|
Date:
|
Monday, July 8, 2002
|
|
Time:
|
3:00 PM — 5:00 PM
|
|
Location:
|
Wohlstetter Conference Center, Twelfth Floor, AEI 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036
|
About This Event
Did the Supreme Court’s “federalism revolution” survive the tragic events of 9/11? Many pundits were quick to predict that it could not: Constitutional limitations and dual sovereignty were, for many, much too quaint for a post-Osama world. The just-completed term, however, may suggest a different conclusion. Proper division of power between states and nation is still very much on the justices’ agenda, as evidenced by this term’s preemption, sovereign immunity, First Amendment, and Section 1983 cases, Join us for a review of the October 2001 term featuring Federalism Project director Michael S. Greve and four distinguished guest panelists. On the docket: potentially far-reaching--and largely ignored--decisions such as Federal Maritime Commission, Gonzaga, and Rush Prudential, as well as a preview of the October 2002 term. Cocktails to follow.
Agenda
| 2:45 p.m. | Registration |
| 3:00 | Introduction: | Michael S. Greve, AEI |
| Panelists: | Evan Caminker, University of Michigan Law School |
| | Walter Dellinger, O'Melveny & Myers, LLP, and Duke University School of Law |
| | John Harrison, University of Virginia School of Law |
| | Michael Rappaport, University of San Diego School of Law |
| 5:00 | Adjournment and Cocktails |
Event Materials
Transcripts
Documents & Links
EMAIL
PRINT
SAVE
