Moving Towards a Unified Credit for Low Income Workers

The purpose of this paper is to put forward proposals that might be useful in simplifying the maze of tax credits that are typically available to low income individuals under the current tax code. Some of these include the Earned Income Tax Credit, the Child Tax Credit and the Additional Child Credit. Each of these programs has a bewildering and often confusing array of eligibility rules, with the result that some families that are entitled to these benefits do not file for them, while others that are not entitled receive benefits anyway. Moreover, there has been a tremendous growth in the size of these programs over time. For instance, in 2006, the EITC paid out almost $44 billion in tax credits while the child tax credits paid out about $47 billion. Overall, the size of all the different credits has grown by nearly 70 percent in just a 6 year period. Therefore an understanding of the actual redistributive impact of these credits and the targets that they were intended to achieve is critical today. Our paper therefore has two objectives. The first is to provide an analysis of the availability and the amount of the credits going to low income people. In other words, who is actually benefiting under the current system of tax credits? Second, we propose several alternatives to the existing tax credits that we hope will substantially simplify the tax code as it relates to the credits, while maintaining the redistributive principles that underlie it. As it stands today, the tax code provides incentives to work, to save and also attempts to offset the costs of raising children (such as child care expenses) and providing them an education. Therefore, we assess different proposals that might maintain these incentives either by only providing credits to families with children or individuals that work. Since it is unclear what weights society assigns to each of these incentives, we believe that providing an array of choices but explaining the costs associated with each and the target group that would benefit from each choice is the best approach to reach our final objective of having one simplified system of tax credits.

Click here to view the full text of this working paper as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Kevin A. Hassett is a senior fellow and the director of economic policy studies at AEI. Lawrence B. Lindsey is a visiting scholar at AEI. Aparna Mathur is a research fellow at AEI.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Kevin A.
Hassett

 

Lawrence B.
Lindsey

 

Aparna
Mathur

What's new on AEI

AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters
image A nation divided by marriage
image Teaching reform
image Socialist party pushing $20 minimum wage defends $13-an-hour job listing
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 20
    MON
  • 21
    TUE
  • 22
    WED
  • 23
    THU
  • 24
    FRI
Monday, October 20, 2014 | 2:00 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Warfare beneath the waves: The undersea domain in Asia

We welcome you to join us for a panel discussion of the undersea military competition occurring in Asia and what it means for the United States and its allies.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014 | 8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters

AEI’s Election Watch is back! Please join us for two sessions of the longest-running election program in Washington, DC. 

Wednesday, October 22, 2014 | 1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.
What now for the Common Core?

We welcome you to join us at AEI for a discussion of what’s next for the Common Core.

Thursday, October 23, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.
Brazil’s presidential election: Real challenges, real choices

Please join AEI for a discussion examining each candidate’s platform and prospects for victory and the impact that a possible shift toward free-market policies in Brazil might have on South America as a whole.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.