Americans Today Would Prefer Tax Stability

For most Americans, the terms of the tax debate have changed. A careful reading of poll data shows that most people want tax stability, not tax relief.

Let's start with the unsurprising fact that few Americans are paying attention to the details of this debate: Is it $350 billion? $550 billion? $750 billion? For most, the numbers are a blur. Ending double taxation on dividends? Capital gains rate reductions? Most people don't have a clue. In the late-April/early-May Pew poll, just 19 percent knew a great deal about the kinds of taxes Bush has proposed cutting. Furthermore, Americans don't trust politicians when they say they will cut taxes. Polls over the past 30 years show that these promises--whether made by Republicans or Democrats--have little credibility. In 1969, in a Harris question, 86 percent agreed that politicians violate tax promises. Early in Ronald Reagan's presidency, two-thirds of those polled by CBS News said it was beyond any president's control to cut taxes to a real extent. In January 1989, long before George H.W. Bush broke his "no new taxes" pledge, 71 percent told NBC and Wall Street Journal pollsters he wouldn't be able to keep it. Polls showed that when President Bill Clinton promised targeted tax relief, hardly anyone thought he was talking about them.

Not only are most people skeptical about promises to cut taxes, but they also rarely feel they get relief. Polls conducted after passage of Reagan's 1981 tax cut showed only small numbers felt their taxes went down. After passage of the sweeping 1986 bipartisan tax reform legislation, even people in the polls' lowest income category--many of whom had been taken off the rolls - said their taxes went up. In the new Pew poll, just 38 percent of the supporters of Bush's tax plan said their taxes would go down significantly (23 percent of the national sample thought they would).

The tax revolt of the late 1970s had gale force in part because the economy was in terrible shape. Inflation was pushing taxpayers into higher brackets, resulting in real tax hikes without gains in real incomes. Indexation and low inflation eased that situation, explaining why income tax discontent, as measured by Gallup, isn't rising. But the tax revolt also coincided with a change in the country's beliefs about government. After a long period when Americans equated federal government activity with progress, attitudes toward Washington turned sharply negative in the mid-1960s. Except for brief periods in the mid-1980s and around Sept. 11, 2001, they haven't improved.

Core Republican voters aren't satisfied with the status quo about government's size or scope, and they push for and vote for tax cuts to reduce government's role at every opportunity. But some voters aren't as troubled by the size of government. Still others are more or less inured to the size of the federal government or feel powerless to do much about it. Many people today are more upset about how the federal government spends their tax dollars than about what they pay.

Today, people don't believe their federal taxes will be cut, and they certainly don't want them raised. Stability becomes their goal. Americans' current thinking about taxes explains some of the puzzles in current polls on the subject. Although most Americans aren't beating the drums for a tax cut, more people approve than disapprove of the job the president is doing on taxes. When tax-cut questions are asked in a straightforward manner, people support cuts. But when they are reminded of things they want from Washington, tax cuts take a back seat.

Today's polls show that neither party has an advantage when pollsters ask which party would do a better job on taxes. In a late-April ABC News and Washington Post poll, 46 percent preferred Republicans and 49 percent Democrats. In the early-May Fox News and Opinion Dynamics poll, 36 percent generally agreed with Democrats on taxes, 42 percent with Republicans. Although the questions aren't asked as often, the GOP has a substantial advantage on "keeping taxes down" or "holding the line" on them (54 percent to 29 percent edge in a Battleground poll). When most Americans (60 percent or more in nine Gallup polls since 1959) expect their federal taxes to go up in the next year, the appeal of "holding the line" becomes clearer.

In the states, where people think politicians are closer to them and more accountable, tax sentiment looks quite different and a new revolt may be brewing. Nationally, the question is whether a committed tax cutter like Bush can get the public to the tax stability they crave.

Karlyn H. Bowman is a resident fellow at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author


  • Karlyn Bowman compiles and analyzes American public opinion using available polling data on a variety of subjects, including the economy, taxes, the state of workers in America, environment and global warming, attitudes about homosexuality and gay marriage, NAFTA and free trade, the war in Iraq, and women's attitudes. In addition, Ms. Bowman has studied and spoken about the evolution of American politics because of key demographic and geographic changes. She has often lectured on the role of think tanks in the United States and writes a weekly column for
  • Phone: 2028625910
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Andrew Rugg
    Phone: 2028625917

What's new on AEI

image The money in banking: Comparing salaries of bank and bank regulatory employees
image What Obama should say about China in Japan
image A key to college success: Involved dads
image China takes the fight to space
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.