Malpractice in Massachusetts
Letter to the Editor

Ted Frank responds to a paper in the May/June 2008 issue of Health Affairs.

Resident Fellow
Ted Frank
Marc Rodwin and colleagues' highly publicized conclusion that Massachusetts does not have a malpractice insurance crisis is not supported by the data in their paper.

First, the sole finding supporting the conclusion, that malpractice insurance rates declined 1 percent from 1990 to 2005, is an artifact of the Simpson Paradox. Rates for low-risk doctors increased 14 percent; rates for high-risk doctors increased 45 percent. The mean decreased entirely because the mix of doctors changed, and the percentage of insured doctors with expensive high-risk policies declined substantially--a change consistent with the American Medical Association allegation that the malpractice crisis is causing doctors to leave high-risk professions such as obstetrics because of insurance costs.

Moreover, the claim that insurance rates declined from 1990 to 2005 comes from the improper mixture of inflation-adjusted policy rates with the nominal dollar value of insurance policy coverage. If nominal dollars were used for both values, one would see insurance costs rising; if inflation-adjusted numbers were used for both, one would see that the same dollars were buying less coverage.

Even if one accepted that rates had declined slightly between 1990 and 2005, this permits only the inference that the Massachusetts medical malpractice crisis in 2005 is no worse than it was in 1990, not that there is no crisis.

But the choice of 1990 as a reference point appears to be cherry-picking. If Rodwin and colleagues had chosen any other year in their data series as a reference point, one would see insurance costs increasing. A regression would show a long-term increase over time. And although the study measures insurance costs from 1975 to 2005, the authors make no reference to the major constant-dollar increase in insurance premiums during 1975–2005: the entire set of data from 1975–1990, when the litigation explosion happened, is largely ignored.

Ted Frank is a resident fellow at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Ted
Frank
  • Ted Frank is a former resident fellow at AEI. He specialized in product liability, class actions, and civil procedure while at AEI. Before joining AEI, Mr. Frank was a litigator from 1995 to 2005 and clerked for the Honorable Frank H. Easterbrook on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Mr. Frank has written for law reviews, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, and The American Spectator and has testified before Congress multiple times on legal issues. He writes for the award-winning legal blogs PointOfLaw.com and Overlawyered, and the Wall Street Journal has called him a "leading tort-reform advocate."  Mr. Frank was recently elected to membership in the American Law Institute.

What's new on AEI

To secure southern border, US must lead international effort to stabilize Central America
image The Ryan pro-work, anti-poverty plan: Thomas Aquinas 1, Ayn Rand 0
image Does SNAP support work? Yes and no
image Obama Democrats lose their big bet on health exchanges
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 28
    MON
  • 29
    TUE
  • 30
    WED
  • 31
    THU
  • 01
    FRI
Tuesday, July 29, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Is Medicare’s future secure? The 2014 Trustees Report

Please join AEI as the chief actuary for Medicare summarizes the report’s results, followed by a panel discussion of what those spending trends are likely to mean for seniors, taxpayers, the health industry, and federal policy.

Friday, August 01, 2014 | 10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Watergate revisited: The reforms and the reality, 40 years later

Please join us as four of Washington’s most distinguished political observers will revisit the Watergate hearings and discuss reforms that followed.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.