A spending review inspired by subsidiarity

Article Highlights

  • The Italian state was weakened by its regulatory function.

    Tweet This

  • Focus should be on the state as the source and manufacturer of regulation- and the controller of its proper application.

    Tweet This

  • The paradigm of subsidiarity is the belief that the state should encourage the action of intermediate bodies.

    Tweet This

We hope that the spending review will become an opportunity to address the various aspects of public spending. In particular, this is an opportunity to provide a practical examination of the principle of subsidiarity in horizontal variation.

To this end, a spending review process should aim to respond to the needs of our long-term debt (while also enabling economic growth) and must be part of a renewed debate on the revision of both federal and subsidiary public administration. We favor, in this regard, the creation of true "local integrated systems" able to seek efficiencies and cost effectiveness of administrative action at the local level, while also boosting the effectiveness of such action to the benefit of local communities.

The premise of our analysis is the finding that the Italian State, in fact, was made weak because of its regulatory function. This is a weakness that makes the State prey to and hostage of special and corporate interests. In this sense, the State, by reexamining its vocation as a regulator and arbiter (Ordnungspolitik), would become characterized as more than an agent of expenditure: a subject capable of facilitating growth by ensuring the smooth operation of an institutional framework within which to individuals and intermediary bodies are empowered to freely express (Soziale Marktwirtschaft).

The overcoming of such weaknesses begins by looking past the role of the state as a provider of public services; instead, focus should be placed on examining the state as the source and manufacturer of regulation-and the controller of its proper application. Under such a scenario of renewed authority, the state regulator becomes able to pursue action by drawing inspiration from the principles of subsidiarity and polyarchy.

The paradigm of subsidiarity, in the relationship between public authorities and civil society, is the belief that the state should encourage the action of intermediate bodies, trying to remedy oppressive bureaucracy and the proliferation of rules that suppress the spirit of individual initiative.

To achieve these ambitious goals, one might start with a reform of local government that includes overcoming the organizational structure through the creation of supra-administrative entities, which, placed in service of more local political entities, are able to perform all administrative functions now performed by the individual municipalities in addition to those previously undertaken by the provinces.

In such an organizational model, municipalities, removed from their expensive bureaucratic apparatus, retain only the tasks of administration, performance monitoring and regulation. As a result, the performance of administrative duties and / or the provision of local public services would shift focus: the task would be to "buy" performance - based on standard rates - directly from the new administrative-municipal entities , or, if more convenient, through the market or third sector.

In this way it may become possible to start a reform process that can change the framework of local public authorities and, at the same time, induce a structural reform of public spending by ensuring the full application of the principle of horizontal subsidiarity in a world that is stratified.

Flavio Felice is president of the Acton-Tocqueville Research Center and Adjunct Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington DC

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine

What's new on AEI

Expanding opportunity in America
image Moving beyond fear: Addressing the threat of the Islamic state in Iraq and Syria
image Foreign policy is not a 'CSI' episode
image The Air Force’s vital role
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
Monday, July 21, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Closing the gaps in health outcomes: Alternative paths forward

Please join us for a broader exploration of targeted interventions that provide real promise for reducing health disparities, limiting or delaying the onset of chronic health conditions, and improving the performance of the US health care system.

Monday, July 21, 2014 | 4:00 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.
Comprehending comprehensive universities

Join us for a panel discussion that seeks to comprehend the comprehensives and to determine the role these schools play in the nation’s college completion agenda.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014 | 8:50 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Who governs the Internet? A conversation on securing the multistakeholder process

Please join AEI’s Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy for a conference to address key steps we can take, as members of the global community, to maintain a free Internet.

Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Expanding opportunity in America: A conversation with House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan

Please join us as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) unveils a new set of policy reforms aimed at reducing poverty and increasing upward mobility throughout America.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 6:00 p.m. – 7:15 p.m.
Is it time to end the Export-Import Bank?

We welcome you to join us at AEI as POLITICO’s Ben White moderates a lively debate between Tim Carney, one of the bank’s fiercest critics, and Tony Fratto, one of the agency’s staunchest defenders.

Event Registration is Closed
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.