The message in the mush

Reuters

U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel gives a speech on fiscal defense spending at Ft. McNair in Washington April 3, 2013.

Article Highlights

  • Beneath the ritual do-more-with-less incantation was the confession that, in fact, the Obama Doctrine is really to do less with less.

    Tweet This

  • The “fundamental change” in store is the retreat of the American military from its forward stations, particularly in the Middle East.

    Tweet This

  • Efficiency doesn't win wars. Effectiveness wins wars.

    Tweet This

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel’s address to the National Defense University today, hyped by the administration as a “strong message that the time has come for [the Department of Defense] to consider fundamental change in how it is organized and how it operates to better reflect 21st century strategic and fiscal realities” turned out to be a bit of a wet noodle.  Any time a “reform” agenda begins with Eisenhower references – the “Solarium” review or the “New Look” program – it’s an indicator to the pabulum to follow. (No one ever seems to mention Ike’s strategy of “Massive Response” – that is, to nuke anyone who looked at us cross-eyed – which was the product of the review and the strategy that led to the New Look.)

But just beneath the ritual do-more-with-less incantation was the confession that, in fact, the Obama Doctrine is really to do less with less.  The “fundamental change” in store is the retreat of the American military from its forward stations, particularly in the Middle East.  This is what Hagel was chosen to do, and he again reiterated his “keen appreciation” of the limits of military power and the need to use it “judiciously,” which is to say use it less.  And he contrasted his planned approach to the Pentagon with that of the Reagan administration.  For Ronald Reagan, he lamented, “cost and efficiency were not major considerations.”  True.  Reagan was more concerned to win the Cold War.  He valued effectiveness over efficiency.

But the Hagel speech also heralds the start of process that will quantify and codify the extent of the Obama retreat.  As the secretary noted, he’s already initiated the “Strategic Choices and Management Review,” under which the Pentagon’s accountants will determine what strategy and force structures the plummeting levels of defense spending will allow.  A second indicator will be the release of the president’s budget 2014 budget, which in the case of the Pentagon will pretend that the problem of sequestration has disappeared – at least Hagel admits that the current sequester “is already having a disruptive and potentially damaging impact on the readiness of the force.”  Soon after will come the fifth Quadrennial Defense Review, if you count the 1993 Bottom-Up Review the sixth post-Cold War attempt to define America’s long-term defense requirements.  Deriving from Obama’s January 2012 “defense guidance,” Hagel’s QDR will chart the course for American military “retrenchment.”  Forces that are advancing do not want to “retrench,” they want to exploit; forces that are retreating are those that seek to retrench.

Actually, this will be the seventh attempt to retrench.  The process began with the first Bush administration’s 1992 “Base Force,” the purpose of which, as then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Colin Powell framed it, to “put a shingle outside our door saying, ‘Superpower Lives Here.’” Obama and Hagel are taking that one down.

 

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Thomas
Donnelly

What's new on AEI

image The Census Bureau and Obamacare: Dumb decision? Yes. Conspiracy? No.
image A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
image Give the CBO long-range tools
image The coming collapse of India's communists
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.