About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all books by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Title

BOOKS
About the AEI Press
Orders and Shipping
Book Reviews
Press Releases

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Books >  Making Tort Law
Making Tort Law
Print Mail
What Should Be Done and Who Should Do It
By Charles Fried, David Rosenberg
Posted: Saturday, March 1, 2003
Making Tort Law
Dimensions: 6'' x 9''
120 pages
AEI Press  (Washington)
Publication Date: March 2003
Paperback
ISBN: 0-8447-4178-7
Price: $ 20.00
Add to Cart  
Examination Copies

View the summary and press release.

In the popular imagination, tort law is associated with films like Silkwood, A Civil Action, The Insider, and Erin Brockovich, in which courageous, beleaguered plaintiffs' lawyers battle the malevolent forces of "big business" and occasionally pull off startling victories that vindicate the rights of ordinary people. Apart from a few eye-popping verdicts, the reality is quite different.

In Making Tort Law: What Should Be Done and Who Should Do It, Harvard law professors Charles Fried and David Rosenberg note that the system of tort liability in the United States seeks to achieve a variety of aims: to compensate individuals injured by the risky business activities of large entities; to create incentives for those entities to take into account the dangers of their activities in the design of their processes, products, and services; and to allow individuals who feel powerless to make their grievances felt against large, impersonal, and sometimes unresponsive organizations. The authors contend, however, that our current tort system is almost certainly not the best possible way to achieve those goals. At best, they claim, compensation represents an uncertain, delayed, and expensive form of insurance. In addition, the disciplining effect on business is haphazard.

Fried and Rosenberg assess the comparative advantages of courts and legislatures in taking the initiative of changing tort law to further the social objective of optimally managing accident risk. They conclude that the nature of the change involved--particularly the function that the change would serve and the means that would work best--strongly suggests that the legislature should play the major role in designing tort reform. And they contend that automobile and other nonbusiness-related accidents should be eliminated from the tort system. [more...]

Charles Fried is the Beneficial Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. David Rosenberg is a professor of law at Harvard Law School.



Table of Contents

Foreword
Acknowledgements

  1. Introduction
  2. Making Tort Law for the Individual Good
  3. Options for Managing Accident Risk
  4. Guidelines and Applications

Notes
Index
About the Authors



View Book Summary
Related Links
Press release about the book
Related article on reviewing tort law
Related book forum
Liability Project


Real Education
Real Education

In his new book, Real Education: Four Simple Truths for Bringing America's Schools Back to Reality, AEI's Charles Murray focuses on four simple, hard truths that are rarely discussed or even acknowledged by educators and politicians.


Gross National Happiness
Gross National Happiness

In this provocative new book, Arthur C. Brooks explodes the myths about happiness in America. He examines vast amounts of evidence and empirical research to uncover the truth about who is happy in America, who is not, and why.