The public policy blog of the American Enterprise Institute

Subscribe to the blog

Discussion: (15 comments)

  1. Jon Murphy

    I’m convinced “sustainable” and “organic” are one of those words that don’t actually mean anything.

    Other examples:

    “Made with real cheese!”

    “Fancy ketchup!”

    “Gourmet mayonnaise!”

    1. Seattle Sam

      Made with 10% real fruit juice (don’t laugh. it sells).

      Sustainable and organic work as concepts because they ARE so loosely defined. Furthermore the “benefits” are much more about YOU feeling you’re doing the RIGHT THING rather than any substantive benefit to the actions themselves. Sort of like recycling, which we’ve discussed here before. Or avoiding consuming paper to “save trees”.

      Having said that, I’m not here to argue that fooling yourself in order to feel good has no value.

    2. “Fancy ketchup!”

      I’ve always enjoyed that one. In all my long life and as hard as I’ve searched I’ve NEVER found any other kind. All ketchup is fancy.

  2. Lajaw Wilson

    This from the same man who said small doses of radiation from Fukushima and arsenic are good for you. And he is a proponent of using DDT. I’ll get my science from someone who isn’t a shill for the ag biotech companies.

    1. I’ll get my science from someone who isn’t a shill for the ag biotech companies.

      Wow! Nice ad hominem.

      But what about the excerpt above? Is Dr. Miller wrong? can you address it actual issues?

      1. Lajaw Wilson

        Production numbers between organic and conventional are about the same. After the first three years of transition from conventional to organic, the organic farm will produce as much and many times more than was possible with conventional methods. There is transition time. And it seems that most of these production numbers include those transitional farms in with all those out of the transition period.

  3. marque2

    There is another issue. The organics are leaching off of the non-organic farmers.

    In the US, ideal crops are grown in bulk in areas. So you might get 100 square miles of tomatoes. Say you are an organic farmer right in the middle of those 100 square miles, and the others are conventional. Well the other farmers are spraying pesticides when insect levels get too high, being surrounded by spraying farmers, actually protects your organic farm as well.

    Also your farm is creating a border where insects are not getting the full force of the pesticides, so your organic farm is helping to create resistance for any insects that do get through.

    1. Umm…. I don’t think you know what you’re talking about. One of the purposes of “organic” is that the farms create the biological controls (pest predators, crop rotation, healthy soil, etc.) that help reduce pest stress while avoiding having to spray toxic chemicals on the land. I think that your hypothetical tomato farmer “leaching” off of the other farmers doesn’t really exist. Also, I think you can ask any conventional farmer who’s worth his or her salt and they’ll tell you that you wait till there’s no wind to spray so that you DON’T lose what you paid for to the blowing wind.

  4. Citizen Buddy

    I have to admit to buying organic milk. It tastes better than regular or “natural” milk.

    Also, I buy into the marketing of “natural” eggs, where growth hormones are not used and the hens are fed a vegetarian diet — and roam a “free range”.

    Organic vegetables? Not so much.

    The organic debate should be left to the marketplace. If someone wants to pay dearly for broccoli that have inordinate long stems, then let them smugly do so.

    1. Jon Murphy

      One thing’s for sure, Free market businessman John Mackey has made a lot of money obeying the market.

    2. The organic debate should be left to the marketplace.


      1. figment

        “I have to admit to buying organic milk. It tastes better than regular or “natural” milk.”

        I used to live in the farm adjacent to an organic dairy farm. I enjoyed the frequent odors of dead cows that were tossed into the fence-rows. (cows dead of easily treatable diseases that require antibiotics. Citric acid doesn’t work for mastitis).

        >>”Also, I buy into the marketing of “natural” eggs, where growth hormones are not used and the hens are fed a vegetarian diet — and roam a “free range”.”

        growth hormones aren’t used for poultry anyway. Through selective breeding, the breeds utilized today reach maturity in a very short time (@6months). Poultry are omnivores, they are require protein (from meat) and free -range mean the hawks and foxes eat well.

        It’s onerous regulation that is strangling the small farmer, giving more power to agribusiness. Those are the ones that utilize hormones, feed level antibiotics, cages and feedlots.

        But at least you can “feel” better about your food.

        Oh, and for anyone who buys “free range pork” because the pigs are happier, pigs that graze are more likely to be infected with roundworm, (trichinosis) so cook your meat well done.
        This is what happens when we run business by “feel good measures”.

    3. Cit

      I have to admit to buying organic milk. It tastes better than regular or “natural” milk.

      Not sure what you mean by “natural” milk, but I frequently buy raw milk as a protest against regulation nazis, even though it costs much more, and it does taste much better than pasteurized milk IMHO.

      An obscene amount of Hershey’s chocolate syrup added to a glass of whole raw milk is better than sex. (well, maybe almost)

  5. Cindy n.

    Organic agriculture is the only kind of agriculture that pays for itself in that it is fully absorbed. There is no chemical pesticide run off into waterways or enter the water table There is also no chemical drift to other farms. The nitrogen sources are in the form of high organic matter and don’t off gas. Workers are paid a fair wage. 8 addition organic vegetable crops are not subsidized and federally funded crop insurance is not available. Also organic farms don’t contaminate the genetics of other farmers crops…corn..alfalfa…beets.. and make their crop unsaleable and threaten their certification. Conventional agriculture seems cost effective because part of the coat is packed up by the US taxpayer and some of the coat is forced onto damage to the environment. I am always fascinated to read comments from people that are so far removed from our food system that they argue from the view point of what they were told in a news report. Grow a turnip and then let’s talk. Witness the chemical contamination of a conventional farm and then let’s talk. The idea that organic systems can’t produce enough food is absurd and it is promoted by people that make money selling seed and chemicals….organic farmers buy much fewer inputs…Monsanto can’t get rich on organic farmers…get it?

  6. Earthworker

    Starvation and malnutrition are caused by politics. GMO production is not sustainable because it is responsible for the obesity and diabetes epidemic which is financially crippling our country. Anyone here spending LESS on healthcare as the years go on?

Comments are closed.

Sort By:

Refine Content:


Additional Keywords:

Refine Results

or to save searches.

Refine Content