Public sector pensions in Nebraska

Article Highlights

  • Nebraska's cash-balance plan presents what could be a model for public sector pension reform

    Tweet This

  • Cash-balance pension plans allow employers to attract young, mobile employees

    Tweet This

  • Cash-balance plans put Nebraska is good position relative to other stats on pensions

    Tweet This

Yesterday, the Platte Institute released its policy study on public sector pensions, examining the benefits and shortcomings of Nebraska's unique cash-balance plan.

The cash-balance plan (CB) presents what could be a model for public sector pension reform, as CBs offer some of the better aspects of both traditional defined benefit pensions (DB)-the most common public sector pension-and defined contribution plans (DC)-401(k)-type plans that dominate in the private sector and where participants bear the investment risk. CBs offer far greater portability than DB pensions, allowing public employers to attract young mobile employees and removing disincentives for employees to leave.

"Nebraska's CB plans are innovative and could be a model for other states to follow as they try and bring their budgets and pensions under control."--Andrew Biggs

However, CB and DB plans both operate under a set of accounting rules that economists almost universally believe understates pension liabilities and hides investment risks borne by taxpayers. In the case of Nebraska's cash balance plans, this arises through the government's guarantee of a 5 percent annual return on account balances regardless of the returns available in the market. Such a guarantee is easily priced and shows the true costs of the Nebraska cash balance plan to be far greater than currently understood.

While the cash balance plan claims to be 95 percent funded, when the market value of the rate of return guarantee is included, the plan is only around 50 percent funded. Claims by pension managers that market values do not apply to government plans are not supported by the vast majority of economists; to dismiss market evaluations imperils taxpayer money.

CB plans also allow greater financial transparency than DB plans by making their rate of return guarantees explicit and easier to understand. Yet they are still not the most transparent system; DC plans are by far the most transparent and the least susceptible to gaming by employees and policymakers alike. Furthermore, when DC plans are set up as thrift savings plans, they become even more beneficial for both recipients and taxpayers, as they allow retiring workers to easily and inexpensively convert a lump sum into a lifetime income.

While Nebraska is in better shape than most states, there is still work to be done. Nebraska's CB plans are innovative and could be a model for other states to follow as they try and bring their budgets and pensions under control. Yet there are other, more transparent and taxpayer-friendly ways Nebraska could construct the pension system. But for the time being, cash balance plans are putting Nebraska in a very good position relative to other states.

The full policy study may be viewed here.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author


Andrew G.
  • Andrew G. Biggs is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where he studies Social Security reform, state and local government pensions, and public sector pay and benefits.

    Before joining AEI, Biggs was the principal deputy commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA), where he oversaw SSA’s policy research efforts. In 2005, as an associate director of the White House National Economic Council, he worked on Social Security reform. In 2001, he joined the staff of the President's Commission to Strengthen Social Security. Biggs has been interviewed on radio and television as an expert on retirement issues and on public vs. private sector compensation. He has published widely in academic publications as well as in daily newspapers such as The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post. He has also testified before Congress on numerous occasions. In 2013, the Society of Actuaries appointed Biggs co-vice chair of a blue ribbon panel tasked with analyzing the causes of underfunding in public pension plans and how governments can securely fund plans in the future.

    Biggs holds a bachelor’s degree from Queen's University Belfast in Northern Ireland, master’s degrees from Cambridge University and the University of London, and a Ph.D. from the London School of Economics.

  • Phone: 202-862-5841
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Kelly Funderburk
    Phone: 202-862-5920

What's new on AEI

image The Census Bureau and Obamacare: Dumb decision? Yes. Conspiracy? No.
image A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
image Give the CBO long-range tools
image The coming collapse of India's communists
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.