Discussion: (2 comments)
Comments are closed.
The public policy blog of the American Enterprise Institute
View related content: Aging
In Sunday’s New York Times, columnist Nick Kristof has an important piece that I recommend, discussing how America’s social safety net has become in too many instances a net that entraps people rather than catches them when they fall:
“This is painful for a liberal to admit, but conservatives have a point when they suggest that America’s safety net can sometimes entangle people in a soul-crushing dependency. Our poverty programs do rescue many people, but other times they backfire.
Some young people here don’t join the military (a traditional escape route for poor, rural Americans) because it’s easier to rely on food stamps and disability payments.
Antipoverty programs also discourage marriage: In a means-tested program like Supplemental Security Income (SSI), a woman raising a child may receive a bigger check if she refrains from marrying that hard-working guy she likes. Yet marriage is one of the best forces to blunt poverty. In married couple households, only one child in 10 grows up in poverty, while almost half do in single-mother households.
Most wrenching of all are the parents who think it’s best if a child stays illiterate, because then the family may be able to claim a disability check each month.
‘One of the ways you get on this program is having problems in school,” notes Richard V. Burkhauser, a Cornell University economist who co-wrote a book last year about these disability programs. “If you do better in school, you threaten the income of the parents. It’s a terrible incentive.’ “
Burkhauser is an adjunct scholar at AEI, and his 2011 AEI Press book “The Declining Work and Welfare of People with Disabilities” with Mary C. Daly is a must-read for anyone interested in the convoluted world of disability policy.
I grew up in a lower middle class family, and some of our neighbors were poor–including some who were on food stamps and other forms of government assistance. We were lucky to avoid that (“lucky” in that my dad supplemented his relatively small salary by driving a bus in the summer and various other jobs). It’s not that my dad was a political conservative–he wasn’t–but he saw how welfare payments changed the dynamics of the families around us. Instead of helping them, it ended up hurting them.
In 1996, thanks to the increasing bipartisan understanding that welfare can hurt families (in no small part due to Charles Murray’s seminal work “Losing Ground“), America reformed welfare in a way that recognized that what people need to be happy is not material handouts, but the opportunity to earn their own success.
As my colleague Nick Eberstadt shows, the growth of the entitlement state has had a deleterious impact on our national character–and fixing disability policy is an important first step in solving the larger problem.
Bravo to Nick Kristof for drawing attention to the problems that our well-intentioned social welfare and entitlement policies have caused. This shouldn’t be a partisan or ideological struggle.
Comments are closed.
1150 17th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036
© 2014 American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research