Could Obamacare win 'Lie of the Year' two times in a row?

Pinocchios by Shutterstock

Article Highlights

  • It is becoming increasingly clear that premiums are not dropping by $2500 per year per household

    Tweet This

  • CMS actuary: 65 percent of small businesses will see their health-insurance premiums increase

    Tweet This

  • ACA mandates that insurance policies meet new requirements — when you mandate stuff, prices go up

    Tweet This

In December, President Obama’s claim that “if you like your health care plan, you can keep it” was named the 2013 Lie of the Year by Politifact. This came shortly after even the barely accessible exchange websites made it clear that for many people, their old plans were no longer available due to the new regulatory environment imposed by Obamacare.

Now fast forward a few months to the glorious new year of 2014, and let’s see what has become of the president’s other central claim in the debate over health care reform: that it would “bring down premiums by $2,500 for the typical family.” (Here’s a compilation of the president making this claim over and over again before his law was enacted.)

Has that claim materialized now that the parts of the law the president decided not to delay for partisan political purposes are in full effect? Was it a reasonable claim to make at the time? Let’s have a look at the evidence.

The initial anecdotal evidence reported on for individuals signing up for new Obama-approved policies certainly did not suggest that premiums went down across the board, but that may just have been the result of a mix of stark disappointment for the few, and an unwarranted focus on the victimized as opposed to those reaping the benefits of reform.

Fortunately for our present purposes, as time goes by, more generally applicable numbers are surfacing. While it remains hard to paint a broadly representative picture of national premium, it is becoming increasingly clear that premiums are, indeed, not going down by $2500 per year per household. Just this past week, a report by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Office of the Actuary found that 65 percent of small businesses will see their health-insurance premiums increase due to a set of provisions implemented under the Affordable Care Act. Meanwhile, about 1 in 5 Americans who signed up for health plans through the exchanges appears to have found that they could not actually afford the premiums charged. Even Paul Krugman has now started writing columns arguing that premium hikes are limited, and if they are going up by a lot, then only for people he doesn’t view as sympathetic.

All this is not surprising, given that the ACA mandates that insurance policies meet a variety of new requirements—and when you mandate stuff, prices go up. But is it possible that the president and his fellow Democrats just didn’t know, and are only now learning about this from the news?

It seems unlikely. In November 2009, before the Affordable Care Act was enacted, Democratic Senator Evan Bayh from Indiana requested that the Congressional Budget Office look into this question. The CBO did precisely that, and found that premiums were likely to increase—the precise opposite of what the president had been promising. More precisely, the CBO predicted premium increases, by 2016, of 10 to 13 percent in the individual market, with negligible differences in the small- and large-group markets. In the nongroup market, that’s an increase of some $2,100 per family. I guess one could say that the president got the number almost right, just not the sign in front of it.

Now most people who buy health insurance are covered through large-group plans (you know, large groups are large so they add up quickly). One could therefore argue that the expectation, back in 2009, was that the typical family should expect to see similar premiums in once Obamacare was in full effect. But even that is an entirely different story from the one told so often by the president: that they could expect to see their premiums go down by $2,500.

When people started to receive cancellation notices in October, one line of defense the administration attempted to use was that only a small group of people—millions of people, but that’s nothing if you’re busy immanentizing the eschaton—was affected by the president’s claim that “if you like your plan, you can keep it.” That is certainly not the case here. The typical family is affected here, and with them tens of millions of Americans. That’s a lot of people, and that should make the claim that Obamacare would “bring down premiums by $2,500 for the typical family” a strong contender for 2014 Lie of the Year.

Stan Veuger is a resident scholar at AEI. His academic research focuses on political economy and applied microeconomics.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author



What's new on AEI

AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters
image A nation divided by marriage
image Teaching reform
image Socialist party pushing $20 minimum wage defends $13-an-hour job listing
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
Monday, October 27, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
State income taxes and the Supreme Court: Maryland Comptroller v. Wynne

Please join AEI for a panel discussion exploring these and other questions about this crucial case.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014 | 9:30 a.m. – 12:15 p.m.
For richer, for poorer: How family structures economic success in America

Join Lerman, Wilcox, and a group of distinguished scholars and commentators for the release of Lerman and Wilcox’s report, which examines the relationships among and policy implications of marriage, family structure, and economic success in America.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014 | 5:30 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.
The 7 deadly virtues: 18 conservative writers on why the virtuous life is funny as hell

Please join AEI for a book forum moderated by Last and featuring five of these leading conservative voices. By the time the forum is over, attendees may be on their way to discovering an entirely different — and better — moral universe.

Thursday, October 30, 2014 | 2:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
A nuclear deal with Iran? Weighing the possibilities

Join us, as experts discuss their predictions for whether the United States will strike a nuclear deal with Iran ahead of the November 24 deadline, and the repercussions of the possible outcomes.

Thursday, October 30, 2014 | 5:00 p.m. – 6:15 p.m.
The forgotten depression — 1921: The crash that cured itself

Please join Author James Grant and AEI senior economists for a discussion about Grant's book, "The Forgotten Depression: 1921: The Crash That Cured Itself" (Simon & Schuster, 2014).

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.