|
|
| Dimensions: 6.25'' x 9.25'' |
 |
| 180 pages |
 |
|
AEI Press
(Washington)
|
 |
| Publication Date: January 2001 |
 |
 |
| Paperback |
| ISBN: 0844741493 |
| Price: $ 17.00 |
Add to Cart  |
 |
| Hardcover |
| ISBN: 0844741485 |
| Price: $ 35.00 |
Add to Cart  |
 |
| Examination Copies |
|
|
 |
 |
View the summary, press release, and key points.
In Rethinking WIC, Douglas J. Besharov and Peter Germanis analyze the research on the effectiveness of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. Their assessment challenges the conventional wisdom that WIC is a uniquely successful program and demonstrates that many claims about WIC's effectiveness are misleading exaggerations. Besharov and Germanis do not argue that WIC should be abandoned, but that policymakers should undertake a sustained effort to make the program more effective.
|
Key Findings about WIC
- Makes at least a small improvement in the diets and behaviors of some pregnant women, especially the most disadvantaged, which may lead to some better birth outcomes
- Increases the nutritional intake of some infants, especially those who would not have been breastfed, but may also reduce breastfeeding, which could have negative health consequences
- Makes little significant differences in the diets for most one- to four-year-old children may help some children whose intake of nutrients might otherwise be inadequate
- Is largely irrelevant to the most serious nutritional problem facing disadvantaged Americans: overweight
Six Programmatic Reforms
- Target benefits to more needful families, the group that seems to benefit most from WIC
- Give state and local WIC agencies the flexibility to intensify the basic food package and nutritional counseling
- Add a focus on preventing overweight, perhaps the most serious problem facing low-income children and parents
- Serve children over age four, especially because of the growing problem of overweight
- Increase directive counseling, because many contemporary nutritional problems are caused by unhealthy behaviors rather than by lack of food
- Try alternative service providers, such as health care providers, that offer integrated services
Four Research Priorities
- The children's program, about which little reliable research exists
- Expanded services at the "policy margin" for pregnant women, infants, and older children
- More aggressive interventions to improve unhealthy diets
- Alternative health-related service providers that take a more comprehensive approach to health and nutrition
[more...] |
Douglas J. Besharov is the Joseph J. and Violet Jacobs Scholar in Social Welfare Studies at AEI and a professor at the University of Maryland's School of Public Affairs. Peter Germanis is a research associate at AEI and assistant director of the University of Maryland's Welfare Reform Academy.

Table of Contents

Foreword
Part I: Rethinking WIC
- Introduction
- Program Benefits
- Program Coverage
- Previous Research
- Research Weaknesses
- Does WIC "Work"?
- Programmatic Flexibility
- Rigorous Evaluation
- Conclusion
Appendix: Attempting to Correct for Selection Bias
Part II: Commentaries
- Addressing the Selection-Bias Problem for Program Targeting and Design
- An Incremental Approach to Testing WIC's Efficacy
- A Defense of the Existing Research on WIC
- Enhancing WIC's Effectiveness
Notes
References
Index
About the Authors and the Contributors
View Book Summary