Afghanistan's Presidential Election

Click here to view this Outlook as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

No. 1, January 2009

Hamid Karzai has been a solid partner for Washington, but in the past two years his rule has faltered. The Afghan government presently controls only 30 percent of the country's territory,[2] and humanitarian organizations deem almost half of the country too dangerous for aid workers.[3] Two thousand eight was the deadliest year for coalition troops since the fall of the Taliban in 2001. More than 1,445 civilians lost their lives in the first eight months due to Taliban action, coalition crossfire, and terrorist bombings.[4] For Afghanistan's leader to acquire the popular legitimacy necessary to lead the multiethnic country effectively, holding a timely presidential election will be essential.

In October 2004, Karzai was elected to a five-year term in the first direct vote for the presidency in Afghanistan's history. This year's election will demonstrate the Afghans' desire to reject the extremists opposing the current democratic process in the country. If an election does not occur by April 22, 2009, Afghanistan's constitution states that a loya jirga (grand assembly) must be convened. This would wreak havoc on Afghanistan's already fragile political and social fabric. The government would lose legitimacy and risk an ensuing constitutional crisis. For the Afghan elections to succeed, it is imperative that the Obama administration engage the issue immediately.

Preparing for Elections

Once an election date is set, security will be the next order of business. According to the United Nations (UN) special representative for Afghanistan, Kai Eide, security in Afghanistan is at its worst since the fall of the Taliban.[5] Once confined to the south--provinces such as Helmand and Kandahar--the insurgency has now reached more peaceful regions in central and western Afghanistan, including the provinces of Farah, Badghis, Logar, and Wardak. The Taliban has gained control of districts in Kabul's neighboring provinces, threatening the capital's population. Four out of seven districts of Logar province are reportedly under Taliban control.[6] There has also been a rise in suicide bombings, rocket attacks, and political assassinations.

Karzai himself has already escaped four assassination attempts, most recently at an April 28, 2008, independence day ceremony in Kabul.[7] On July 7, 2008, a suicide bombing at the Indian Embassy in Kabul killed 41 people and injured more than 140.[8] An emboldened Taliban killed three aid workers in Logar, less than sixty miles south of Kabul, in August 2008.[9] The following month, the Taliban assassinated Logar governor Abdullah Wardak.[10] And on November 14, 2008, Taliban gunmen killed Maulvi Shamsuddin, head of a religious council in the western province of Farah, bordering Iran, in response to his preaching against suicide attacks and violence.[11]

Despite deteriorating security, the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) launched the first of four phases of voter registration on October 6, 2008, registering 1 million eligible voters in fourteen provinces in north, northeast, and central Afghanistan. A month later, they began a second phase of registration in ten provinces, mainly in the north.[12] The third and fourth registration phases being launched in the more volatile eastern and southern provinces should finish before the end of February 2009.

Engaging the Taliban, which has rebuffed IEC efforts to enable its participation in elections, will not prevent violence. Fugitive Taliban leader Mullah Omar called on Afghans on the eve of the December Muslim Eid holiday to boycott the elections and promised renewed insurgency if foreign troops did not leave. "Do not allow yourselves to be deceived by this dishonest election announcement. In reality, the choice will be made in Washington."[13] The IEC's head in Logar province said on October 14 that registration rates in the province decreased by 30 percent after the Taliban distributed letters in villages warning people not to take part in the process.[14] On October 20, the Taliban destroyed a voter registration center in Ghazni[15] and murdered an election officer on November 9.[16] Intimidation is not the sole bailiwick of the Taliban. Local commanders are also culpable. On November 7, armed forces loyal to Hezb-e Islami's fugitive leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar kidnapped two election workers in Wardak,[17] a volatile province bordering Kabul.

U.S. officials have described Afghanistan's voter registration process as peaceful and successful.[18] Any such optimism is premature, especially because the process has just begun in areas in which insurgency is at its hottest. Unlike previous elections, the Afghan National Police are expected to be leading security arrangements. But a report by Grant Kippen, the former head of Afghanistan's Electoral Complaints Commission, warns that the inability of the police to travel in certain parts of southern Afghanistan could disenfranchise large numbers of Pashtuns.[19]

Ronald Neumann, U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan from 2005 to 2007, said in a November 12, 2008, interview, "Despite all security hazards, the elections could be implemented smoothly within the current security situation if adequate preparations are undertaken based on a thorough assessment of setting priorities and identifying the gaps,"[20] a general way of saying that a bit of insecurity will not be enough to deter elections. Indeed, the fact that two sets of elections in Afghanistan--the presidential one in 2004 and parliamentary elections in 2005--were held successfully amid widespread violence supports Neumann's assertion.

What preparations would therefore be needed? Defense Secretary Robert Gates's November 21, 2008, announcement to add an additional twenty thousand U.S. forces should help. Admiral Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on December 20, 2008, that the number could rise to thirty thousand troops.[21] Some 3,500 to 4,000 troops from Fort Drum in New York have already begun deploying. On an unannounced trip to Afghanistan on December 11, Gates said he hoped to deploy two more combat brigades in Afghanistan by the spring.[22]

NATO countries should also contribute to this surge in manpower, at least provisionally through the end of the election. But European allies have shown little interest in increasing troop levels so far. After meeting with General David Petraeus, Italian defense minister Ignazio La Russa said on December 10 that Italy would temporarily increase its number of troops in Afghanistan by five hundred for six months next year,[23] but his earlier remarks indicate that the additional forces will be military trainers for the Afghan security forces, not combat troops.[24] News sources indicate that the British troop withdrawal from Iraq will allow that nation to send between two thousand and five thousand additional troops to Afghanistan.[25] But the British timetable for withdrawal from Iraq is between March and June,[26] and redeployment may take additional time. Germany has refused to deploy to restive regions in the east and south. Chancellor Angela Merkel may also not risk losing public support by sending additional troops to a combat zone ahead of the German elections slated for September 2009.

Pakistan's cooperation will also be vital for election security. The Pakistani government boosted its troop levels and intensified patrols along the borders to prevent cross-border infiltration of insurgents in the run-up to the September 2005 parliamentary elections in Afghanistan.[27] Afghan militia groups have also played an active part in providing security in previous contests. But with many militia groups joining the insurgents, it is unwise to involve them in security arrangements.

Making Votes Count

Enabling Afghans to cast ballots will be difficult. Making those ballots count may be as much of a challenge. Fraud and irregularities have marred Afghanistan's previous elections. In the 2004 presidential vote, all candidates but Karzai alleged voter fraud and threatened to discount the results.[28] The IEC is under increasing criticism over questions of its independence and impartiality. Mohammad Daud Soltanzoi, a member of parliament from Ghazni province, has accused the IEC of trying to cheat in favor of Karzai,[29] who appointed all nine members of the commission, including the chairperson and deputy chairperson, on January 19, 2005.[30] In previous elections, involving international organizations and monitors may have mitigated problems with the IEC, but the commission has since assumed lead authority over elections. Kippen's report also points out that some of the IEC chairman's statements suggest that the commission is not impartial.[31]

Insufficient funding has also hindered preparations. The past two elections cost a total of $359 million.[32] The IEC, however, has been unable to secure the $102 million pledged by donors for the current four-phase voter registration process.[33] In contrast to previous elections, current funding problems have resulted in an absence of registration and polling centers in neighboring countries,[34] denying over 2 million eligible Afghan citizens residing in Iran and Pakistan access to vote. According to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, over 4 million registered and unregistered Afghans currently live in Pakistan and Iran[35]--over 15 percent of Afghanistan's population. Insufficient funding may also retard turnout. An Asia Foundation survey found that only 53 percent of respondents were aware of the upcoming 2009 election, and just under 48 percent said they knew how to register to vote.[36]

Who Will Win?

The election is up for grabs. Karzai may be the face of Afghanistan in the West, but domestically his legacy is in tatters. His approval rating, once at 83 percent,[37] has declined because he has not improved security or curbed corruption. He can claim some successes: Despite some setbacks, independent and free media flourish. More students graduated from high school in 2008 than in any previous year, and 40 percent of these graduates were girls.[38] Barred from work under the Taliban, women have resurfaced in sociopolitical arenas, securing 68 parliamentary seats out of 249 in the conservative Afghan parliament.[39]

While Karzai's efforts to set up Afghanistan's democratic and political institutions have been largely successful, he has been less successful making the institutions function properly. Despite billions of dollars spent on development by the United States, its NATO partners, and other donor nations over the past seven years, some 20 million out of an estimated 25 million Afghans living in the country remain below the poverty line,[40] and the country ranked 176 out of 180 nations in Transparency International's 2008 Corruption Perceptions Index, surpassed by only Haiti, Iraq, Myanmar, and Somalia.[41] The New York Times has linked Karzai's brother, Ahmad Wali Karzai, to the heroin trade,[42] confirming conventional wisdom among many Afghans.

Karzai's recent offer of amnesty to Taliban leaders, including Mullah Omar--which the Taliban flatly rejected[43]--is meant to slow or reverse his decline in popularity. Pashtun tribes, which make up about 40 percent of Afghanistan's population, support reconciliation with the Taliban. Karzai's maneuver, however, backfired among non-Pashtuns. The independent, pro-United National Front (UNF) daily Eqtedar-e Melli described Karzai's amnesty offer as a "reelection ploy";[44] Payam-e Mojahed, a weekly affiliated with Jamiat-e Islami, commented that Karzai's actions were "a bid for his own survival";[45] the independent daily Cheragh condemned it as "an electioneering gesture";[46] and the independent secular daily Hasht-e Sobh described it as "a political gamble."[47]

Can Karzai win a second term? Yes. He remains the strongest candidate, thanks to the fractious nature of the opposition and the absence of a heavyweight Pashtun rival. A recent report by the Congressional Research Service found that Karzai had an estimated 60 percent approval rating, a figure implying support transcending his own ethnic Pashtun community.[48] The Asia Foundation survey drew a similar conclusion.[49] Even if the polls overestimate Karzai's popularity, he benefits from both incumbency and deep-rooted ethnic and political divisions among the opposition. There are eighty-four political parties registered in Afghanistan.[50]

Still, there is real opposition. The main opposition bloc is the UNF (Jabha-e Mottahid-e Melli), a grand alliance of former jihadist factions, ex-Communist leaders, and various social and ethnic groups. Largely composed of non-Pashtun ethnic minority groups--such as Hezb-e Wahdat-e Eslami-yi Mardom-e Afghanistan (People's Islamic Unity Party of Afghanistan), currently chaired by Hazara leader Haji Mohammad Mohaqiq, and Jonbesh-e Melli-e Eslami-yi Afghanistan (Islamic Movement of Afghanistan), led by General Abdul Rashid Dostum--the alliance would have difficulty cobbling together sufficient support to unseat Karzai without appealing to Pashtuns. The coalition has yet to reach a consensus for a candidate (see table 1 for a list of possible candidates). Alliance leader Borhanuddin Rabbani, who backed Karzai in the 2004 election,[51] has ruled out supporting Karzai in the upcoming election.[52] Dostum and Mohaqiq may run independently. UNF leaders have also been unable to overcome poor reputations from their past records. Abdorrab Rasul Sayyaf, a former Northern Alliance leader and current member of parliament from Kabul, is accused by the Human Rights Watch of war crimes during factional fighting in Kabul between 1992 and 1994 and is notorious for continuing to seize people's land in his stronghold, Paghman District in Kabul.[53] Dostum was suspended from the government in February over the abduction of a political rival.[54] He is also rumored to be seeking asylum in Turkey as part of a deal with Karzai to drop all charges against him.[55]

Former interior minister Ali Ahmad Jalali and former finance minister Ashraf Ghani also present serious challenges to Karzai. Afghans consider both former Karzai cabinet members successful in their positions. While Ghani has not yet officially announced his candidacy, he has been nominated by Ejma-e Melli-e Afghanistan (National Association of Afghanistan), an alliance of thirty-two political parties and 342 people's councils.[56] Jalali is also considering his chances. "I'm in consultation with the Afghan people and tribal elders and will announce my decision whether or not to run for the presidency in one or two months," he said in a November 17 interview.[57] Jalali is opposed to forming alliances and will run on a "national agenda" to win.[58] Still, despite his achievements, Jalali is not well known among the Afghan masses--mainly because he spent almost two decades out of the country. Only with an extensive and well-funded campaign will he be able to present himself as a real challenger. A plethora of other candidates circulate at the margins.

When Will the Election Occur?

Even as candidates position themselves, a date for the election has not yet been established. Article 61 of the Afghanistan constitution stipulates that the president's term ends on the first of the Afghan month of Jawza (May 22), and the election must be held between thirty and sixty days before the end of the president's term in office, correlating to the period between March 23 and April 22, 2009. On November 19, Yunus Qanuni, speaker of parliament's lower house, said that Karzai agreed that the election could be held on the date established by the constitution.[59] However, Daud Ali Najafi, head of the IEC, which according to article 156 of the constitution has the authority and responsibility to conduct the election, said the next day that a delay of three months was necessary for holding the election "with full preparedness and transparency." He warned that many people may not have the ability to vote in May, a failure that could "bring the legitimacy of the polls under scrutiny."[60] Zekria Barakzai, deputy head of the IEC, explained that if the election is held on the date set by the constitution because of political pressure, the results will be "illegitimate." He cited cold weather and security as two main obstacles to voting and argued that article 55 of the election law permits the IEC to change the election date.[61] Both parliament and political parties such as the UNF and Hezb-e Democrat-e Afghanistan (Democratic Party of Afghanistan) have voiced opposition to any delay. "Any other dates will contradict the constitution. We are against any changes conflicting with the Afghan constitution," said Borhanuddin Rabbani, leader of the main opposition bloc. "The National Front wants the upcoming election to be held on time, and we don't want an illegitimate president."[62]

Should Afghan parties and organizations reach consensus and postpone the election, the delay will trigger another constitutional question: who will lead the country from May 22 until a winner is declared after the election takes place? Reaching agreement on this question will be difficult; U.S. officials should not assume that Afghans will consent to a continuation of Karzai's tenure. Some activists suggest that Karzai should hand power to the upper house of the parliament on May 22.[63] Others suggest that the president, according to article 67, transfer authority to the first vice president at the end of his term.[64] The IEC says Karzai's term can continue if the election is postponed,[65] a determination that many Afghan officials have called unconstitutional. "If Mr. Karzai remains in power even a single day after his legal term, which is next year on the first of Jawza, the government will face fierce resistance by all political parties and opposition groups and Afghanistan will lapse into a deeper crisis," said Abdul Kabir Ranjbar, the head of the parliament's Monitoring Commission of the Constitution.[66]

Can Obama and Karzai Work Together?

During his campaign, Barack Obama was critical of Karzai. On his July 19, 2008, trip to Afghanistan, Obama chided Karzai for not doing enough to promote good governance. "I told President Karzai that I thought that he needs to really focus on issues of corruption and counternarcotics and to counter the narcotics trade much more aggressively than has been done so far."[67] In an earlier interview, he told CNN, "I think the Karzai government has not gotten out of the bunker and helped organize Afghanistan and government, the judiciary, police forces, in ways that would give people confidence."[68] In the second presidential debate on October 7, Obama said, "We have to have a government that is responsive to the Afghan people, and frankly it's just not responsive right now."[69] The last meeting between Vice President Joe Biden and Karzai was reportedly so tense that Biden walked out.[70] Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was the latest to blast Karzai's administration. Just days before taking office, she branded Afghanistan a "narco-state" whose government was "plagued by limited capacity and widespread corruption."[71]

Such criticism is not lost on Afganistan's population and has fueled speculation that Obama plans to enact his mantra of change here as well. A front-page headline in the independent daily Arman-e Melli read, "Obama will begin changes in Afghanistan by dismissing Karzai."[72] And the Daily Afghanistan wrote, "The lucky star of President Karzai will fall with the victory of Obama."[73] Hasht-e Sobh opined that Obama would seek a replacement for Karzai.[74] The Iranian media has also fueled such speculation. "Americans are trying to call into question the president's popularity and damage his standing in Afghanistan to replace him with another individual in the forthcoming presidential elections," the Voice of the Islamic Republic of Iran said in a special news bulletin on Afghanistan.[75] The Iranian daily Sarmayeh described Obama's foreign policy team as a "nightmare" for Karzai.[76]

Karzai's fears that he can no longer take U.S. support for granted are manifested in a recent dramatic shift in attitude. Beyond his outreach to the Taliban, his tone has become more confrontational since Obama's victory. In offering protection for the Taliban's reclusive leader, Mullah Omar, Karzai told the press in Kabul on November 16, "If I say I want protection for Omar, then the international community has two choices: remove me or leave if they disagree. And both are good."[77] Never before has the president described the departure of foreign troops as "good" for the country. In a November 25 speech to a visiting UN Security Council delegation, Karzai for the first time called for a timetable for ending the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan.[78] Karzai's confrontational posture should concern Obama--who, despite enormous domestic and foreign challenges, has pledged to put Afghanistan at the top of his agenda--especially since Karzai's call for a timetable to withdraw foreign forces comes as the Pentagon sends an additional twenty thousand to thirty thousand troops into the theater.[79]

What should Obama do? Holding the 2009 presidential election on time or with only minimal delay as provided by the constitution is essential for Afghanistan's political transformation to democracy and stability. Over 8 million Afghan men and women braved extremists' threats to cast ballots in the 2004 election. Despite poor living conditions, Afghans' support for democracy remains upbeat.[80] For Afghanistan's president to enjoy a future of popular legitimacy, the election must be fair and credible in the eyes of Afghans.

The incoming Obama administration should focus not on individuals, but instead on strengthening democratic institutions in the country. Taking sides in the Afghan election would have many negative implications. First, if the United States backs Karzai to win a second term, this will cast doubt on Afghanistan's independence and portray foreign forces as occupiers. "The more explicit America's role in the Afghan elections," Neumann points out, "the more validation [this gives] to the Taliban's propaganda that the Americans rule the country, not Afghans."[81] Alternatively, if the United States endorses another candidate, the incumbent government will feel threatened and may start to remove officials with U.S. ties and seek out alternative foreign allies hostile to the United States--Iran and Russia, for example.

America's main objective in Afghanistan is to help that nation establish a government that is democratically elected, is stable, can stand on its own, and is a reliable U.S. friend and ally in the fight against terrorism. This cannot be achieved with an Afghan president who is hostile to the United States and a friend to its foes. Karzai, despite his declining popularity, is still the strongest candidate in the race and has a chance to win a second term. Even if he loses in the coming election, he will remain the president for the next four to eight months. The Obama administration should work with him closely to tackle growing security and governance problems ahead of the election, even as it withholds its endorsement. This will signal that good governance requires transformation of a system and not investment in only one man, however convenient incumbency can be.

Ahmad Majidyar ([email protected]) is a research assistant at AEI.

AEI resident scholar Michael Rubin, research program manager Caroline Sevier, and associate editor Christy Hall Robinson worked with Mr. Majidyar to edit and produce this Middle Eastern Outlook.

Click here to view this Outlook as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.


1. "2008 Afghanistan's 'Worst Year': Minister," Agence France-Presse (AFP), October 14, 2008.
2. Pam Benson, "Intelligence Chief: Taliban Making Gains in Afghanistan," CNN, February 28, 2008.
3. Chietigj Bajpaee, "Election 2009: Voter Registration Begins for Presidential Election in Afghanistan," Global Insight, October 9, 2008.
4. "UN Rights Chief Urges Protection amid Sharp Rise in Afghan Civilian Deaths," UN News Centre, December 16, 2008.
5. "Afghanistan Security at Worst since Fall of Taliban: UN Envoy," AFP, November 18, 2008.
6. "Some Afghans Live under Taliban Rule--and Prefer It," Christian Science Monitor, October 15, 2008.
7. Richard Beeston, "Taleban Breach Major Security in Fourth Karzai Assassination Attempt," Times (London), April 28, 2008.
8. Abdul Waheed Wafa and Alan Cowell, "Suicide Car Blast Kills 41 in Afghan Capital," New York Times, July 8, 2008.
9. Michael Gisick, "The Battle for Afghanistan: Isolation Defines Fight in the Deadly East," Stars and Stripes, October 27, 2008.
10. "Walee Logar dar enfejar-e dar gharb-e Kabul koshta shod" [Logar Governor Killed in West Kabul], BBC Persian, September 13, 2008, available in Dari at (accessed January 22, 2009).
11. "Hamid Karzai qatl-e shura-e ulema-e woloswalee Anar Dara-e Farah raa taqbeh kard" [Hamid Karzai Condemned Assassination of Head of Religious Council of Anar Dara District of Farah],, November 16, 2008, available in Dari at (accessed January 22, 2009).
12. Independent Election Commission (IEC) Secretariat, "IEC Press Release on Progress of Voter Registration Process," news release, November 13, 2008, available at (accessed January 22, 2009).
13. "Mullah Omar Calls on Afghans to Boycott Polls," Daily Times (Pakistan), December 8, 2008.
14. "Talibano da shpe pano pa khparawolo khalk pa taakano ke gadoon na mana kral" [Taliban Prevented People from Participation in Elections by Distributing Night Letters], Pajhwok Afghan News (PAN), October 14, 2008, available in Pashto at (accessed January 22, 2009).
15. UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Integrated Regional Information Networks, "Security Concerns over Voter Registration Process," October 23, 2008, available at (accessed January 22, 2009).
16. "Yak mamoor-e daftar-e sabt-e naam-e entekhaabat ba qatel raseed" [Voter Registration Official Killed], PAN, November 9, 2008, available in Dari at (accessed January 22, 2009).
17. "Da takano da noom lekane yaw kar kawonke le motar chalawonke sara wotakhtawal sho" [Election Worker and His Driver Kidnapped], PAN, November 9, 2008, available in Pashto at (accessed January 22, 2009).
18. Anna Mulrine, "Afghanistan's Voter Registration Drive Is Unexpectedly Peaceful and Successful,", November 12, 2008.
19. Grant Kippen, Elections in 2009 and 2010: Technical and Contextual Challenges to Building Democracy in Afghanistan (Kabul: Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, November 2008), available at (accessed January 22, 2009).
20. Ronald Neumann, personal interview with the author, November 12, 2008.
21. Jason Straziuso, "U.S. Might Double Afghanistan Force," Associated Press, December 20, 2008.
22. Elisabeth Bumiller, "Gates Seeks More Troops in Afghanistan by Spring," New York Times, December 11, 2008.
23. "Italy Plans Temporary Increase in Afghan Forces," AFP, December 10, 2008.
24. "Petraeus Favours U.S. Troop Surge in Afghanistan," AFP, December 9, 2008.
25. Jerome Starkey and Kim Sengupta, "Troop Surge to Break Afghan 'Stalemate,'" Independent (London), December 11, 2008.
26. John F. Burns, "Britain's Iraq Pullout Timeline Reported," New York Times, December 10, 2008.
27. "Extra Troops for Afghan Border," BBC News, July 7, 2005.
28. "Candidates Want New Afghan Presidential Election: Officials to Look into Charges; Unclear If Vote Will Stand," CNN, October 9, 2004.
29. "Afghan Parliamentary Committees Discuss Controversy over Election Date," Tolo TV, October 16, 2008.
30. For further information, see the IEC website, available in English at (accessed January 22, 2009).
31. Graeme Smith, "Poor Security Imperils Afghan Vote, Report Warns," Globe and Mail (Canada), November 21, 2001.
32. Sayed Salahuddin, "Afghanistan's Presidential Poll Set for Late 2009," Reuters, April 9, 2008.
33. Grant Kippen, Elections in 2009 and 2010: Technical and Contextual Challenges to Building Democracy in Afghanistan.
34. "Afghans Abroad Cannot Vote Due to Lack of Election Funding," Radio Afghanistan, November 16, 2008.
35. Hamid Shalizi, "Voluntary Afghan Refugee Repatriation Paramount: U.N.," Reuters, November 19, 2008.
36. Ruth Rennie, Sudhindra Sharma, and Pawan Sen, Afghanistan in 2008: A Survey of the Afghan People (San Francisco: Asia Foundation, 2008), available at (accessed January 22, 2009).
37. Stephen Weber, "Afghan Public Opinion amidst Rising Violence,", December 14, 2006.
38. Ministry of Education, Department of Planning, "Progress Report--1386," available at (accessed January 22, 2009).
39. Wahidullah Amani and Salima Ghafari, "Is Afghanistan Ready for Women in Parliament?" Institute for War and Peace Reporting, November 15, 2005.
40. Bashir Payman, "Afghanistan: 20 million nafar zer-e khat-e faqr" [Afghanistan: 20 Million under Poverty Line], BBC Persian, October 17, 2008, available in Dari at (accessed January 22, 2009).
41. Transparency International, "Corruption Perceptions Index 2008," available at (accessed January 22, 2009).
42. James Risen, "Reports Link Karzai's Brother to Afghanistan Heroin Trade," New York Times, October 4, 2008.
43. "Taliban Spurn Afghan President's Offer for Talks," Associated Press, November 16, 2008.
44. "Negotiations with the Taleban Are an Election Campaign," Eqtedar-e Melli, October 11, 2008.
45. "Struggle for Peace or Haggling for Survival," Payam-e Mojahed, November 20, 2008.
46. Besmellah Naderi, "Is There a Bid to Rescue Mullah Omar?" Cheragh, November 19, 2008.
47. "Taleban Are Unwilling for Negotiations with the Government," Hasht-e Sobh, November 18, 2008.
48. Kenneth Katzman, Afghanistan: Post-War Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, updated November 26, 2008), available at (accessed January 22, 2009).
49. Ruth Rennie, Sudhindra Sharma, and Pawan Sen, Afghanistan in 2008: A Survey of the Afghan People.
50. The list of licensed political parties is available on the Ministry of Justice website at (accessed January 22, 2009).
51. Sattar Sayedi, "Hemayat-e rabbani az Karzai" [Rabbani's Support to Karzai], BBC Persian, October 3, 2004.
52. "Rahbari Jabha Melli: Azmoda raa azmodan khatast" [Leadership of National Front: It Is a Mistake to Test Those Already Tested], United National Front, December 14, 2008, available in Dari at (accessed January 22, 2009).
53. "Sayyaf az jenayat taa ghasp-e zameen" [Sayyaf: From Crime to Land Seizure],, June 8, 2008, available in Dari at (accessed January 22, 2009).
54. "Ex-Afghan Warlord Is Suspended," BBC News, February 19, 2008.
55. "Ba gozaresh-e rasana haa, General Dostum dar jostojoi panahendagi dar turkia ast" [According to Media, General Dostum Is Seeking Asylum in Turkey],, December 6, 2008, available in Dari at (accessed January 22, 2009). See also "Afghan General Rashid Dostum Flies to Exile in Turkey," Earth Times, December 4, 2008.
56. "Naamzadi-e Ashraf Ghani baray-e entekhaabat" [Ashraf Ghani's Nomination for Elections],, December 21, 2008, available in Dari at (accessed January 22, 2009).
57. Ali Ahmad Jalali, personal interview with the author, November 17, 2008.
58. Ibid.
59. Sahar, "Che kase Zamaan-e entekhaabat raa tayeen mekonad" [Who Decides on the Election Date?], Hasht-e Sobh, November 22, 2008.
60. "EC for Delay in Election Schedule," PAN, November 20, 2008.
61. "Da toltakano khpelwak kamesyoon wayee da pesarlay takany na qanuna da" [Independent Election Commission Says Spring Elections Illegal],, December 4, 2008, available in Pashto at (accessed January 22, 2009).
62. "Afghan Opposition Demands Election in April," Javno (Croatia), November 23, 2008, available at (accessed January 22, 2009).
63. "Political Activists Discuss Challenges ahead of the Elections," Ariana Afghanistan TV, November 13, 2008.
64. Zamoh Lawyers and Advisors, "Qanun-e asaasi dar mawred-e entekhaabat chi megoyad?" [What Does the Constitution Say about the Elections?],, November 19, 2008, available at (accessed January 22, 2009).
65. Tolo TV news bulletin, October 12, 2008.
66. "Kabir Ranjbar: Naqz-e qanun-e asaasi dar bargozaree entekhaabat jenayat ast" [Kabir Ranjbar: Violation of Constitution Regarding Execution of Polls Felony], Hasht-e Sobh, November 24, 2008.
67. Quoted in Caren Bohan, "Obama: Iran Should Take U.S. Engagement Seriously," Reuters, July 27, 2008.
68. Barack Obama, "Obama on Foreign Policy," interview by Fareed Zakaria, CNN, July 13, 2008.
69. Debate between presidential candidates John McCain and Barack Obama, Nashville, TN, October 7, 2008, transcript available at (accessed January 22, 2009).
70. "Afghanistan and the Obama Administration: No Dream Team for Karzai," The Economist, December 4, 2008.
71. Daniel Dombey and Jon Boone, "Clinton Signals New Line on Kabul," Financial Times, January 15, 2009.
72. Harun Amirzada, "It Would Be 'Unwise' for Obama to Keep Karzai as President," Arman-e Melli, November 19, 2008.
73. "Afghanistan's Welcoming of U.S. Election Result," Daily Afghanistan, November 9, 2008.
74. Hamid Roshan, "Aayaa entekhab-e democrat haa Hamid Karzai ast?" [Is Karzai Democrats' Choice?], Hasht-e Sobh, November 11, 2008.
75. "U.S. Administration Trying to Weaken Afghan President," Islamic Republic of Iran External Service (Mashhad), October 5, 2008.
76. "Teem-e seyasat-e khareji-e Obama kaboos-e Karzai" [Obama's Foreign Policy Team Nightmare for Karzai," Sarmayeh, December 8, 2008, available in Farsi at (accessed January 22, 2009).
77. Quoted in "Karzai Offers Taleban Safety Deal," BBC News, November 16, 2008.
78. "Karzai Urges Afghan War Timeline," BBC News, November 25, 2008.
79. Elisabeth Bumiller, "Gates Seeks More Troops in Afghanistan by Spring."
80. Ruth Rennie, Sudhindra Sharma, and Pawan Sen, Afghanistan in 2008: A Survey of the Afghan People.
81. Ronald Neumann, personal interview with the author.


Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author


Ahmad K.

What's new on AEI

AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters
image A nation divided by marriage
image Teaching reform
image Socialist party pushing $20 minimum wage defends $13-an-hour job listing
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
Monday, October 20, 2014 | 2:00 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Warfare beneath the waves: The undersea domain in Asia

We welcome you to join us for a panel discussion of the undersea military competition occurring in Asia and what it means for the United States and its allies.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014 | 8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters

AEI’s Election Watch is back! Please join us for two sessions of the longest-running election program in Washington, DC. 

Wednesday, October 22, 2014 | 1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.
What now for the Common Core?

We welcome you to join us at AEI for a discussion of what’s next for the Common Core.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, October 23, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.
Brazil’s presidential election: Real challenges, real choices

Please join AEI for a discussion examining each candidate’s platform and prospects for victory and the impact that a possible shift toward free-market policies in Brazil might have on South America as a whole.

Event Registration is Closed
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.