The Unintended Consequences of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act

  • Title:

    The Unintended Consequences of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act
  • Format:

    Paperback
  • Paperback Price:

    15.00
  • Paperback ISBN:

    978-0-8447-4257-1
  • Paperback Dimensions:

    6'' x 9''
  • 76 Paperback pages
  • Buy the Book

Click here to view the full text as an Adobe PDF.

Click here to view the press release for The Unintended Consequences of Section 5

Born from bloodshed in March 1965, when six hundred black protestors marching for the right to vote in Selma, Alabama, were set upon by state troopers wielding clubs and tear gas, the Voting Rights Act was, as President Lyndon B. Johnson declared at the time, “a triumph for freedom as huge as any victory that has ever been won on any battlefield.” Unfortunately, in the four decades since its passage, amendments and legal developments have made this once simple law muddled and contradictory, far removed from its original purpose of ending voting barriers for millions of African Americans.

In The Unintended Consequences of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, Edward Blum draws on public records, press accounts, and extensive personal interviews with state and local officials and others involved in politics at the grassroots level to highlight the real-world consequences of Section 5. Anecdotal accounts of the difficulties local governments in four jurisdictions have encountered in implementing the act reveal the transformation of the act from a law designed to protect individuals’ right to vote to a gerrymandering tool used to further the electoral prospects of incumbent politicians of all races. Blum concludes that Section 5, as it has been implemented, has become not only silly and expensive, but pernicious as well.

Why did Congress renew Section 5 in 2006, and why did President George W. Bush enthusiastically sign it into law? Blum offers an unsettling perspective on Lyndon Johnson’s proudest legislative achievement, describing its degeneration into an unworkable, unfair, and arguably unconstitutional mandate which is bad for the body politic and race relations in America.

Edward Blum is a visiting fellow at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Edward
Blum

What's new on AEI

To secure southern border, US must lead international effort to stabilize Central America
image The Ryan pro-work, anti-poverty plan: Thomas Aquinas 1, Ayn Rand 0
image Does SNAP support work? Yes and no
image Obama Democrats lose their big bet on health exchanges
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 28
    MON
  • 29
    TUE
  • 30
    WED
  • 31
    THU
  • 01
    FRI
Tuesday, July 29, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Is Medicare’s future secure? The 2014 Trustees Report

Please join AEI as the chief actuary for Medicare summarizes the report’s results, followed by a panel discussion of what those spending trends are likely to mean for seniors, taxpayers, the health industry, and federal policy.

Friday, August 01, 2014 | 10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Watergate revisited: The reforms and the reality, 40 years later

Please join us as four of Washington’s most distinguished political observers will revisit the Watergate hearings and discuss reforms that followed.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.