Money market funds -- a solution?

Statement No. 342: Money market funds -- a solution?

Download PDF
There has been an ongoing controversy over whether money market funds (MMFs) pose a possible risk of systemic runs because of the prevailing policy of redeeming shares at a fixed par value of $1 even if the net asset value (NAV) of a share has fallen below that number. The risk is that shareholders may rush to redeem at the par value before the fund is forced by declines in portfolio value to "break the buck" and redeem at the lower NAV.

It has been reported that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is considering a proposed resolution to the question by making a distinction between two kinds of funds: 'government' funds (invested only in government securities) and 'prime' funds (invested more broadly in corporate and other securities), and require only the prime funds to redeem at a 'floating' NAV. Many MMFs are already disclosing their daily NAV, which enables shareholders to judge whether they are approaching a break point, and the Committee would support adopting a rule to that effect.

Institutional shareholders with large accounts are far more likely to respond to small declines below a $1 par and redeem, so some in the industry have urged that the floating NAV apply to all institutional funds, a position the committee has previously endorsed (Statement No. 309, February 14, 2011). There is a better case to be made for allowing sponsors of retail prime funds (with much smaller accounts) to continue a policy of redemption at par if they so choose (incurring at times the possible cost of making some contributions to the fund's capital). How tenable that policy would prove to be, in the light of daily posting of the portfolio NAV, would be determined by management's investment policy and willingness to absorb some capital losses in order to maintain par redemption. But the decision could be left to management judgment in individual retail funds, rather than a universal regulatory mandate, with little prospect of wide-spread runs posing systemic risk to the financial stability of the United States. This course might facilitate an end to the SEC deadlock on the issue.

 

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine

What's new on AEI

AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters
image A nation divided by marriage
image Teaching reform
image Socialist party pushing $20 minimum wage defends $13-an-hour job listing
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 20
    MON
  • 21
    TUE
  • 22
    WED
  • 23
    THU
  • 24
    FRI
Monday, October 20, 2014 | 2:00 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Warfare beneath the waves: The undersea domain in Asia

We welcome you to join us for a panel discussion of the undersea military competition occurring in Asia and what it means for the United States and its allies.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014 | 8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters

AEI’s Election Watch is back! Please join us for two sessions of the longest-running election program in Washington, DC. 

Wednesday, October 22, 2014 | 1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.
What now for the Common Core?

We welcome you to join us at AEI for a discussion of what’s next for the Common Core.

Thursday, October 23, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.
Brazil’s presidential election: Real challenges, real choices

Please join AEI for a discussion examining each candidate’s platform and prospects for victory and the impact that a possible shift toward free-market policies in Brazil might have on South America as a whole.

Event Registration is Closed
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.