AEIdeas

The public policy blog of the American Enterprise Institute

Subscribe to the blog

Discussion: (21 comments)

  1. SeattleSam

    I’m waiting for Mr. Krugman to weigh in on the solar energy scam.

    1. Dimitri Mariutto

      +1

  2. James M. Kearns

    If food prices are soaring because of ethanol, why is inflation so low and predicted to be low for some time into the future?
    (To be clear, I personally consider ethanol a politically and environmentally motivated disaster.)

    1. Jon Murphy

      Core inflation is reported exclusive of food and energy

      1. Where do you live that has no inflation? A cave in Outer Mongolia? Everything I buy is costing more each day. Add in food and energy, unlike the wackos running this country, and inflation is almost reaching Carter days.

  3. SeattleSam

    Food constitutes about 13% of the Consumer Expenditure Survey, and it is excluded altogether from the Core Inflation Calculation.

  4. Che is dead

    “With its corn-based diet and proximity to the United States, Central America has long been vulnerable to economic riptides related to the United States’ corn policy. Now that the United States is using 40 percent of its crop to make biofuel, it is not surprising that tortilla prices have doubled in Guatemala, which imports nearly half of its corn.

    In a country where most families must spend about two thirds of their income on food, ‘the average Guatemalan is now hungrier because of biofuel development.’. . .Roughly 50 percent of the nation’s children are chronically malnourished, the fourth-highest rate in the world, according to the United Nations.” — Open Market.org

    “BRUSSELS (AFP) — The EU Commission on Monday rejected claims that producing biofuels is a “crime against humanity” that threatens food supplies, and vowed to stick to its goals as part of a climate change package. “There is no question for now of suspending the target fixed for biofuels,” said Barbara Helfferich, spokeswoman for EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas. … Their comments came amid growing unease over the planting of biofuel crops as food prices rocket and riots against poverty and hunger multiply worldwide. UN Special Rapporteur for the Right to Food Jean Ziegler told German radio Monday that the production of biofuels is “a crime against humanity” because of its impact on global food prices. EU leaders, seeking to show the way on global warming, have pledged to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 20 percent by 2020. …” — AFP

    Hey, if you’ve got to starve a few Third World children to make the environmental left feel good about themselves, well … small price to pay, no?

    1. The shoe was literally on the other foot when leftists were attacking American capitalists for depriving third world countries of decent wages by setting up low-paying sweatshops to make clothing and shoes in such countries and Haiti, Bangladesh, and Vietnam. Why were those dirty guys at Nike were actually paying Vietnamese laborers less than the $45/month minimum wage?

      Unanswered was the corollary question: How much does a job have to pay above zero in order to attract otherwise unemployed workers?

    2. SeattleSam

      When I was growing up I was told by the left that we had to make sacrifices because the “poor people in China and India” didn’t have jobs. Today I’m told by the left that we shouldn’t be sending our jobs to India and China.

  5. Lets face it the ethanol mandate is pure and simple another form of farm subsidy. Since Iowa has the first caucuses of the presidential selection lottery, it means that candidates have to support the farm income support program that is the whiskey ethanol mandate (made from corn). It keeps the price of corn up which is good for Iowa. Until you make Iowa not the first entry in the presidental nomination process it will stay.

    1. SeattleSam

      You know, if we made Wisconsin the first primary state we could be subsidizing cheese. Oh wait. We already do that.

  6. Benjamin Cole

    The scope and scale of pink GOP moonshine—ethanol—is astonishing.

    10 percent of every gasoline tank (automobile) in the USA, is filled with ethanol. Every car you see driving by (okay with the exception of diesels) is filled 10 percent with ethanol.

    800,000 barrels a day of federally mandated ethanol—that’s barrels, not gallons.

    This program easily dwarfs all of Obama’s misguided green-weenie programs put together.

    Ethanol is the most subsidized energy program in the USA.

    Not only is the program subsidized—and then use of ethanol mandated, by diktat, by the federal government—everything in Rural America is subsidized to help grow the corn, from highways, to rail stops, to phone service, to power and water systems. Even airports. Entitlement outlays are especially heavy in rural zip codes, btw.

    The knock-kneed, inbred, pink-o, socialist, subsidized federalized ethanol program is a hit with the GOP–can you explain that?

    1. Che is dead

      Thanks “Benji”. You can crawl back under your rock now.

      1. Benjamin Cole

        She is Dead-

        Okay, and I will leave you with this:

        FCC to spend $115 million on rural broadband subsidies
        Comments
        By Roger Yu, USA TODAY
        Updated 2012-07-25 5:07 PM
        The Federal Communications Commission said Wednesday it’ll spend $115 million to subsidize broadband Internet providers in an effort to encourage extension of their services to rural parts of the U.S. The companies that accepted the subsidies from the first phase of the “Connect America Fund” – $775 per household connected – also will be required to independently invest in the network infrastructure that will bring high-speed Internet to about 7 million customers in the next six years. The infrastructure work must be completed within three years. About 400,000 residents in 37 states will gain access upon completion, the FCC estimates.”This is a big deal for rural America,” says FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, in an interview, adding that the FCC’s goal is to ultimately connect by 2020 all 19 million Americans in rural areas that lack access to broadband Internet. “Your chances of getting a job is lower if you don’t have broadband. Job postings have moved online.” To be eligible for the subsidy, which is funded by “Universal Connectivity” fees charged to phone customers, Internet providers agree to follow oversight procedures, including reports on how the money was spent. The program’s critics question its scope and reach, but the FCC says subsidies are needed to nudge Internet providers to serve rural areas that lack customers. “In rural areas, where there’s low population density, the economics just don’t work,” Genachowski says. The FCC didn’t disclose how much broadband providers will invest, but says in a statement that it could be in “tens of millions of dollars.” “They have skin in the game,” Genachowski says. Frontier Communications, a telecommunications company based in Stamford, Conn., will receive the largest amount from the fund after agreeing to extend broadband service to about 200,000 customers in 16 states. CenturyLink, based in Monroe, La., will expand service in 22 states, the FCC says. The FCC launched the Connect America Fund last year when it made changes to the Universal Service Fund, which was established to deliver telephone connections to rural towns. A program in the Universal Service Fund – the High Cost program – called for funding telephone companies to ensure that consumers in all regions have access telecommunication services that are comparable to those in urban areas. The industry has lobbied for years to broaden it to include broadband Internet. Last year, the FCC agreed to transfer the money from the High Cost program to the Connect America Fund, which will have a budget of $4.5 billion a year. “This is a bit of an experiment. We don’t know how it’ll play out and whether it’ll pay off. But it’s a good thing to try to make some effort to reach the unserved,” says Michael Romano, senior vice president of policy for the National Telecommunications Cooperative Association, which represents small telecommunications companies that weren’t eligible for the Connect America Fund. While the recipient companies accepted $115 million, the FCC initially offered $300 million. That some Internet providers refused the subsidy, Romano says, indicates the $775-per-household limit may be too small. “It’s probably too low for a lot of areas,” he says.While small towns may benefit from the program, customers in rural countryside may be too remote for continual service from Internet providers, he says, calling for the fund to be open to companies of all sizes.
        The Federal Communications Commission said Wednesday it’ll spend $115 million to subsidize broadband Internet providers in an effort to encourage extension of their services to rural parts of the U.S.

        The companies that accepted the subsidies from the first phase of the “Connect America Fund” – $775 per household connected – also will be required to independently invest in the network infrastructure that will bring high-speed Internet to about 7 million customers in the next six years.

        The infrastructure work must be completed within three years. About 400,000 residents in 37 states will gain access upon completion, the FCC estimates.

        “This is a big deal for rural America,” says FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, in an interview, adding that the FCC’s goal is to ultimately connect by 2020 all 19 million Americans in rural areas that lack access to broadband Internet. “Your chances of getting a job is lower if you don’t have broadband. Job postings have moved online.”

        To be eligible for the subsidy, which is funded by “Universal Connectivity” fees charged to phone customers, Internet providers agree to follow oversight procedures, including reports on how the money was spent.

  7. Let’s hope that in 10 years wind energy is similarly despised.

  8. Is there any particular reason that the ethanol subsidy gets more hate directed towards it than any other subsidy? There are a large number of things that take money from all and give to a select few. Why don’t we direct our anger towards these as well?

    1. “Is there any particular reason that the ethanol subsidy gets more hate directed towards it…”

      Because they make me put it in MY gas tank; which lowers my gas mileage and the life-expectancy of my engine.

    2. Steve

      There are a large number of things that take money from all and give to a select few. Why don’t we direct our anger towards these as well?

      We do. This just happens to be a post on ethanol, which is perhaps the most blatant and longest lasting of the current scams involving government interference in markets for the benefit of a few, at the expense of many.

      Check some other threads at this blog for equally vehement expressions of anger against other forms of fascist government abuse.

      1. Please read the last two paragraphs as non-italics.

  9. Scott Nelson

    Here are a couple of things that concern me with this article and the comments.
    #1. You say more corn is made into ethanol than is fed to animals, but you don’t mention, or you you don’t know about, the by-product of ethanol called distillers grain that is actually a better animal feed than corn. Seems pretty misleading.
    #2. What subsidy are you talking about exactly? The blenders tax credit has been eliminated.

  10. Scott

    Your concerns are legitimate. Some of the assertions aren’t explained well or are incomplete.

    #1 – While you are correct that a byproduct of ethanol production is used for animal feed, the question is whether there are any legitimate reasons to mandate ethanol production in the first place.

    #2 – Yes, he blenders credit is gone, but subsidies to corn growers remain, and more importantly the Renewable Fuel Standard remains.

    If ethanol was an economically superior fuel the industry would thrive on its own without any interference from the heavy hand of government.

Comments are closed.

Sort By:

Refine Content:

Scholar

Additional Keywords:

Refine Results

or to save searches.

Open
Refine Content