Matt Drudge, E-Journalist

Last Friday at 7:58 p.m., Matt Drudge, the notorious Internet journalist who told the world about the liaison between Monica Lewinsky and President Clinton, sent an e-mail to hundreds of thousands of people on his electronic mailing list.

"The Drudge Report," it read, "is monitoring information on what appears to be an 8.4 magnitude seismic event that occurred in the BALTICS-BELARUS region in NW RUSSIA." Was the story true? An 8.4 quake would be greater by far than Loma Prieta in 1989, Kobe in 1995 or even San Francisco in 1906.

Yesterday, Drudge's website was reporting that "one military source has become convinced that the reading was a technical error." We called Robert North at the International Data Center, Drudge's source, who said that his "automatic processing isn't perfect. . . . That earthquake never happened."

This rumbling is what the new E-Journalism is all about. Drudge, who may be the most powerful reporter in America and is certainly the most heroic, hears something, sees something, monitors something. Drawing on his own instincts to assess the item's veracity, he tells his readers, and they can check it out themselves (Drudge provided a handy link to the IDC's website)--or swallow it whole.

In other words, E-Journalism demands judgment not just from writers but from readers. Better yet, it reminds us that all journalism demands such judgment. We may feel better about a story because it has a brand name like AP or CBS attached, but skepticism is always warranted.

When I saw Sunday that corporate twins Time and CNN were reporting that the United States "used lethal nerve gas during a mission to kill American defectors in Laos during the Vietnam War," I wondered: How good were the sources? Where was the chemical evidence? Was reporter Peter Arnett himself credible? Were CNN and Time stretching this tale to create a blockbuster premiere for their new TV show?

Then again, readers of this column can question my own skepticism. Wasn't Glassman the host of a Sunday chat show that CNN killed last January? Does he harbor a grudge?

Such questions are legitimate and necessary--and I credit Drudge with reminding us they must be asked. The conventional editing process is no guarantor of truth, as Drudge pointed out in his virtuoso performance Tuesday before a snarling audience at the National Press Club.

He noted that NBC's legions didn't prevent Tom Brokaw from smearing Richard Jewell, that the Wall Street Journal recently suffered a huge libel judgment and that fictionist Stephen Glass deceived, among many others, John F. Kennedy Jr. and the editors of the New Republic.

By contrast, Drudge said, a journalist operating alone takes personal responsibility for his stories in a way that large news organizations do not. "No 'Periscope' here," he said. "No 'Washington Whispers' here. I put my name on it. I'll answer for anything I write."

Also, with Internet reporters such as Drudge around, stories are less likely to be hoarded by journalism's elite, who use the "public's right to know" as a constant defense but who really mean "our right to tell the public when we feel like it." Newsweek put the Lewinsky story on ice--an unsound judgment. Drudge let the world know.

Drudge had no apologies for non-membership in journalism's smug little guild. "If I am here to defend what I am writing," he said, "why isn't that enough?" It is. Let Drudge write his version of truth, and let readers judge for themselves. If he libels someone (as Sidney Blumenthal, the smirkish Clinton aide, alleges), then he'll be sued, as he should be. If he gets the story wrong too many times, no one will listen to him. The marketplace for news is like any other.

But this kind of marketplace, spread by the Internet, is a threat to the people with the power today, especially in politics and journalism. Drudge quoted Hillary Clinton, who said earlier this year, "We're all going to have to rethink how we deal with the Internet. As exciting as these new developments are, there are a number of serious issues without any kind of editing function or gatekeeping function."

She talked about a kind of balance, warning that "any time an individual leaps so far ahead of that balance and throws the system, whatever it might be--political, economic, technological--out of balance, you've got a problem."

Really? Maybe you've got a problem, "you" being the folks in charge before someone leaps "far ahead." The rest of us, gatekeeper-less, have more choices, more freedom, a more exciting future.

Drudge wondered if Mrs. Clinton would have said the same thing about such balance-upsetters as Edison and Ford. "If technology has finally caught up with individual liberty," said Drudge, "why would anyone who loves freedom want to rethink that?"

Exactly. If there is a problem with Drudge, it is that there is only one of him. Let a thousand Drudges bloom, and let readers make up their own minds.

As for that earthquake. Okay, so it didn't happen in Belarus, but it's happening in America today--to the dismay of the National Press Club and Hillary Clinton--and the reading is at least 8.4.

James K. Glassman is a resident fellow at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

James K.
Glassman
  • James K. Glassman is a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where he works on Internet and communications policy in the new AEI Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy.

    A scholar, diplomat, and journalist, Glassman rejoins AEI after having served as under secretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs, during which time he led America’s public diplomacy outreach and inaugurated the use of new Internet technology in these efforts, an approach he christened “public diplomacy 2.0.” He was also chairman of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, the independent federal agency that oversees all US government nonmilitary international broadcasting. Most recently, Glassman was instrumental in the creation of the George W. Bush Institute, where he remains the founding executive director.

    Before his government service, Glassman was a senior fellow at AEI, where he specialized in economics and technology and founded The American, AEI’s magazine, which he led as editor-in-chief until his departure from AEI in 2007.

    In addition to his government service, Glassman was a former president of The Atlantic, publisher of The New Republic, executive vice president of US News & World Report, and editor-in-chief and co-owner of Roll Call. As a columnist for The Washington Post, Glassman wrote about political and economic issues. He was also the host of CNN’s “Capital Gang Sunday” and of PBS’s “TechnoPolitics.” In 2000, he cofounded TCS, a technology and policy website. His most recent book is “The Secret Code of the Superior Investor” (Crown Forum).


    Glassman has a B.A. in government from Harvard College where he was a managing editor of The Crimson.


     

  • Email: [email protected]

What's new on AEI

Rebuilding American defense: A speech by Governor Bobby Jindal
image Smelling liberal, thinking conservative
image Stopping Ebola before it turns into a pandemic
image All too many reasons for pessimism about Europe
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 20
    MON
  • 21
    TUE
  • 22
    WED
  • 23
    THU
  • 24
    FRI
Monday, October 20, 2014 | 2:00 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Warfare beneath the waves: The undersea domain in Asia

We welcome you to join us for a panel discussion of the undersea military competition occurring in Asia and what it means for the United States and its allies.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014 | 8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters

AEI’s Election Watch is back! Please join us for two sessions of the longest-running election program in Washington, DC. 

Wednesday, October 22, 2014 | 1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.
What now for the Common Core?

We welcome you to join us at AEI for a discussion of what’s next for the Common Core.

Thursday, October 23, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.
Brazil’s presidential election: Real challenges, real choices

Please join AEI for a discussion examining each candidate’s platform and prospects for victory and the impact that a possible shift toward free-market policies in Brazil might have on South America as a whole.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.