What Should Replace Fannie and Freddie?
January 25, 2011
Online registration for this event is closed. Walk-in registrations may be accepted.
Video of this event will be livestreamed online at http://www.american.com/watch/aei-livestream
Republican members of Congress stress that addressing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is an essential part of creating a better housing finance market for the future. The Democratic administration is committed to publishing a plan this month. With even Representative Barney Frank (D-MA) saying Fannie and Freddie should be "abolished," everyone agrees that the old government-sponsored enterprise model should be replaced. But with what? Many voices plead for one form or another of continuing government guarantees of mortgage loans. Is this really necessary, and why? A common argument is that only government involvement can preserve the thirty-year fixed-rate mortgage. Is that true? Our expert panel will debate what should be done about Fannie and Freddie and the financially huge, politically charged mortgage finance sector in general.
Video of this event will be livestreamed online at http://www.american.com/watch/aei-livestream
Republican members of Congress stress that addressing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is an essential part of creating a better housing finance market for the future. The Democratic administration is committed to publishing a plan this month. With even Representative Barney Frank (D-MA) saying Fannie and Freddie should be "abolished," everyone agrees that the old government-sponsored enterprise model should be replaced. But with what? Many voices plead for one form or another of continuing government guarantees of mortgage loans. Is this really necessary, and why? A common argument is that only government involvement can preserve the thirty-year fixed-rate mortgage. Is that true? Our expert panel will debate what should be done about Fannie and Freddie and the financially huge, politically charged mortgage finance sector in general.








