###
**Discussion:**
(9 comments)

Comments are closed.

| *AEIdeas*

The latest from AEI experts delivered to your inbox at 6 a.m. ET

**More options:**
Share,
Mark as favorite

**View related content:**
Economics

Mark Perry recently wrote a blog post about the average performance of high school girls and boys on the math section of the SAT, accompanied by a colorful tweet with the caption, “SAT results confirm pattern that’s persisted for 45 years — boys are better at math than girls.”

Dr. Perry’s conclusion — “high school boys are better at math than girls” – may not reflect the nuances that drive, at least in part, the summary statistics he cites.

As we illustrate below, something as simple as an average SAT score can obscure important underlying facts. To demonstrate this, imagine a hypothetical world in which girls are better at math than boys.

In this hypothetical world, four boys and four girls take the SAT, and the girls earn scores of 500, 500, 451, and 525, while the boys earn a 410, a 436, a 450, and an 800. Just as in the 2016 real world data, the female average is a 494, lower than the male average of 524. In this scenario, even though boys do better *on average* than girls, of the top five performers on the SAT, four are girls, and of the bottom three performers (there are eight people in this world, remember) all three are boys. It would be easy to argue that girls are “better” than boys at math in this world, even though on average boys score better than girls. (The old story about Bill Gates walking into a bar and causing the average income to jump into the millions comes to mind.)

Clearly averages can be deceptive as we’ve just shown, but this is not the only important caveat to Dr. Perry’s story. Dr. Perry’s tweeted conclusion implicitly assumes that boys and girls who take the SAT are basically the same – “representative,” the statisticians would say – of the general population of all boys and girls.

**Mark J. Perry:** 2016 SAT test results confirm pattern that’s persisted for 50 years — high school boys are better at math than girls

We have eight high schoolers in our hypothetical world. Now, let’s add four additional boys and four additional girls. Imagine that the four additional girls take the SAT and each scores a 494. Now imagine that the four additional boys don’t take the SAT because they do not plan on pursuing a college education. The male average remains a 524, and the female average remains a 494.

Put simply, in this scenario, the only reason boys scored higher than girls is because the boys who are the worst at math didn’t take the SAT—*not* because “boys are better at math than girls.”

However, if in our hypothetical world it was possible to force each boy and girl to take the exam, we would likely see the male average drop, as the decision to not take the exam is almost certainly related to one’s expected outcome. For example, if when forced to take the exam, the four boys received scores of 350, 350, 450, and 450. This would bring the male average down to 462, well below the female average.

Put simply, in this scenario, the only reason boys scored higher than girls is because the boys who are the worst at math didn’t take the SAT — *not* because “boys are better at math than girls.” This is consistent with data Dr. Perry himself cites, that far more girls take the SAT each year than boys.

Our hypothetical world is also consistent with the other data Dr. Perry presents. Dr. Perry writes that, “For the 117,067 students with SAT math scores in the highest 700-800 point range, high school boys represented 61.5% of those students (71,999) and the 45,068 girls in that group were 38.5% of the total.” In short, there are a larger number of very high performing boys than girls. This finding is consistent with our hypothetical, in which a few high performing boys are pulling up the male average.

Dr. Perry also cites girls’ “superior overall high school records” and over-representation in math classes as evidence that “female high school students are better prepared academically”, making the lower female average math score all the more surprising and suggestive of lower female ability. We argue that this finding – lower male high school GPAs but higher male SAT math averages – could also be consistent with our hypothetical, in which a larger proportion of boys underperform academically compared to girls, and those boys simply choose to not take the exam.

We certainly do not mean to suggest that our hypothetical distributions are exactly representative of the true distributions of math ability for boys and girls, or that the distributions of math ability for boys and girls are identical. However, because an alternate conclusion can be drawn from the statistics that Dr. Perry cites, a more thorough analysis is required.

Finally, we should also note that while performance is certainly related to innate ability, ability may not be the only factor that affects performance, and an examination of the evidence of the effects of gender narratives and culture on academic performance may be warranted.

**Learn more:**

Comments are closed.

AEI

1789 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036

© 2017 American Enterprise Institute

- Samuel J. Abrams (7)
- Joseph Antos (452)
- Leon Aron (473)
- John P. Bailey (19)
- Claude Barfield (551)
- Michael Barone (1386)
- Robert J. Barro (2)
- Roger Bate (883)
- Eric J. Belasco (4)
- Andrew G. Biggs (854)
- Edward Blum (88)
- Dan Blumenthal (375)
- Babette Boliek (60)
- John R. Bolton (949)
- Andrew Bowen (25)
- Karlyn Bowman (2441)
- Alex Brill (301)
- Arthur C. Brooks (715)
- James C. Capretta (388)
- Timothy P. Carney (523)
- Walton Chaney (4)
- Lynne V. Cheney (57)
- Sarah Crain (2)
- Jason D. Delisle (53)
- Sadanand Dhume (416)
- Robert Doar (165)
- Thomas Donnelly (708)
- Colin Dueck (6)
- Mackenzie Eaglen (316)
- Nicholas Eberstadt (560)
- Jeffrey Eisenach (146)
- Kate Farrar (2)
- Clay R. Fuller (19)
- R. Richard Geddes (75)
- Joseph W. Glauber (8)
- Jonah Goldberg (983)
- Barry K. Goodwin (17)
- Phil Gramm (33)
- Eric A. Hanushek (4)
- Robert B. Helms (129)
- Frederick M. Hess (1143)
- R. Glenn Hubbard (156)
- Gus Hurwitz (97)
- Benedic N. Ippolito (24)
- Mark Jamison (88)
- Matt Jensen (60)
- Frederick W. Kagan (440)
- Leon R. Kass (91)
- Paul H. Kupiec (115)
- Jon Kyl (35)
- Desmond Lachman (1292)
- Roslyn Layton (193)
- Adam Lerrick (59)
- Phillip Lohaus (70)
- Daniel Lyons (106)
- Kirsten D. Madison (9)
- Nat Malkus (108)
- Oriana Skylar Mastro (17)
- Aparna Mathur (371)
- Michael Mazza (266)
- Bruce D. Meyer (6)
- Thomas P. Miller (456)
- John W. Miller (3)
- Charles Murray (354)
- Roger F. Noriega (561)
- Stephen D. Oliner (121)
- Ed Olsen (5)
- Norman J. Ornstein (1014)
- Anthony Paranzino (1)
- Mark J. Perry (13668)
- James Pethokoukis (4701)
- Edward J. Pinto (338)
- Danielle Pletka (1088)
- AEI Events Podcast (7)
- Kenneth Pollack (19)
- Ramesh Ponnuru (549)
- Angela Rachidi (147)
- Vincent R. Reinhart (137)
- Gerard Robinson (159)
- Dalibor Rohac (193)
- Michael Rubin (1702)
- Sally Satel (466)
- Naomi Schaefer Riley (2)
- Gary J. Schmitt (671)
- Mark Schneider (74)
- Derek Scissors (264)
- Neena Shenai (1)
- Sita Nataraj Slavov (62)
- Andy Smarick (157)
- Vincent H. Smith (137)
- Christina Hoff Sommers (253)
- Katharine B. Stevens (79)
- Michael R. Strain (314)
- Ryan Streeter (55)
- Phillip Swagel (96)
- Bret Swanson (116)
- Jim Talent (63)
- Shane Tews (85)
- Marc A. Thiessen (1523)
- Jessica Trisko Darden (8)
- Stan Veuger (333)
- Alan D. Viard (369)
- Peter J. Wallison (993)
- W. Bradford Wilcox (121)
- Paul Wolfowitz (188)
- John Yoo (361)
- Paul Zajac (5)
- Roger I. Zakheim (35)
- Weifeng Zhong (32)
- Katherine Zimmerman (192)
- Benjamin Zycher (197)

I do not think you have reached the correct conclusion.

If Honors Math in high school predicts the highest scores on the SAT for math, and females out number males by 10% in HS Honors Math,…

then how can males achieve 46% of the highest scores on the SAT than females — even if 10% less males than females take the math portion of the SAT?

Share

correction of last line:

then how can males achieve 46%

higherscores on the SAT math portion than females — even if 10% less males than females take the math portion of the SAT?Share

Thank you for clarifying. Since women outnumber men in college, have higher High School GPA’s, and probably better on the SAT…when will we stop the pretense that boys are favored in school and start helping the under-represented, under-prepared males?

Share

Hypotheticals are fun, but prove nothing. What is the actual distribution of scores for boys versus girls (can I say that?) or males versus females (still not sure I can say that)?

A graphic showing the deciles by gender (still not sure that resolves the potential backlash) might be revealing.

Share

let’s make Mark take the test and see if the male average goes down by as much as you suggest..

Share

Let’s accept that the poorly performing boys are not taking the test. We should assume that both the best boys and the best girls are taking the test. Under your hypothesis, we should therefore expect an equal proportion of boys and girls in the 700-800 range. So, while we can’t say boys are better then girls *on average*, it is clearly the case that the best performers in mathematics are boys. It is therefore disingenuous to lead people to believe that boys and girls performance is comparable.

Share

Wendy Morrison and Grace Finley proving that girls and women just aren’t that good at math.

Share

The difference between male and female means is simply too large to be a result of dumber males not taking the test. I show this mathematically here:

https://jasonbayz.wordpress.com/2016/10/08/are-high-school-girls-better-at-math-than-high-school-boys/

Share

A bit of irony that Wendy and Grace could not effectively math their arguments….

Share