Defense fact check

Defending Defense: Defense fact-check

Download PDF
“Governor Romney’s plan calls for…$2 trillion in additional military spending that the military hasn’t asked for.”  —President Obama, First Presidential Debate, October 3, 2012

The president has repeatedly attacked Governor Romney’s plan to restore baseline military budgets to roughly 4 percent of domestic product as unnecessary spending that the Joint Chiefs of Staff don’t want.  In the vice presidential debate, Joe Biden went even further, claiming it was the service leaders who “made the recommendation first” to make the latest round of cuts, which total almost $500 billion. “That’s a fact,” asserted the vice president.

No, it’s not.

The fact is that this round of defense cuts was first proposed by President Obama on April 13, 2011.  In an attempt to preempt the budget-cutting fervor of the House of Representatives’ Republican leadership, he said he would trim roughly $400 billion from the defense plan that he had submitted to Congress in February 2011.  The president did not even inform Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who was set to retire that June, about the proposed cuts.

And no wonder.  Secretary Gates had already declared his opposition to such an approach: “Suggestions to cut defense by this or that large number have largely become exercises in simple math, divorced from serious considerations of capabilities, risk, and the level of resources needed to protect this country's security and vital interests around the world.”

And so President Obama has, conveniently, rewritten the standard of military strategy to conform to his defense-budget-cutting desires.  But as The Washington Post has observed, the president’s defense guidance rests “upon the dubious assumption that there will be no need to fight land wars in the coming decade … The shrinking Navy, in turn, is at odds with Mr. Obama’s strategy of building up forces in Asia against a belligerent China.” 

The Post also rightly pointed out that Governor Romney is simply proposing to “fully fund the four-year plan laid out by the Defense Department.”

In other words:  This “additional” spending previously was asked for by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and recommended to Congress by President Obama himself.

As commander-in-chief, President Obama has the prerogative to define U.S. defense strategy downward.  But he does not have the prerogative to define defense facts.  And he certainly should not hide behind the Joint Chiefs of Staff when he does so.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Thomas
Donnelly

 

Gary J.
Schmitt

 

Mackenzie
Eaglen
  • Mackenzie Eaglen has worked on defense issues in the U.S. Congress, both House and Senate, and at the Pentagon in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and on the Joint Staff. She specializes in defense strategy, budget, military readiness and the defense industrial base. In 2010, Ms. Eaglen served as a staff member of the congressionally mandated Quadrennial Defense Review Independent Panel, a bipartisan, blue-ribbon commission established to assess the Pentagon's major defense strategy. A prolific writer on defense related issues, she has also testified before Congress.


     


    Follow Mackenzie Eaglen on Twitter.

  • Phone: (202) 862-7183
    Email: mackenzie.eaglen@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Charles Morrison
    Phone: (202) 862-5945
    Email: charles.morrison@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image The Census Bureau and Obamacare: Dumb decision? Yes. Conspiracy? No.
image A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
image Give the CBO long-range tools
image The coming collapse of India's communists
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.