Iran's ayatollahs are again testing US resolve

Todd Frantom/US Navy

Gunner’s Mate 3rd Class Brenton Davis from Meadville, Pa., mans a .50-caliber machine gun on the ship‘s bow while transiting the Strait of Hormuz, while in transit to the Arabian Gulf.

Article Highlights

  • Iran's threats point to a dangerous year ahead for the US @AmbJohnBolton

    Tweet This

  • Tehran is testing Western resolve as it draws ever closer to a nuclear capacity

    Tweet This

  • Peaceful means will never persuade or prevent #Iran from reaching its nuclear objective

    Tweet This

Iran's threats to close the vital Strait of Hormuz, its naval exercises in nearby waters, and the ominous increase in tensions over its nuclear weapons program all point to a dangerous year ahead.

Even worse, Iran's belligerent rhetoric and behavior today only foreshadow its behavior once it becomes a nuclear weapon-armed state.

Iran undoubtedly wants to avoid further economic sanctions, and is threatening the weak and unstable global economy to magnify the potential effect of any interruption in vital oil shipments from the Gulf region.

"It has long been clear that, absent regime change in Tehran, peaceful means will never persuade or prevent Iran from reaching its nuclear objective, to which it is perilously close."--John Bolton

But more importantly, Tehran is testing Western resolve, especially Washington's, as it draws ever closer to a nuclear capacity.

How should America respond? As the U.S. Fifth Fleet did, saying "any disruption will not be tolerated." Significantly, however, President Obama has not spoken, once again signaling to the ayatollahs that his heart just isn't into standing up to them.

The president's continuing lack of leadership in response to Iran's saber rattling brings to mind the October 1961 Berlin Crisis. There, just a few months after the communists began constructing the Berlin Wall to stop the hemorrhaging of refugees from East Germany, a confrontation developed at the Cold War's iconic Checkpoint Charlie, located between the U.S. and Soviet sectors in Berlin.

American Patton tanks, armed and ready, stood tube to tube with Soviet tanks just a few yards away, as Berliners and the world held their breath. At one point, President Kennedy telephoned his personal representative in Berlin, Gen. Lucius Clay, hero of the 1948-49 Berlin Airlift, to hear Clay's assessment.

Kennedy closed their conversation by saying, "Don't lose your nerve." Clay famously shot back: "Mr. President, we're not worried about our nerves. We're worrying about those of you people in Washington."

Iran today may not be equivalent to the Soviet Union in 1961, but then again, Barack Obama is no John F. Kennedy. Iran will be watching every American reaction, especially as it sees the European Union once again on the verge of opening negotiations over the nuclear weapons program.

The Tehran regime has made incalculable progress over the past decade by using the European obsession, shared in many U.S. circles, that there is some satisfactory negotiated settlement to Iran's nuclear aspirations.

While the prior negotiations droned on inconclusively, Iran gained precious time to advance its nuclear weapons program, enhance its political legitimacy by appearing diplomatically "reasonable," and fend off stricter sanctions. Every indication is that Iran will unlimber this successful strategy yet again.

Iran's ingenious, decade-long response to the West's naivete reveals the basic flaw in the whole sanctions approach, especially Obama's. Economic sanctions against Iran were once intended to force it to give up its nuclear weapons program, but now the president's aim is for sanctions simply to get Iran back to the negotiating table.

And once there, what will happen? The race, on the one hand, between Iran's scientific and technological progress toward achieving a deliverable nuclear weapons capability, and, on the other, the possibility that diplomacy or sanctions can stop Iran from achieving that objective, is now in its final stages.

It has long been clear that, absent regime change in Tehran, peaceful means will never persuade or prevent Iran from reaching its nuclear objective, to which it is perilously close.

Indeed, viewed dispassionately, advocating diplomacy or sanctions, and believing they will actually impede Iran's nuclear program, simply provides cover for Iran to do just that.

Unfortunately, Iran is paying attention to Obama's weakness, and the weakness of the Europeans, not to the Fifth Fleet's unequivocal statements. Once again, as in Berlin in 1961, it is those nerves back in Washington we should be worrying about.

John R. Bolton is a senior fellow at AEI

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine

What's new on AEI

To secure southern border, US must lead international effort to stabilize Central America
image The Ryan pro-work, anti-poverty plan: Thomas Aquinas 1, Ayn Rand 0
image Does SNAP support work? Yes and no
image Obama Democrats lose their big bet on health exchanges
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 28
    MON
  • 29
    TUE
  • 30
    WED
  • 31
    THU
  • 01
    FRI
Tuesday, July 29, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Is Medicare’s future secure? The 2014 Trustees Report

Please join AEI as the chief actuary for Medicare summarizes the report’s results, followed by a panel discussion of what those spending trends are likely to mean for seniors, taxpayers, the health industry, and federal policy.

Friday, August 01, 2014 | 10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Watergate revisited: The reforms and the reality, 40 years later

Please join us as four of Washington’s most distinguished political observers will revisit the Watergate hearings and discuss reforms that followed.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.