Obama's fiscal cliff stubbornness dangerous for military

U.S. Army (Flickr)

More than 1,600 paratroopers drop on Sicily Drop Zone during the 15th Annual Randy Oler Memorial Operation Toy Drop at Fort Bragg, N.C., Dec. 8, 2012.

Article Highlights

  • For nearly a year and a half, sequestration has been the law of the land. But few treated it that way. @MEaglen

    Tweet This

  • With less than 1 month to go before the deadline & no fiscal cliff deal in sight, the White House has changed its tune.

    Tweet This

  • The White House guidance to prepare for the fiscal cliff is the latest signal that the likelihood for a deal is fading.

    Tweet This

For nearly a year and a half, sequestration has been the law of the land. But few treated it that way, including the White House.

The Obama administration was supposedly so confident sequestration would never happen that the Department of Labor encouraged defense manufacturers to ignore another law leading up to the election … and sequestration with the WARN Act. This basically mandates 60 days' notice in advance of predictable mass layoffs for certain larger companies.

Then the Pentagon went so far as to offer and foot the bill for contractors if they followed the government's advice and subsequently were sued by their laid-off employees. While Pentagon leaders never had the authority to bind the hands of a future Congress's spending, leadership of these major companies took Obama's Cabinet at its word.

Finally, President Obama dismissed the prospect of sequestration during the final presidential debate, saying flat-out, "It will not happen."

Unfortunately and unsurprisingly, now with less than one month to go before the Jan. 2 deadline and no deal in sight, the White House has changed its tune. The Office of Management and the Budget has officially directed all federal agencies, including the military, to begin detailed sequestration planning.  

The problem now is two-fold: No amount of planning makes sequestration any more palatable to execute, and the very act of planning makes sequestration more acceptable and therefore more likely.

Pentagon Comptroller Robert Hale testified this fall before the House Armed Services Committee noting that no amount of planning and creativity could get around the fact that sequestration would leave the military a "less-capable, less-modern, less-ready force and [risk] creating a hollow military."

The White House guidance to prepare for the fiscal cliff is only the latest signal that the likelihood for a deal of any kind is fading. Despite their dire consequences for America's military, sequestration or partial sequestration appears inevitable.

Mackenzie Eaglen is a resident fellow in the Marilyn Ware Center for Security Studies.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Mackenzie
Eaglen

What's new on AEI

To secure southern border, US must lead international effort to stabilize Central America
image The Ryan pro-work, anti-poverty plan: Thomas Aquinas 1, Ayn Rand 0
image Does SNAP support work? Yes and no
image Obama Democrats lose their big bet on health exchanges
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 28
    MON
  • 29
    TUE
  • 30
    WED
  • 31
    THU
  • 01
    FRI
Tuesday, July 29, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Is Medicare’s future secure? The 2014 Trustees Report

Please join AEI as the chief actuary for Medicare summarizes the report’s results, followed by a panel discussion of what those spending trends are likely to mean for seniors, taxpayers, the health industry, and federal policy.

Friday, August 01, 2014 | 10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Watergate revisited: The reforms and the reality, 40 years later

Please join us as four of Washington’s most distinguished political observers will revisit the Watergate hearings and discuss reforms that followed.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.