AEIdeas

The public policy blog of the American Enterprise Institute

Subscribe to the blog

Discussion: (12 comments)

  1. mesa econoguy

    Here’s an appraisal:

    FAIL

  2. You should at least get your background facts correct. Romer’s predictions were based on her proposed substantially larger stimulus than what Obama & Summers ultimately agreed to.

    1. mesa econoguy

      Naturally.

      Since neither Ms Roemer’s dress size nor Paul Krughole’s ego were large enough to salvage this catastrophe, I’m certain you get a hall pass.

    2. SaveFarris

      Incorrect. According to Section A (page 3) of the original report …

      “We have assumed a
      package just slightly over the $775 billion currently under discussion.”

  3. Todd Mason

    Or we could call ARRA the failure of the largest tax cut in history, $300 billion over two years vs .$174 billion and $234 billion in Dubyas ! and !!. In fact, look at the top 10 expenditures in the stimulus package. http://projects.nytimes.com/44th_president/stimulus

    Exactly one is infrastructure — $27B for roads and bridges. The other 9 are tax cuts or direct aid to states and individuals. Direct aid was another big piece of ARRA: extended UI and food stamps; cash payments to seniors; support for states in education and Medicaid and on and on. Putting money in the pockets of people who can spend it wisely? Been there; tried that. Didn’t work in 2009.

    The government spending part was a disaster, but it was far from a $787 billion disaster. We know that government shouldn’t do things quickly. Not the same as government shouldn’t do anything at all.,

    1. Or we could call ARRA the failure of the largest tax cut in history,

      You could, but you’d be incorrect. Tax gimmicks that redistribute income are different from tax cuts that stimulate. Much of those so-called “tax cuts” went to people who don’t pay any income taxes in the first place.

      In short, it was the first of many Obama policies designed to take money from groups outside his coalition and hand it out to the mouths to feed within his coalition.

      1. Todd Mason

        And naturally you are wrong. The biggest single piece, the $116B Making Work Pay tax credit wasn’t overly helpful to people who didn’t owe taxes, being a tax credit. Ditto for the $70 billion extension of the AMT, credits for buying cars and houses and paying college tuition. Toss in $30 billion in breaks for corporation and we are up to about $250B of the $300B in taxes. By contrast, the bill added $4.7B to EITC and waived $4.7B in taxes on UI benefits.
        The Making Work Pay credit by itself was bigger than direct federal spending. So, I guess we can say that only thing shovel ready about the tax cuts was the race to bury the money in the backyard.

  4. I love leftist porn star economics.

    The right creams even better. The CBO estimates that the little dick (“The Shrub”) Tax Cuts cost 4 times more than the big prick (“The Black Guy”) ARRA.

    1. mesa econoguy

      LOL

      The CBO also said we would have a surplus of $2.436T in 2011

      http://www.cbo.gov/publication/12958

      What did the Oracle of Delphi say, smarmy?

    2. Marmico,

      The CBO estimates that the little dick (“The Shrub”) Tax Cuts cost 4 times more than the big prick (“The Black Guy”) ARRA.

      I do think Bush was wrong to take millions of people completely off the income tax rolls, leaving them with no skin in the game. And those tax cuts were surely revenue losers, no doubt about it.

  5. Where is the reset button?

  6. FORWARD to the Detroitification of America!

Comments are closed.

Sort By:

Refine Content:

Scholar

Additional Keywords:

Refine Results

or to save searches.

Open
Refine Content