from our political class as well.

Nick Schulz  the DeWitt Wallace Fellow at AEI and editor-in-chief of American.com

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Nick
Schulz

  • Nick Schulz was the DeWitt Wallace Fellow at AEI and editor-in-chief of American.com, AEI's online magazine focusing on business, economics, and public affairs. He writes the “Economics 2.0” column for Forbes.com where he analyzes technology, innovation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. He is the co-author with Arnold Kling of From Poverty to Prosperity: Intangible Assets, Hidden Liabilities, and the Lasting Triumph Over Scarcity. He has been published widely in newspapers and magazines around the country, including The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, the Los Angeles Times, USA Today, and Slate.


  • Phone: 202-862-5911
    Email: nick.schulz@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image The Census Bureau and Obamacare: Dumb decision? Yes. Conspiracy? No.
image A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
image Give the CBO long-range tools
image The coming collapse of India's communists
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.