William C. Greenwalt

Share Mark as favorite

Defense.gov (Flickr)

Acquisition reform is necessary to maintain the Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) current technological and military supremacy over potential rivals in the coming decades .

Share Mark as favorite

Only an effective acquisition system can deliver that dominance and only Congress can provide DOD with the tools and incentives to ensure our men and women have the right capabilities when it counts.

Share Mark as favorite

In the current budgetary environment, there is nothing more critical to national security than getting acquisition right.  If we get it wrong, we will end up with a hollow, unready force with old outdated equipment unable to meet the threats of the present or the future, let alone the past.  

Share Mark as favorite

marines_island_seizure_excercise_military_spending_defense_flickr

In part two, we dive a little deeper into Better Buying Power’s bullet points.

Share Mark as favorite

harpoon_missile_cruiser_pacific_ocean_airforce_navy_marines_defense_flickr

With Friday’s “interim release” of the Department of Defense’s next phase of acquisition reform, Better Buying Power 3.0, we turn to PSF contributor William Greenwalt for some initial thoughts.

Share Mark as favorite

Visiting Fellow Bill Greenwalt discussed the defense acquisition reform on Federal News Radio 1500 AM’s ‘In Depth.’

Share Mark as favorite

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel speaks to Marines stationed at Camp Pendleton, in San Diego, Calif., Aug. 12, 2014.

A globally integrated commercial-defense industrial base should provide the U.S. with maximum innovation at minimum cost. Politically, this has been and will continue to be a difficult and challenging objective to achieve.

Share Mark as favorite

air_craft_carrier_air_force_jet_acquisition_defense_flickr

In November 2013, the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) embarked on an effort to reform what is universally recognized as a broken acquisition system within the Department of Defense.

Share Mark as favorite

Regulatory and oversight stovepipes often lead to excessive bureaucratic inefficiencies within government and a compliance mentality, poor performance and lack of innovation in the regulated industry.  

Share Mark as favorite

obamacare_website_government_aqcuisition_failure_shutterstock

Still, the need to circumvent the acquisition system–as the godfathers of HealthCare.gov did–is becoming increasingly essential if agencies want something innovative, fast, cheap or functional. 

Open
Refine Content