9/11 and American guilt

White House/Chuck Kennedy

An honor guard displays a flag, which flew over ground zero in 2001 following the attacks, during a commemoration ceremony at the National September 11 Memorial in New York, N.Y., on the tenth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks against the United States, Sunday, Sept. 11, 2011.

Tomorrow marks the 11th anniversary of the al Qaeda attacks of 9/11. As we consider the lives lost, not just on 9/11 but since in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere, it’s time to lay waste to a special calumny that has gained prominence and entered the main stream from the fringes where it once resided: The notion of American guilt.

Ron Paul is the most prominent purveyor of this vile idea:

Just remember that immediately after 9/11, we removed the base in Saudi Arabia, our policies definitely had an influence [.] To argue the case they want to do us harm because we're free and prosperous I think is a very dangerous notion, because it's not true.

Doubling down on the idea that somehow America and American leaders were to blame, Paul recently claimed that if he had been in charge, no one would have died on 9/11. Paul has also kept company with 9/11 truthers who adhere to the notion that the U.S. government is covering up something – likely its own involvement – in the attacks. But let’s set that bit of crazy aside and stick with the “mainstream” notion that American foreign policy invited the 9/11 attacks.

Rand Paul, who once shied away from his father’s brand of fruitcake, has joined the bandwagon on the “blowback” theory that America is to blame when terrorists target us. And he’s pushing it hard, insisting that the future of the GOP is secure as long as the Paul foreign policy is at its heart, because everyone else in the party apparently wants to “bomb everybody tomorrow”.

Lest I err in blaming only one side of the political spectrum, the blowback notion has plenty of adherents – possibly more – on the Left.  And not just on the embarrassing Chomskyite fringes.

But no matter where these self-loathing types sit, the reality remains the reality. Does American foreign policy shape how others view us? Of course. When we are weak, others seek to capitalize on that weakness. When we fight, others fight back. But an attack on the United States, like attacks in Europe, attacks in Iraq, attacks in Afghanistan, attacks in Indonesia, and attacks throughout Africa, are central to al Qaeda's ideology and the battle they perceive they are in with the West and western liberalism. This is not a game of chess for the group, in which we move and they counter move. The notion that U.S. foreign policy shapes “invitations” for terrorists to attack on our soil – and the concomitant idea that if we had no foreign policy, there would be no attacks – is entirely mindless.

It’s time to put Ron Paul, truthers, blowbackers, and all the adherents of such ideas back where they belong… on the fringes of American life, wearing tin foil hats, writing irate letters to the White House, exchanging newsletters, and building shelters in their moms’ basements.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Danielle
Pletka

  • As a long-time Senate Committee on Foreign Relation senior professional staff member for the Near East and South Asia, Danielle Pletka was the point person on Middle East, Pakistan, India and Afghanistan issues. As the vice president for foreign and defense policy studies at AEI, Pletka writes on national security matters with a focus on Iran and weapons proliferation, the Middle East, Syria, Israel and the Arab Spring. She also studies and writes about South Asia: Pakistan, India and Afghanistan.


    Pletka is the co-editor of “Dissent and Reform in the Arab World: Empowering Democrats” (AEI Press, 2008) and the co-author of “Containing and Deterring a Nuclear Iran” (AEI Press, 2011) and “Iranian influence in the Levant, Egypt, Iraq, and Afghanistan” (AEI Press, 2012). Her most recent study, “America vs. Iran: The competition for the future of the Middle East,” was published in January 2014.


     


    Follow Danielle Pletka on Twitter.


  • Phone: 202-862-5943
    Email: dpletka@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Alexandra Della Rocchetta
    Phone: 202-862-7152
    Email: alex.dellarocchetta@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image The money in banking: Comparing salaries of bank and bank regulatory employees
image What Obama should say about China in Japan
image A key to college success: Involved dads
image China takes the fight to space
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.