AEIdeas

The public policy blog of the American Enterprise Institute

Subscribe to the blog

Discussion: (3 comments)

  1. 1775Concord

    I can scarcely believe that point #7 came out of AEI. First, manufacturers of durable medical products have been subjected to a massive tax on gross income (not profits) in the Obamacare/Abysmalcare bill. Some companies are even cutting employees or going out of business. Further, much of this increase must be passed on to consumers…but all of can’t be. So how is a further cutting of reimbursement supposed to do anything but work to further cripple and even close these companies?
    But the most astounding thing of this post #7 is the seeming ignorance shown here of the already low, even pathetically low, reimbursement to doctors. Medicare is so low that already 30% of doctors (including my former family p. of 25 years) will not see even one Medicare patient, as reimbursement is below or at overhead in most cases. And many other doctors limit the number of Medicare patients they see. Medicaid is worse…and that is the rate at which those uninsureds, now to be on Medicaid, will pay doctors. Two examples: Neurosurgeon, does preoperative history and physical, meets family 0715, patient is pushed down to operative suite, catheters, lines, etc., are installed, surgery goes from 0900 to 1400, surgeon takes care of the patient for another 90 days, including several days in the hospital ICU, more days on the hospital floor. Medicare allows the brain surgeon $1.760.00…fully less than overhead, where just to keep the office open costs $150.00 per hour (whether the surgeon is in the office, in the OR, at a meeting, etc.). Second, a comparative income proposition: It’s like paying a gas station owner 80 cents a gallon for gas.
    And to look at an earlier item (#6, above): Can’t you see that the already low reimbursement to physicians, which you argue should be even lower, is one reason we have a shortage of physicians?

  2. I own a “Big Business” with 60 employees. The Affordable Care Act defines “Big Business” as 50 or more employees. IRS defines a big business as 500 or more employees. Did they forget a zero?

    I have 10 employees who work as needed because demand for my product substantially fluctuates. I do not cover them on our generous medical plan. Because they work more than 30 hours a week when they are working, under Affordable Care I must provide them with medical coverage, or I must drop all employees from coverage.

    I provide my Sales Manager with substantially better family medical coverage than I provide for my own family or any other employees. I agreed to this because I need him bringing in sales and such coverage was a requirement he set for working for me. His daughter has cancer and has a specific provider which they wish to keep. Now I will get fined under Affordable Care at the rate of (60-30) times $3,000 or $90,000 a year.

    1. As your leaders have told you, you should be so lucky as to be able to employ 60+ people. Your comrades in the Kremli….I mean White House expect you to pay your fair share. If you’re not willing to give up your own prosperity for the betterment of the less fortunate, they maybe you just need to be re-educated.

      Criket, I hope you know I’m being terribly sarcastic. I’m just as frustrated.

Comments are closed.

Sort By:

Refine Content:

Scholar

Additional Keywords:

Refine Results

or to save searches.

Open
Refine Content