South Ossetia elections show Russia’s clout waning

Russia Presidential Press and Information Office

President of Russia Dmitry Medvedev meets with Eduard Kokoity, president or South Ossetia, on Aug. 13, 2010. Kokoity, a Kremlin ally, backed Anatoliy Bibilov, Dzhioyeva’s main opponent in the 2011 presidential election.

Article Highlights

  • The failure of South Ossetia’s presidential election and the popularity of Dzhioyeva have favorable implications for US

    Tweet This

  • If Russia can’t secure victory for its preferred candidate in South Ossetia, then its influence has declined drastically

    Tweet This

  • The election turmoil in South Ossetia more than anything illustrates the Kremlin’s waning regional influence

    Tweet This

Officials in the Georgian breakaway province of South Ossetia, whose independence is recognized by Russia and only a handful of other countries, annulled the results of the territory’s presidential election earlier this week. The South Ossetian Supreme Court charged opposition candidate Alla Dzhioyeva with vague electoral violations and prohibited her from standing in a repeat presidential election rescheduled for March. Dzhioyeva — an anti-corruption crusader and former education minister — had an almost insurmountable 17 point lead over her rival, based on results from 74 of 85 precincts. She declared victory on Wednesday and announced that unless the Supreme Court accepts her appeal, the current government “will be [held] responsible for further developments.”

"The election turmoil in South Ossetia perhaps more than anything illustrates the Kremlin’s waning regional influence." --Daniel VajdicPolitical instability in a pseudo-state with a population of 60,000 doesn’t justify any substantial attention, and rigged and subsequently contested elections are a common occurrence in the former Soviet Union. But the failure of South Ossetia’s presidential election and the popularity of Dzhioyeva are indicative of broader trends that have significant, largely favorable consequences for the U.S. It’s remarkable that Dzhioyeva’s Kremlin-backed rival couldn’t secure an honest victory under free and fair conditions despite receiving a clear endorsement from Russian president Dmitry Medvedev. Moscow went to war with Georgia to “save” South Ossetia in 2008, recognized it as an independent country, and spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually subsidizing its budget and its virtually nonexistent economy.

The election turmoil in South Ossetia perhaps more than anything illustrates the Kremlin’s waning regional influence. Russia’s relations with Ukraine improved when Viktor Yanukovych became president but remain highly unstable below the surface. Ditto for Belarus. Minsk’s recent rapprochement with Moscow is the result of Aleksander Lukashenko’s international isolation, the country’s severe economic challenges, and its dependence on reduced natural-gas prices for survival — not Belarus’s genuine desire to improve ties.

The Kremlin’s “managed democracy” may be the favored model of corrupt, autocratic elites throughout the former Soviet Union, but this week’s events in South Ossetia demonstrate that the people of these countries prefer an unqualified form of democracy. If Russia can’t manage to secure victory for its preferred candidate in a neighboring protectorate, then its influence has declined much more drastically than previously thought.

Daniel Vajdic is a research assistant at AEI

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine

What's new on AEI

AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters
image A nation divided by marriage
image Teaching reform
image Socialist party pushing $20 minimum wage defends $13-an-hour job listing
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 27
    MON
  • 28
    TUE
  • 29
    WED
  • 30
    THU
  • 31
    FRI
Monday, October 27, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
State income taxes and the Supreme Court: Maryland Comptroller v. Wynne

Please join AEI for a panel discussion exploring these and other questions about this crucial case.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014 | 9:30 a.m. – 12:15 p.m.
For richer, for poorer: How family structures economic success in America

Join Lerman, Wilcox, and a group of distinguished scholars and commentators for the release of Lerman and Wilcox’s report, which examines the relationships among and policy implications of marriage, family structure, and economic success in America.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014 | 5:30 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.
The 7 deadly virtues: 18 conservative writers on why the virtuous life is funny as hell

Please join AEI for a book forum moderated by Last and featuring five of these leading conservative voices. By the time the forum is over, attendees may be on their way to discovering an entirely different — and better — moral universe.

Thursday, October 30, 2014 | 2:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
A nuclear deal with Iran? Weighing the possibilities

Join us, as experts discuss their predictions for whether the United States will strike a nuclear deal with Iran ahead of the November 24 deadline, and the repercussions of the possible outcomes.

Thursday, October 30, 2014 | 5:00 p.m. – 6:15 p.m.
The forgotten depression — 1921: The crash that cured itself

Please join Author James Grant and AEI senior economists for a discussion about Grant's book, "The Forgotten Depression: 1921: The Crash That Cured Itself" (Simon & Schuster, 2014).

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.