Fixing the 2012 farm bill: Where do we go from here?
The fiscal costs of Price Loss Coverage in the 2012 farm bill
Video
About This Event

 

 

 

In an engaging presentation at the Longworth House of Representatives Office Building on Wednesday, leading agricultural economists examined the budget implications of two programs contained in the House Agricultural Committee’s proposed 2012 farm bill, reflecting a recently released AEI American Boondoggle working paper. Barry Goodwin of North Carolina State University began by explaining how farm households have benefitted from high crop prices and government assistance, now earning more than the median U.S. household and carrying very low debt-to-asset ratios relative to other business sectors.

Vince Smith of Montana State University and AEI then alleged that the Congressional Budget Office's scoring of the Price Loss Coverage and Supplementary Coverage Option provisions fails to examine scenarios under which crop prices fall to recent historical average levels. In this scenario, he cautioned, the costs of these programs would balloon to $20 billion annually, drastically exceeding those of the direct payments program they would replace.
--Brad Wassink

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine

What's new on AEI

The Federal Reserve's policy dilemma
image Unemployment benefits barely soften the blow of joblessness
image Stop the US-China bilateral investment treaty talks
image US still has time to stake out a position of strength on Ukraine
AEI Participants

 

Vincent H.
Smith
AEI on Facebook