Money market funds -- a solution?

Statement No. 342: Money market funds -- a solution?

Download PDF
There has been an ongoing controversy over whether money market funds (MMFs) pose a possible risk of systemic runs because of the prevailing policy of redeeming shares at a fixed par value of $1 even if the net asset value (NAV) of a share has fallen below that number. The risk is that shareholders may rush to redeem at the par value before the fund is forced by declines in portfolio value to "break the buck" and redeem at the lower NAV.

It has been reported that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is considering a proposed resolution to the question by making a distinction between two kinds of funds: 'government' funds (invested only in government securities) and 'prime' funds (invested more broadly in corporate and other securities), and require only the prime funds to redeem at a 'floating' NAV. Many MMFs are already disclosing their daily NAV, which enables shareholders to judge whether they are approaching a break point, and the Committee would support adopting a rule to that effect.

Institutional shareholders with large accounts are far more likely to respond to small declines below a $1 par and redeem, so some in the industry have urged that the floating NAV apply to all institutional funds, a position the committee has previously endorsed (Statement No. 309, February 14, 2011). There is a better case to be made for allowing sponsors of retail prime funds (with much smaller accounts) to continue a policy of redemption at par if they so choose (incurring at times the possible cost of making some contributions to the fund's capital). How tenable that policy would prove to be, in the light of daily posting of the portfolio NAV, would be determined by management's investment policy and willingness to absorb some capital losses in order to maintain par redemption. But the decision could be left to management judgment in individual retail funds, rather than a universal regulatory mandate, with little prospect of wide-spread runs posing systemic risk to the financial stability of the United States. This course might facilitate an end to the SEC deadlock on the issue.

 

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine

What's new on AEI

Making Ryan's tax plan smarter
image The teacher evaluation confronts the future
image How to reform the US immigration system
image Inversion hysteria
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 01
    MON
  • 02
    TUE
  • 03
    WED
  • 04
    THU
  • 05
    FRI
Wednesday, September 03, 2014 | 9:00 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.
From anarchy to Augustus: Lessons on dealing with disorder, from Rome’s first emperor

We invite you to join us for two panel discussions on how Augustus created order from chaos 2,000 years ago, and what makes for durable domestic and international political systems in the 21st century.

Wednesday, September 03, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Multiple choice: Expanding opportunity through innovation in K–12 education

Please join us for a book launch event and panel discussion about how a marketplace of education options can help today's students succeed in tomorrow's economy. Attendees will receive a complimentary copy of the featured book.

Thursday, September 04, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
How conservatives can save the safety net

Please join us for a luncheon event in which our panel will discuss what conservatives can learn from how liberals talk and think about the safety net and where free-market economics, federalism, and social responsibility intersect to lift people out of poverty.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.