A new breed of supercarriers gives US a super chance to retain naval supremacy

Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Joshua J. Wahl

CVN 78 (Gerald R Ford) at the shipyard during the initial filling of the drydock.

Article Highlights

  • Naval presence matters

    Tweet This

  • A favorable military imbalance of power is the most cost-effective use of US forces

    Tweet This

  • How can the nation not afford to invest in a fleet of new carriers?

    Tweet This

A decade of counterinsurgency and counter-terror operations has created doubts about the utility of the aircraft carrier. Today’s budget cuts threaten to shrink the Navy’s carrier force — already reduced from eleven to ten — to as few as eight or nine.

Yet whether in a direct or supporting role, aircraft carriers have taken part in almost every U.S. major military operation since the Second World War.  They have served as diplomatic tools to ratchet up or ease political pressure.  They have given our military unparalleled freedom of action to respond to a range of requirements.  They have supported several missions simultaneously, guaranteed access to any region in the world, and reduced the nation’s reliance on others for basing rights.

If the U.S. Navy is to continue to secure the high seas, trade routes and shipping lanes around the globe long into the 21st century, it needs a robust fleet — both in quantity and quality.

The new Ford-class carriers are an important step toward this goal.  The first — the USS Gerald R. Ford — is scheduled for christening on November 9.  Called by the Navy “true ‘leap ahead’” ships, the Ford-class features important advances to project power over the course of the century it is expected to remain in service.

The carriers’ electromagnetic aircraft launching system and advanced arresting gear will allow them to operate planes heavily loaded with weapons and fuel.

In addition to a new dual-band radar, a larger flight deck and improved ordnance elevators, the Ford class emphasizes automation and maintenance, which will reduce operating costs.

While analysts rightly point to potential threats to carriers such as anti-ship missiles, the U.S. is not the only country investing in aircraft carriers.

As of 2012, about a dozen nations operate carriers of one form or another.  While the size, capabilities and effectiveness of these vessels vary widely, the fact that India, China, Brazil and Thailand enter and stay in the aircraft carrier business speaks to the ship’s continued utility both in peacetime and war.

As states like China modernize their navies and acquire more advanced capabilities, they implicitly threaten America’s long-standing maritime supremacy.

This is especially troublesome because despite America’s overall superiority at sea, conceivable future battles would likely force America to play an “away game.” Nearby enemy forces would enjoy large numerical advantages at first, whereas American forces in theater would have to make do until the arrival of reinforcements.

This “away game” dilemma is especially vexing because of the growing role that smaller and less survivable ships are playing in America’s navy.  An increasing number of more vulnerable ships results in an overall naval balance likely to be less favorable in the future than it has been in the past.

A military balanced tilted in America’s favor is the most cost-effective use of military power.  While Americans hope not to have to defeat a capable military anytime soon, the best way to win any future conflict is not to fight one at all.  A robust defense investment to keep a military gap in America’s favor would achieve this goal.

While aircraft carriers are under increased risks due to increasing global capabilities, the solution is not to capitulate.  Rather, the U.S. needs to leverage its own technological advantages for creative solutions.

Potential game-changing developments in directed energy and unmanned aviation may go a long way towards extending the military lifespan of carriers and other surface combatants.  The key is to do what Americans do best: create innovative solutions.

The real question is not whether aircraft carriers are floating relics but how can the nation not afford to invest in a fleet of new super-carriers?

Mackenzie Eaglen is a resident fellow in the Marilyn Ware Center for Security Studies 

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Mackenzie
Eaglen
  • Mackenzie Eaglen has worked on defense issues in the U.S. Congress, both House and Senate, and at the Pentagon in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and on the Joint Staff. She specializes in defense strategy, budget, military readiness and the defense industrial base. In 2010, Ms. Eaglen served as a staff member of the congressionally mandated Quadrennial Defense Review Independent Panel, a bipartisan, blue-ribbon commission established to assess the Pentagon's major defense strategy. A prolific writer on defense related issues, she has also testified before Congress.


     


    Follow Mackenzie Eaglen on Twitter.

  • Phone: (202) 862-7183
    Email: mackenzie.eaglen@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Charles Morrison
    Phone: (202) 862-5945
    Email: charles.morrison@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image Getting it right: US national security policy and al Qaeda since 2011
image Net neutrality rundown: What the NPRM means for you
image The Schuette decision
image Snatching failure from victory in Afghanistan
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Event Registration is Closed
Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

Event Registration is Closed
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.