About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all books by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Title

BOOKS
About the AEI Press
Orders and Shipping
Book Reviews
Press Releases

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Books >  Who Really Cares
Who Really Cares
Print Mail
The Surprising Truth about Compassionate Conservatism
By Arthur C. Brooks
Posted: Monday, November 27, 2006
Who Really Cares
272 pages
Basic Books  (New York)
Publication Date: November 2006
Hardcover
ISBN: 978-0465008216

Click here to purchase this book on Amazon.

We all know we should give to charity, but who really does? Approximately three-quarters of Americans give their time and money to various charities, churches, and causes; the other quarter of the population does not. Why has America split into two nations: givers and non-givers? Arthur C. Brooks, a top scholar of economics and public policy, has spent years researching this trend, and even he was surprised by what he found. In Who Really Cares, he demonstrates conclusively that conservatives really are compassionate--far more compassionate than their liberal foes. Strong families, church attendance, earned income (as opposed to state-subsidized income), and the belief that individuals, not government, offer the best solution to social ills--all of these factors determine how likely one is to give. Charity matters--not just to the givers and to the recipients, but to the nation as a whole. It is crucial to our prosperity, happiness, health, and our ability to govern ourselves as a free people. In Who Really Cares, Brooks outlines strategies for expanding the ranks of givers, for the good of all Americans.

____________

Praise for Who Really Cares:

"There will of course be many readers (and many more nonreaders) of Mr. Brooks's book who will dismiss it on its face, and there will be fierce efforts mounted to discredit his analysis and data. Let them come. Who Really Cares should serve to change the public discussion dramatically. With any luck, it will be for our decade what Charles Murray's Losing Ground was for the 1980s (challenging the disincentive logic of welfare) or what Michael Harrington's The Other America was for the 1960s (highlighting the persistence of poverty amid affluence)--the text at the center of a constructive national debate."

--Wall Street Journal

"The next time you find yourself in a conversation about how liberals are caring and compassionate while conservatives are selfish and hard-hearted, you might want to refer your interlocutors to Who Really Cares."

--First Things

"Provocative. . . It's not just that charity helps those on the receiving end, says Brooks, an economist at Syracuse University in New York. It also strengthens the cohesion of society at large. Moreover, it appears to make the givers themselves more successful, possibly because the activity transforms them somewhat into better or happier people. Whatever the reasons, he finds that higher income tends to push up charity--and that greater charity tends to push up income."

--Christian Science Monitor

"[B]reaks new ground. . . In Who Really Cares, Arthur C. Brooks finds that religious conservatives are far more charitable than secular liberals, and that those who support the idea that government should redistribute income are among the least likely to dig into their own wallets to help others."

--Chronicle of Philanthropy

____________

Arthur C. Brooks is a visiting scholar at AEI.

Related Links
Book forum


Also by Arthur C. Brooks
Recent Articles
Don't Live Simply
Has Google Changed the World?
Where's the Outrage? Really.
Latest Book
Gross National Happiness
Why Happiness Matters for America--And How We Can Get More of It
Russia's Revolution

Meticulously researched and textured with fascinating details, these essays "show" as well as "tell" where Russia has been in the past fifteen years and where it is going.


Of Men and Materiel: The Crisis in Military Resources

This book explores a problem that has been building quietly for years: the military has been expending without expanding or even replacing what has been spent.