Speak up about Mexican drug violence

Knight Foundation

Hundreds of Mexican journalists silently marched in downtown Mexico City in protest of the kidnappings, murder and violence against their peers throughout the country, Aug. 7, 2010.

Article Highlights

  • Will GOP candidates discuss Mexico’s bloody drug violence in tonight’s #CNNDebate? @RogerNoriega

    Tweet This

  • Mexicans wonder why they pay such a high price to fight the drug trade that services the insatiable US demand for drugs

    Tweet This

  • Mexican drug trafficking organizations constitute the largest organized crime threat in the US

    Tweet This

Republican presidential candidates have had little constructive to say on the issue of the bloody drug violence in neighboring Mexico.  They can change that as they meet to debate on Tuesday night.

President Obama’s Mexico strategy picked up where the Bush-era “Merida Plan” package left off.  It  amounts to “less of the same,” as U.S. law enforcement and community development support is delivered in dribs and drabs.  In 2012, if Mexicans choose a new president who decides to end the anti-drug offensive, we may wish that we had done more to support our Mexican allies when we had the chance.

Outgoing President Felipe Calderon launched a frontal offensive against criminal syndicates five years ago, enlisting the military alongside outgunned civilian police.  Although the vast majority of the 35,000 deaths in recent years are the result of criminal turf wars, most innocent Mexicans are beleaguered by insecurity and violence.  Many Mexicans wonder why they are paying such a high price to fight the illicit drug trade that services the insatiable demand for drugs in the United States – particularly when U.S. policy makers appear either indifferent or worse to their plight.

"One of the great developments of this 21st Century will be if Mexico can emerge from this and really grow economically."—Senator Marco Rubio

Republicans who were among the most enthusiastic backers of “Plan Colombia,” which channeled about $5 billion in U.S. aid to help that South American nation get the upper hand on narco-terrorist guerrilla groups.  A decade later, cocaine cultivation and criminality have declined dramatically in Colombia.  The Republicans who helped forge that successful strategy have been absent when it comes to backing Mexico’s unprecedented efforts to deal with drug corruption.

Indeed, conservative commentators tend to conflate concerns over illegal immigration with the drug violence issue.  Rather than crediting the Mexican government for having the courage to end de facto truces with drug gangs, some observers have heaped scorn on corruption in Mexico and spoken of closing the border – as if a quarantine were needed to protect Americans from this lawlessness.

Nonsense.  According to the U.S. Justice Department, drug trafficking organizations of Mexico constitute the largest organized crime threat in the United States. So Calderon, his military, his cops, and his people are literally fighting the same beast that menaces U.S. communities.  However, far from treating Mexico as an ally, the political class in the United States ignores or impugns the sacrifice our southern neighbor is making.

Two leading Mexican presidential candidates have given hints recently about what they might do regarding the “drug war.”  Enrique Peña Nieto of the center-left Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), which governed Mexico for seven decades until losing power in 2000, told an audience at Washington’s Woodrow Wilson Institute that he would learn from Calderon’s strategy and deploy “a much more focused and effective public security strategy.”  Although Peña Nieto affirmed Calderon’s use of the military as “correct and appropriate,” he also said the army should be replaced gradually by civilian police in carrying out the anti-drug mission.  Leftist candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador was more specific, pledging that the military would return to their bases within six months under his presidency.

Although these opposition candidates were relatively cautious in their commentary about Calderon’s unpopular strategy, many wonder whether any successor would prosecute this anti-drug offensive with the same intensity.  Mexico might be more likely to do so if it could count on greater material and moral support from the United States – both Republicans and Democrats.

Republicans have some catching up to do.  Florida’s junior senator Marco Rubio seems to understand this, judging from his comments at a televised Politico interview last week. “Mexico deserves better. Mexico has all the conditions necessary to be prosperous and to provide great opportunities for its people," Rubio said.  “In order for us to have the moral standing on this issue, we have to do a better job of dealing with U.S. drug consumption."

Senator Rubio, whom many consider a front-runner in the GOP’s vice-presidential sweepstakes despite his disinterest in the post, spoke with characteristic vision about U.S.-Mexican relations.

"One of the great developments of this 21st Century will be if Mexico can emerge from this and really grow economically.  Imagine the United States bordered by Mexico in the south and Canada in the north – two free and prosperous nations – and what it would be mean for us as a nation and as a people.  I think that is what the Mexican people want, and I think we should be helping them in that regard in any way we can."

We will see in the days and weeks ahead if any Republican presidential candidate can summon up the courage to speak with common sense about Mexico, or about anything else.

Roger F. Noriega is a visiting fellow at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine

What's new on AEI

AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters
image A nation divided by marriage
image Teaching reform
image Socialist party pushing $20 minimum wage defends $13-an-hour job listing
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
Monday, October 27, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
State income taxes and the Supreme Court: Maryland Comptroller v. Wynne

Please join AEI for a panel discussion exploring these and other questions about this crucial case.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014 | 9:30 a.m. – 12:15 p.m.
For richer, for poorer: How family structures economic success in America

Join Lerman, Wilcox, and a group of distinguished scholars and commentators for the release of Lerman and Wilcox’s report, which examines the relationships among and policy implications of marriage, family structure, and economic success in America.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014 | 5:30 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.
The 7 deadly virtues: 18 conservative writers on why the virtuous life is funny as hell

Please join AEI for a book forum moderated by Last and featuring five of these leading conservative voices. By the time the forum is over, attendees may be on their way to discovering an entirely different — and better — moral universe.

Thursday, October 30, 2014 | 2:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
A nuclear deal with Iran? Weighing the possibilities

Join us, as experts discuss their predictions for whether the United States will strike a nuclear deal with Iran ahead of the November 24 deadline, and the repercussions of the possible outcomes.

Thursday, October 30, 2014 | 5:00 p.m. – 6:15 p.m.
The forgotten depression — 1921: The crash that cured itself

Please join Author James Grant and AEI senior economists for a discussion about Grant's book, "The Forgotten Depression: 1921: The Crash That Cured Itself" (Simon & Schuster, 2014).

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.