Coal has a future in Michigan

Shutterstock.com

Article Highlights

  • Think the days of coal plants in Michigan are numbered? Not so fast.

    Tweet This

  • Coal is a cheap energy option accounting for 40% of electricity generated and nearly 50% of the power in Michigan.

    Tweet This

  • Absent a change in policy, utilities will be forced to continue the switch from coal to high-priced natural gas to meet plant-by-plant emission limits.

    Tweet This

Think the days of coal plants in Michigan are numbered? Not so fast.

Notwithstanding challenges from environmental groups, our nation’s success with innovative technologies for increasing the efficiency of new power plants will keep coal in the energy mix for decades to come.

Coal is among our cheapest energy options, accounting for 40 percent of the nation’s electricity generating capacity and nearly 50 percent of the power in Michigan. By using advanced clean-coal systems like ultra-supercritical pulverized coal technology we can increase power-plant efficiency by as much as 50 percent compared to conventional coal plants.

The most advanced of these pulverized coal plants use 50 percent less fuel for the same power generation and emit 50 percent less carbon dioxide.

Witness the success of American Electric Power Co.’s Turk power plant in Arkansas, the nation’s first ultra-supercritical coal unit.

The 600-megawatt plant was built in four years, despite legal challenges from environmentalists, and began commercial operation in 2012.

Along with other clean-coal technologies that achieve higher efficiencies, the advantage of ultra-supercritical coal units is drawing growing interest globally because of the role they play in lessening coal’s carbon footprint.

But there is a threat hanging over the use of coal in the United States.

The Environmental Protection Agency has placed restrictions on greenhouse-gas emissions from new coal plants that no technology currently available could meet, not even ultra-supercritical coal systems or modern coal gasification plants. And, if you think that mandate is unrealistic, there’s more to come.

The agency is preparing to impose greenhouse-gas regulations on the nation’s more than 550 operating coal plants later this year.

The EPA’s actions constitute bad policy. Under its rule to control greenhouse-gas emissions from new power plants, the EPA would require something that doesn’t exist as a commercial technology.

This is sequestration, a complex process that involves capturing the carbon dioxide produced by coal combustion, transporting the gas to sites where it would be injected underground and burying it in deep geological formations, such as saline aquifers.

In a way, the foolishness of the EPA’s approach symbolizes its nonsensical pursuit of carbon-free energy production. In the name of environmentalism, the EPA is making bad policy based on emotionalism and a myopic view of what works and doesn’t work in the real world.

Congress needs to address the EPA’s absurd carbon policy and it should direct the agency to base greenhouse-gas emission standards for power plants on technology that is proven and commercially available.

Absent a change in policy, utilities will be forced to continue the switch from coal to high-priced natural gas to meet plant-by-plant emission limits.

Maintaining a diverse mix of energy sources, including coal and nuclear power, for base-load power delivered 24/7 would protect consumers from high gas prices.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Mark J.
Perry

What's new on AEI

In year four of Dodd-Frank, over-regulation is getting old
image Halbig v. Burwell: A stunning rebuke of a lawless and reckless administration
image Beware all the retirement 'crisis' reports
image Cut people or change how they're paid
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Monday, July 21, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Closing the gaps in health outcomes: Alternative paths forward

Please join us for a broader exploration of targeted interventions that provide real promise for reducing health disparities, limiting or delaying the onset of chronic health conditions, and improving the performance of the US health care system.

Monday, July 21, 2014 | 4:00 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.
Comprehending comprehensive universities

Join us for a panel discussion that seeks to comprehend the comprehensives and to determine the role these schools play in the nation’s college completion agenda.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014 | 8:50 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Who governs the Internet? A conversation on securing the multistakeholder process

Please join AEI’s Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy for a conference to address key steps we can take, as members of the global community, to maintain a free Internet.

Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Expanding opportunity in America: A conversation with House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan

Please join us as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) unveils a new set of policy reforms aimed at reducing poverty and increasing upward mobility throughout America.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 6:00 p.m. – 7:15 p.m.
Is it time to end the Export-Import Bank?

We welcome you to join us at AEI as POLITICO’s Ben White moderates a lively debate between Tim Carney, one of the bank’s fiercest critics, and Tony Fratto, one of the agency’s staunchest defenders.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.