Discussion: (4 comments)
Comments are closed.
The public policy blog of the American Enterprise Institute
View related content: Middle East
Be not deceived; God is not mocked: For whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
I’m usually not big for quoting the Bible, let alone using it as a political guide. But these words of wisdom are wise indeed, and it should come as no surprise to those who make it their business to watch the Middle East that all hell is breaking loose. Why? And could it have been prevented?
Let’s review the bidding:
I’m leaving out Yemen, Bahrain, Kuwait, the Iranian nuclear program, Turkey’s growing Islamist trend, and a dozen other straws in the whirlwind. But the Middle East is on fire, and the $64,000 question is could we have done something about it. Something, yes. Prevent, maybe not. But what is that something?
First, let’s understand what’s afoot in the case of Gaza: Partly, a power play between Hamas and its ilk against Fatah, which “rules” the West Bank. The back story is well covered here. Partly, the sense of an opening to renew full scale Israeli-Palestinian hostilities. Why? And cui bono? Simply, all those Arab and Iranian leaders who have lost their footing are being challenged by their unhappy subjects, all those for whom the banner of Palestinian liberation has been an excuse and a distraction lo these many years, all those (Morsi?) who cannot begin to deliver on the hopes and expectations of their populations after riding a populist Islamist wave to power, all those who wish the world to look somewhere, anywhere, except at their own nuclear weapons program.
Who loses? As always, the innocent Palestinians who suffer the retribution of the Israeli military because of the murderous inclinations of their leaders; moderate Palestinians and those who seek peace in the Middle East; Israel; and the United States of America.
Why do we lose? Simple. Barack Obama has fashioned his own doctrine of American retreat on the premise that threats can be addressed through targeted assassinations (drone strikes) and subcontracting. Got a problem in Syria? Let Qatar do it. Got a problem in Gaza? Let Israel and Egypt fix it.
But Arab priorities and American priorities are not synonymous, as we discovered in Benghazi when terrorists killed the ambassador and three others. And Egypt may not wish to pacify Hamas. Israel may not be able to do so peacefully. The Qataris may not favor moderate Islamists in Syria. (Why would they when they don’t anywhere else?). We have “pivoted” from the Middle East to Asia, but in truth, we have merely turned our backs on our allies and our enemies. No trust, no fear, no foreign policy. If the United States had stayed in the game in Egypt, troubled itself about the rise of terrorists in Libya, spent less time badmouthing Bibi Netanyahu, sided with the better among the Syrian opposition early, and so much more, we might have had a chance to steer a better course. But we didn’t. And so full circle, whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
Comments are closed.
1150 17th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036
© 2014 American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research