Saving Medicare

Download file This document is available here as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

A version of this article appeared on Forbes.com on May 9, 2008.

May 2008

In this article, Joseph Antos and Mark V. Pauly warn about the impending financial crisis in Medicare and suggest a market-based solution to the problem--phasing in a sustainable credit system for Medicare recipients that allows them to choose their own health care plans. This arrangement would not only cut down on spending, but would also allow consumers to select from a variety of products and provide them far greater choice than they currently have.

Medicare is in perilous financial shape. The number of seniors receiving benefits will double over the next two decades as baby boomers head to retirement, and each new beneficiary will spend substantially more health care dollars, on average, than today's seniors. Unless we can get costs under control, Medicare will need an additional $36 trillion to stay in business over the next seventy-five years.

Even if competition does not produce dramatic improvements in market efficiency, it has a more basic advantage: markets offer a variety of products and give consumers far greater choice than government bureaucracies.

How can we avoid this looming crisis in Medicare's financing? Five years ago, Congress adopted a "trigger" mechanism to force action should Medicare's financial performance begin to falter. In early February, the trigger was tripped, requiring President George W. Bush to submit a plan to Congress to control costs. Congress, however, did not oblige itself to actually pass legislation--and seems decidedly uninterested in the president's suggestions.

Its reticence is understandable. Medicare is very popular. Seniors know they are getting a bargain, since subsidies pay 85 percent of the cost of their health care under the program. Younger people are footing the bill, and with three workers paying into the program for every person receiving benefits, the tax burden has been kept fairly low--so far.

That is about to change with a vengeance. Retiring boomers will outnumber new workers entering the labor market as early as 2012. By itself, this demographic shift is not a big problem. But technological advances in health care are extending life and making those extra years more worthwhile--good news that, unfortunately, comes at a price of rapidly rising spending per beneficiary, a price we might not be able to afford. If progress continues at its present pace, Medicare's burden on taxpayers will become increasingly unsustainable, both politically and economically.

Other countries have dealt with this problem by capping health care spending and rationing the demand for care through bureaucratic rules based on political value judgments. For example, Canada makes people with hip pain wait months for their operations.

There is a better way. We could restrict the growth of public spending per beneficiary, replacing Medicare's open-ended entitlement with a credit that grows at a rate that is financially sustainable. Seniors could use the credit to help pay for health plans of their own choosing and add their own money to buy more expensive plans. Plans that are fairly low cost would necessitate tighter rationing of new health services. Other plans might offer greater access to new services and providers for higher and more rapidly rising premiums. Competitive markets would help people deal as well as they could with limits on public resources.

Such competitive plans might well be more innovative than traditional Medicare in putting a package of services into a limited budget. Even if competition does not produce dramatic improvements in market efficiency, it has a more basic advantage: markets offer a variety of products and give consumers far greater choice than government bureaucracies. In a resource-constrained program, a market arrangement would allow people to choose among plans with different approaches to cost (and technology) growth, and to select the one that copes with costly but beneficial new technology in the way they most prefer.

A market arrangement would also address the problem of the "intergenerational contract"--effectively a pledge, advocates argue, from younger generations to guarantee seniors' health benefits without limit. Yet young workers are never given the choice whether to sign this pledge. The older generation made a generous promise to itself--then imposed the cost of keeping it on its children and grandchildren.

A market-based credit offers a compromise that could stave off the inevitable intergenerational strife when the "contract" can no longer be fulfilled. It would promise people nearing age sixty-five that they could continue to receive today's medical package, measured in terms of real purchasing power, but it would not guarantee more money to pay for whatever costly new technology might be introduced over time.

This sustainable credit system could be phased in, exempting current beneficiaries and those nearing age sixty-five from the limits on public spending. Younger workers would receive the credit once they became eligible for Medicare. They could supplement the credit to pay for more new technology, or they could join a health plan that adjusts its benefits over time so as to remain within the credit's budget. Poor and near-poor beneficiaries might be exempted from the spending growth limits, depending on what the social cost of curtailing their access to new technology turns out to be.

A system of sustainable credits would limit the runaway growth of Medicare spending. Compared with today's Medicare options, this limit will not make people happy. But today's generous options cannot be preserved without imposing intolerable costs on future generations. We can accept uniformly imposed, politically chosen, and bureaucratically enforced cuts in benefits--or we can give seniors the power to make the best of a difficult situation.

Joseph Antos is the Wilson H. Taylor Scholar in Health Care and Retirement Policy at AEI. Mark V. Pauly is the Bendheim Professor at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. He is the author of Markets Without Magic: How Competition Might Save Medicare (AEI Press, May 2008).

Download file This document is available here as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Joseph
Antos
  • Joseph Antos is the Wilson H. Taylor Scholar in Health Care and Retirement Policy at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where his research focuses on the economics of health policy — including the Affordable Care Act, Medicare, the uninsured, and the overall reform of the health care system and its financing. He also studies the impact of health care expenditures on federal budget policy.

    Before joining AEI, Antos was assistant director for health and human resources at the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). He has also held senior positions in the US Department of Health and Human Services, the Office of Management and Budget, and the President’s Council of Economic Advisers. He recently completed a seven-year term as health adviser to CBO, and two terms as a commissioner of the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission. In 2013, he was also named adjunct associate professor of emergency medicine at George Washington University.

    Antos has a Ph.D. and an M.A. in economics from the University of Rochester and a B.A. in mathematics from Cornell University.



    Follow Joseph Antos on Twitter.

  • Phone: 202-862-5938
    Email: jantos@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Neil McCray
    Phone: 2028625826
    Email: Neil.McCray@aei.org

 

Mark V.
Pauly

  • Mark V. Pauly is the Bendheim Professor in the Department of Health Care Management;  professor of health care management, insurance and risk management, and business and public policy at the Wharton School; codirector of the Roy and Diana Vagelos Life Sciences and Management Program; and professor of economics in the School of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania. A former commissioner on the Physician Payment Review Commission, Mr. Pauly has served on the advisory committee to the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality and on the Medicare Technical Advisory Panel. He currently serves on the National Advisory Council for the National Institutes of Health National Center for Research Resources, the National Academy of Sciences' Committee to Study the Veterinary Workforce, and its Committee on the Biomedical Workforce. He has been a consultant to the Congressional Budget Office, the Office of the Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (which supported some of his work on individual health insurance), and health trade associations. Mr. Pauly is a coeditor-in-chief of the International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics and an associate editor of the Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.  


  • Phone: 2158986861
    Email: pauly@wharton.upenn.edu

What's new on AEI

image The Census Bureau and Obamacare: Dumb decision? Yes. Conspiracy? No.
image A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
image Give the CBO long-range tools
image The coming collapse of India's communists
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.