The Politics of the Flu, an Rx for the FDA, and Judging Jury Duty

When the United States lost about half of its supply of flu vaccines late last year due to production problems at a lab in the United Kingdom, observers wondered whether there would be any significant impact on politics. If there has been any, it's been modest--but the vaccine shortage has changed behavior, according to recent public-opinion polls.

When Harris Interactive and the Wall Street Journal Online asked in mid-December 2004 whether respondents had gotten a vaccination this flu season, about half as many people said they had compared with the past two years--17 percent versus 35 percent.

When asked who was most at fault for the shortage, 37 percent said the manufacturer was, compared with 16 percent who blamed the Department of Health and Human Services, 10 percent who said the Food and Drug Administration and 6 percent who said the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

When asked about their willingness to use a flu vaccine made in Germany but not approved by the FDA, 36 percent said they would feel safe receiving it, 36 percent said they would not, and 27 percent weren't sure.

FDA Fears. On another high-profile health issue, a mid-December 2004 Ipsos Public Affairs/AP poll showed 83 percent of respondents said they were very or somewhat confident in the safety of prescription drugs sold in the United States.

In addition, 76 percent expressed confidence in the FDA to ensure the safety of drugs sold here. Of those who had taken a drug prescribed by their doctor in the past year (74 percent), 10 percent said they had used Vioxx, 11 percent Celebrex and 5 percent Bextra. All three drugs are widely used but are now suspected of having serious side effects.

A Trial By My Peers. In a Harris Interactive poll conducted for the American Bar Association, 84 percent of respondents said that jury duty was an important civic duty that should be fulfilled even if it is inconvenient. In a separate question, only 17 percent agreed that jury duty was a burden to be avoided.

The July 2004 poll found that 62 percent of respondents had been called for jury duty, while 38 percent had not. Of those who had been called to serve, 45 percent of those who were called said jury duty was what they expected it to be, while 22 percent said it was better and 10 percent said it was worse.

When asked if they would want a jury trial for themselves rather than a trial by a judge, 51 percent in the poll strongly agreed and 24 agreed somewhat.

Priorities for the President and Congress. When Gallup, CNN and USA Today asked people which of 18 issues were most important for the president and Congress to address, Iraq topped the list (51 percent described it as extremely important), followed by terrorism (49 percent), education (44 percent), health care costs (42 percent) and the economy and Social Security (40 percent each).

At the bottom of the list, less than a quarter described as extremely important the environment, limits on lawsuits, abortion, laws to help blacks and other minorities, and same sex marriages or civil unions.

Going to Hell in a Handbasket. In 1964, when the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago asked people about the state of morals in the country, 41 percent said they were pretty bad and getting worse.

When NBC News and the Wall Street Journal asked the question in December 2004, a virtually identical 43 percent gave the same response. In 1964, 16 percent put themselves at the other end of the spectrum, saying that morals were pretty good and getting better. In the new poll, 12 percent gave that response.

In both years, roughly 20 percent said that morals were pretty good but getting worse. In 1964, 14 percent said they were pretty bad and getting worse, compared with 20 percent who felt that way in 2004.

Consumer Confidence: Partisan Chasms. A poll by ABC News and Money magazine found an unusual degree of polarization on consumer confidence in 2004. The index--whose three components measure views of the national economy, people's personal finances and the buying climate--stood at +33 among Republicans in late December and -37 among Democrats, for a 70-point gap. The average gap across the previous decade was 21 points.

Big Government, Big Threat. In December 2004, 57 percent told Gallup that big government posed the biggest threat to the future of the country, followed by big business (27 percent) and big labor (11 percent). Interestingly, there were no differences among Democrats, Republicans and independents about the threat posed by big government.

But in the NEP national Election Day exit poll, two-thirds of Bush supporters said government was doing too many things better left to individuals and businesses. Roughly the same proportion of Democrats thought government should do more to solve the country's problems.

The Moore Effect. John Zogby made a notable observation about Michael Moore's controversial documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11" in a post-election release. When Zogby International asked people in surveys whether they connected more with Moore's film or Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ," all but the youngest voters selected the latter.

Zogby said he was surprised by the "decidedly negative" reaction to "Fahrenheit 9/11": "Many saw ["Fahrenheit 9/11"] as an attack on not just Bush, but on themselves and their values."

Karlyn H. Bowman is a resident fellow specializing in public opinion and polls at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Karlyn
Bowman
  • Karlyn Bowman compiles and analyzes American public opinion using available polling data on a variety of subjects, including the economy, taxes, the state of workers in America, environment and global warming, attitudes about homosexuality and gay marriage, NAFTA and free trade, the war in Iraq, and women's attitudes. In addition, Ms. Bowman has studied and spoken about the evolution of American politics because of key demographic and geographic changes. She has often lectured on the role of think tanks in the United States and writes a weekly column for Forbes.com.
  • Phone: 2028625910
    Email: kbowman@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Andrew Rugg
    Phone: 2028625917
    Email: andrew.rugg@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image How to stop Assad's slaughter
image FHA Watch, May 2013 (Vol. 2, No. 5)
image Apple becomes latest target of the Beltway shakedown
image Lack of adult supervision in the Obama administration
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 20
    MON
  • 21
    TUE
  • 22
    WED
  • 23
    THU
  • 24
    FRI
Tuesday, May 21, 2013 | 5:00 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.
Free beer: Liberating libations from ‘Bootleggers and Baptists’

Join us for a discussion of the history and future of federal and state alcohol regulation and competition, followed by a reception with beer, wine, and spirits.

Wednesday, May 22, 2013 | 5:00 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.
NCLB sanctions: Tests taken, lessons learned

Join education scholars and practitioners for a discussion about the latest NCLB research and its implications for future education policy.

Thursday, May 23, 2013 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Competing visions of the common good: Rethinking help for the poor

What shared commitments do we have as citizens and neighbors to care for one another? How can a proper ordering of America’s political economy enable the most people to have the best life? At this event, Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA), a longtime champion of human rights causes, and AEI President Arthur Brooks will join Wallis in addressing these and other questions.

Event Registration is Closed
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.