A return to the bad old days

Reuters

Supporters of Egypt's army chief General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi holds a poster of Sisi in Tahrir square in Cairo, on the third anniversary of Egypt's uprising, January 25, 2014.

Article Highlights

  • Now Egypt has returned to status quo ante, the very recipe that began this manic swing from military strongman to Islamists and back.

    Tweet This

  • The Muslim Brotherhood has given democracy a bad name; Mubarak did the same for authoritarianism.

    Tweet This

  • Egypt will lead the return to the bad old days. Unfortunately, we are well aware how they ended, and will end again.

    Tweet This

By any standard, last July’s military takeover in Egypt was a coup d’etat, with security forces unseating a legitimately elected government. That both the Egyptians and the Obama administration insist it was not a coup is a self-serving exercise in semantic jujitsu and does not alter the facts. Better to have called it a deserved coup, or popular regime change; Morsi had managed to marry the worst elements of intolerant Islamism with the hoary tradition of Egyptian incompetence, and in so doing allowed Al Qaeda onto Egyptian territory, rekindled sectarian animosity, denied Egyptians the security they had come to expect and failed to deliver on promised economic reforms.

Now Egypt has returned to status quo ante, the very recipe that began this manic swing from military strongman to Islamists and back. And it’s a mistake. Field Marshal Abdul Fattah el-Sisi, who Monday earned the endorsement of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces to run for president in as yet unscheduled elections, fashions himself a Nasser-like figure, a latter-day savior. But the post-coup evidence thus far is of a regression to the Mubarak era and worse: A constitution that allows for little dissent, a military veto on “security” matters, little latitude for nongovernment organizations and none of the freedoms that brought the Egyptian masses into Tahrir Square.

The Muslim Brotherhood has given democracy a bad name; Mubarak did the same for authoritarianism. Is there no freedom in Egypt’s future? If the Middle East is ever to emerge from the dark ages of dictatorship, there must be a transition -- a first step away from the kings, ayatollahs, emirs and presidents-for-life that have tyrannized hundreds of millions of Arabs and Persians. What is that transition? Some believed a chastened Muslim Brotherhood would embrace a new pragmatism. Others hoped that the liberals who fueled so much of the Arab Spring could translate their protest movements into political leadership. Neither was right. And so Egypt will lead the return to the bad old days. Unfortunately, we are well aware how they ended, and will end again. And next time, whoever takes power will not be so easily ousted.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Danielle
Pletka

What's new on AEI

The Federal Reserve's policy dilemma
image Unemployment benefits barely soften the blow of joblessness
image Stop the US-China bilateral investment treaty talks
image US still has time to stake out a position of strength on Ukraine
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 18
    MON
  • 19
    TUE
  • 20
    WED
  • 21
    THU
  • 22
    FRI
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.