More Health Care, but Less Government

In September 1993, after President Clinton spoke to the nation about his plans to reform its health care system, 59% of those surveyed by Gallup said they favored his plan. Over time, opinion moved sharply against it. By March 1994, more people opposed than supported it. The last time Gallup asked about the bill before it was officially declared dead in September 1994, 55% opposed it. Other polls from the time also showed opposition rising over the course of the debate.

This year, different polls have presented different pictures of the overall level of support for the current health care reform efforts in Congress. In recent months, for example, people have been evenly divided in the ABC News/Washington Post poll, but in the Pew Research Center's polls, opposition to the effort has outweighed support.

The weight of opinion today is on government as a problem causer, not solver.

Internally, however, each polling organization's results have been fairly stable. In Quinnipiac's poll, 40% approved of the proposed changes in the health care system in October; 38% do so today. In Pew's September question, 42% favored health care plans being discussed in Congress; in November, 38% did. In the GfKRoper/AP poll, 34% supported reform in September; 39% did so in November. In the ABC/Post poll, 46% supported it in September, 48% in November. In Gallup's polling, 38% said they wanted their member to vote for it in September, 35% said that in late November.

Against this stability, we have seen some significant changes in responses to questions about the role of government in the provision of health care. In three recent polls, skepticism has grown.

In a CBS News/New York Times question from March about whether the federal government should "guarantee health insurance for all Americans," 62% said it should. In September, 51% did. Fox News/Opinion Dynamics found that 66% in February said that the federal government should make sure all Americans have health care, while only 51% said so in July. And, finally, in a Gallup question from a year ago, 54% said it's the responsibility of the federal government to make sure all American have health care coverage. That's 47% now.

Why is opinion stable on reform plans, but dropping sharply on questions about government's role? The political atmosphere is more polarized now, and the stability of the responses on questions about reform may indicate that people made up their minds early based on party affiliation and haven't changed them. But other factors shape views about the government's role. For instance, the federal government is much more involved in the economy now than it was a year ago, and people may just more nervous about it. People tend to be more magnanimous about what they want government to do when they are feeling good about their own economic circumstances, and there is considerable economic pain right now. Another possible explanation is that people are tuning in more to the recent debate, and the more they hear about what government's role will be, the more reservations they have.

Finally, this shift in public opinion may reflect a larger ambivalence about government. We are pulled back and forth in our views about government depending on circumstances. We are a rich and powerful country and we want government to do a lot. We don't want to see our fellow citizens suffer because they don't have or can't get health care. But at the same time, we see government as wasteful, inefficient and too darn expensive. The weight of opinion today is on government as a problem causer, not solver. Our personal experiences in the past year as well as the government's expanded role have pulled us in a much more skeptical direction about Washington.

Karlyn Bowman is a senior fellow at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Karlyn
Bowman
  • Karlyn Bowman compiles and analyzes American public opinion using available polling data on a variety of subjects, including the economy, taxes, the state of workers in America, environment and global warming, attitudes about homosexuality and gay marriage, NAFTA and free trade, the war in Iraq, and women's attitudes. In addition, Ms. Bowman has studied and spoken about the evolution of American politics because of key demographic and geographic changes. She has often lectured on the role of think tanks in the United States and writes a weekly column for Forbes.com.
  • Phone: 2028625910
    Email: kbowman@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Andrew Rugg
    Phone: 2028625917
    Email: andrew.rugg@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image Swearing in the enemy
image Syria and American strategy
image Commencement speakers: Conservatives need not apply
image The literary profession and civic culture
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 20
    MON
  • 21
    TUE
  • 22
    WED
  • 23
    THU
  • 24
    FRI
Tuesday, May 21, 2013 | 5:00 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.
Free beer: Liberating libations from ‘Bootleggers and Baptists’

Join us for a discussion of the history and future of federal and state alcohol regulation and competition, followed by a reception with beer, wine, and spirits.

Wednesday, May 22, 2013 | 5:00 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.
NCLB sanctions: Tests taken, lessons learned

Join education scholars and practitioners for a discussion about the latest NCLB research and its implications for future education policy.

Thursday, May 23, 2013 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Competing visions of the common good: Rethinking help for the poor

What shared commitments do we have as citizens and neighbors to care for one another? How can a proper ordering of America’s political economy enable the most people to have the best life? At this event, Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA), a longtime champion of human rights causes, and AEI President Arthur Brooks will join Wallis in addressing these and other questions.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.