Download PDF On January 15, 2012, veteran education researcher Craig Jerald was feeling a little frustrated by the lack of discussion about education in the Republican primary debates. So he logged into his Twitter account to vent to his four hundred–plus followers: “Presidential debate moderators have mostly ignored education. Anyone miss ED in ’08 now???”
ED in ’08 (Education in 2008) was an effort to make education a big part of the 2008 presidential campaign—to make the candidates take education seriously and talk about it during debates and on the campaign stump. Jerald had poured his heart into the effort. Four years later, most others remembered it as a costly failure, if they remembered it at all.
Indeed, it didn’t take long for longtime thinktanker Andy (“Eduwonk”) Rotherham to respond to Jerald’s tweet: “OK, but what’s a good price per question? Those were expensive,” he asked, referring to the mere twenty education-related questions that moderators had asked the candidates in 2007 and 2008.
ED in ’08 was the largest single-issue advocacy campaign in the history of education reform. But the initiative, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates and Eli and Edythe Broad Foundations, was shuttered after just sixteen months and written off by outside observers and the funders themselves.
Heading into the 2012 campaign season, no one gave any serious thought to repeating the experiment. “We have no plans for another such effort,” Broad Foundation policy director Gregory McGinity said in a September 7, 2011, e-mail interview.
And yet, education advocacy organizations very much like ED in ’08 have proliferated in the years following the 2008 elections, as has philanthropic support for political advocacy. The Obama administration’s education priorities have resembled those pushed by ED in ’08 in several key regards. And, as Jerald noted, the 2012 campaign has been thus far devoid of much substantive discussion about education reform.
Was ED in ’08 a complete and utter failure, then, or the underappreciated prototype for what has become a widespread approach to promoting school reform and the hidden influence over the Obama education agenda? “At the time, it seemed irrelevant,” said Diane Ravitch, the New York University education historian and a prominent critic of current reform ideas. “Though in retrospect it may have set the groundwork. Little did we know.”
What's new on AEI
|Biden bows to China
|Miracle in Mooresville: How one school district defied the odds|
|Charitable giving in America|
|Republicans must step up and lead the fight for free trade|
At this event, Dinesh Thakur will discuss his experiences and the wider problems of Indian drug quality. Pharmaceutical and medical experts will then discuss Thakur’s remarks and the safety of US and international drugs.
Join us for a conversation with Governor Dannel Malloy as he discusses the successes and challenges of accomplishing school reform at the state level.
Join AEI in welcoming Michael Rubin for a Bradley Lecture discussing his upcoming book “Dancing with the devil: Lessons from negotiating with rogues and terrorists.”
At the Philanthropic Freedom Project's inaugural public event, AEI President Arthur Brooks will present his new research on how charitable giving has changed in the United States in the wake of the Great Recession and how those changes have serious ramifications for future tax policy.
The Air Force Association’s Mitchell Institute and AEI’s Marilyn Ware Center for Security Studies invite you to a forum with the 18th Air Force Chief of Staff General T. Michael Moseley (ret.) to discuss the imperative for air power in an increasingly uncertain world.
Thie event will address the economic implications of cultural fragmentation, the perception of capitalism in Western culture, and how economists can incorporate cultural considerations into their analyses.