About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all books by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Title

BOOKS
About the AEI Press
Orders and Shipping
Book Reviews
Press Releases

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Books >  Why Groups Go to Extremes
Why Groups Go to Extremes
Print Mail
By Cass R. Sunstein
Posted: Thursday, August 21, 2008
Why Groups Go to Extremes with border
Dimensions: 5.5'' x 8.5''
40 pages
AEI Press  (Washington)
Publication Date: September 2008
Paperback
ISBN: 978-0-8447-4267-0
Price: $ 10.00
Add to Cart  
Examination Copies

Download the full text of Why Groups Go to Extremes from the AEI Center for Regulatory and Market Studies.

Download file View the press release for Why Groups Go to Extremes

How does group behavior drive extremism and challenge democratic values? The answer lies in social dynamics--the ways people influence one another.

Conventional wisdom suggests that open discussion within groups will lead to compromise and moderation, yet just the opposite often occurs. In the course of exchanging opinions, like-minded people frequently develop more extreme versions of their original views on such issues as climate change, labor policy, same-sex relationships, and affirmative action. Groups ranging from citizens' forums to judicial panels tend to squelch diversity and polarize opinion. With the Internet facilitating the formation of like-minded groups, this phenomenon may help account for the intensity and division of contemporary social and political debate. Indeed, the dangers of homogeneity and polarization within groups highlight a fundamental tension between the consequences of free speech and assembly, and the value of intellectual diversity to a civil society.

In Why Groups Go to Extremes, Cass R. Sunstein argues that the key to preventing the spread of extremist views is not to suppress deliberation among the like-minded; such groups productively challenge conventional thinking and majority opinion. Instead, policymakers should develop institutions to ensure that like-minded groups encounter a diversity of opinions within civil society. The goal, Sunstein contends, must be to create opportunities for civil deliberation that expose like-minded group members to opposing views, while exposing society at large to the views of such groups.

Cass R. Sunstein is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and the recipient of the 2007 AEI Reg-Markets Center Distinguished Lecture Award.



Table of Contents

Acknowledgments

 

Foreword, Robert Hahn

 

Why Groups Go to Extremes

           

The Basic Phenomenon

Citizens

Federal Judges and Polarized Differences

Juries

Why Polarization? Some Explanations

            Information Strengthens Antecedent Beliefs

            Corroboration Breeds Confidence, Which Breeds Extremism

            Social Comparisons Shift Positions

Polarization and Democracy

            Polarizing Events and Polarization Entrepreneurs

            Outgroups

            Feuds, Ethnic and International Strife, and War

            The Internet, Communications Policy, and Mass Deliberation

Deliberative Trouble

Why Deliberate?

The Virtues of Heterogeneity

Enclave Deliberation and Suppressed Voices

The Public Sphere and Appropriate Heterogeneity

 

Notes

 

About the Author

Related Links
AEI Center for Regulatory and Market Studies
Press release


Russia's Revolution

Meticulously researched and textured with fascinating details, these essays "show" as well as "tell" where Russia has been in the past fifteen years and where it is going.


Of Men and Materiel: The Crisis in Military Resources

This book explores a problem that has been building quietly for years: the military has been expending without expanding or even replacing what has been spent.