Discussion: (3 comments)
Comments are closed.
A public policy blog from AEI
View related content: Education
The Obama administration is not known for its friendliness toward for-profit companies in education. During the administration’s first term, many other Democratic lawmakers have joined in supporting “gainful employment” regulations and competitive grant restrictions that inhibit for-profit involvement. In fact, the day after President Obama won his bid for re-election, for-profit colleges’ stocks declined—a clear sign of investors’ concern over what will come from another four years of Obama’s policies.
Should investors be worried? Based on the most recent Education Insider report put out by WhiteBoard advisers, yes. A striking 21% of respondents feel that for-profit college groups should “panic!” about what will happen to them during Obama’s second term. Combine this with general public hesitation to support for-profit K-12 schools (for more on this, see AEI research fellow Andrew Kelly’s paper), and for-profits’ future in education looks limited.
Critics hear arguments about efficiency or productivity, and assume that for-profit companies are out to destroy public education at the expense of student success. Yes, for-profit education companies deserve scrutiny in the public square. As in many industries, the incentive to grow rapidly and to contain costs can, at times, lead dubious actors to market themselves in deceptive ways or to cut corners with the services they provide.
But suspicious actors are not unique to the for-profit industry. Players in all sectors of education make moral compromises that distract from student learning. School boards struggle with cronyism, and some cash-strapped non-profits launder money. The larger question is not whether for-profits are morally “good” companies, but whether free enterprise can play a valuable role in serving the public’s interests in education. Inviting for-profits into education requires considering two key points:
As reactions to Obama’s re-election show, for-profit success relies on public perceptions. A decline in stocks should be as detrimental to their bottom line as poor student outcomes. Right now, for-profits have no incentive to treat the two scenarios as equal, and this will only worsen if the public and policy makers continue to equate for-profit with evil. What if, instead, we created policies that encourage for-profits to link higher student performance with higher stock value? Rigorous evaluation and transparency in accountability can do just that. When communities know how well a school performs, their satisfaction will translate into confident investors and higher stock value.
Excluding an entire industry from providing services to a struggling education system minimizes our chances to discover new approaches to old problems. But, by reframing the debate as one focused on quality and outcomes for all education providers—governmental, non-profit, and for-profit—we may well find a way for all types of providers to improve America’s schools.
For a provocative conversation on this topic, led by a panel of prominent practitioners, join the AEI Education team on Monday, November 26, 10am.
For more papers on this subject, explore the “Private Enterprise in American Education” project.
Comments are closed.
1150 17th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036
© 2015 American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research